Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-wlffp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-03T18:36:24.450Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Human-Centric AI Governance: An Adaptive Public International Law Framework for Ethical and Inclusive AI Regulation in Public Health

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2025

Farman Saeed Sedeeq*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Law, https://ror.org/02x8svs93 Near East University , Cyprus
Percem Arman
Affiliation:
Faculty of Law, https://ror.org/02x8svs93 Near East University , Cyprus
*
Corresponding author: Farman Saeed Sedeeq; Email: farmansedeeq@gmail.com

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming public health, presenting both opportunities and ethical and legal challenges. This study adopts an interdisciplinary approach, integrating legal doctrinal analysis, public health ethics, AI governance scholarship and a scoping review of international legal instruments to evaluate and operationalize three core pillars: ethical accountability, regulatory adaptability and transparency. Through a scoping review of treaties, regional regulations and policy frameworks, the study maps jurisdictional gaps and proposes an adaptive public law framework that addresses critical shortcomings in existing AI governance models, such as the WHO’s limited enforceability and the GDPR’s rigid data-sharing rules. The framework introduces scalable, region-specific regulations to enhance interoperability while respecting local governance needs. Its human-centric design, modular regulation and accountability mechanisms ensure adaptability across diverse legal, cultural and health system contexts. Informed by case studies and a thematic synthesis of global best practices, this framework offers policymakers and practitioners a structured yet flexible approach to balancing AI-driven innovation with ethical imperatives, promoting equitable public health outcomes.

Information

Type
Independent Articles
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Al-Hwsali, Anwar et al., “Scoping review: Legal and ethical principles of artificial intelligence in public health,” Healthcare Transformation with Informatics and Artificial Intelligence (2023): 640643, https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI230579.Google ScholarPubMed
Murphy, Kathleen et al., “Artificial intelligence for good health: a scoping review of the ethics literature,” BMC medical ethics 22 (2021): 117, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-02100577-8.Google Scholar
Cudjoe, Amedior N., “Ethical implications of artificial intelligence in the healthcare sector,” In Proceedings of the 36th iSTEAMS Accra Bespoke Advanced Multidiscipline Innovation Conference (2023): 112, https://www.isteams.net/ghanabespoke2023/; https://doi.org/10.22624/AIMS/ACCRABESPOKE2023P1Google Scholar
Jobin, Anna, Ienca, Marcello, and Vayena, Effy, “The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines,” Nature Machine intelligence 1, no. 9 (2019): 389399, https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2.Google Scholar
O’Shaughnessy, R. Matthew et al., “What governs attitudes toward artificial intelligence adoption and governance?,” Science and Public Policy 50, no. 2 (2023): 161176, https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scac056.Google Scholar
Farhat, Rehman et al., “The Role of AI in Enhancing Healthcare Access and Service Quality in Resource-Limited Settings,” International Journal of Artificial Intelligence 11, no. 2 (2024): 7079, https://doi.org/10.36079/lamintang.ijai-01102.709.Google Scholar
World Health Organization, Ethics and governance of artificial intelligence for health: large multi-modal models: WHO guidance (World Health Organization, 2024), ISBN 978-92-4-008475-9, https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/375579/9789240084759-eng.pdf (last visited July 4, 2024).Google Scholar
Farhat et al., “The Role of AI in Enhancing Healthcare Access and Service Quality,” at 77.Google Scholar
World Health Organization, Ethics and governance of artificial intelligence for health, at 50.Google Scholar
World Health Organization, Ethics and governance of artificial intelligence for health, at 50.Google Scholar
Jae Moon, M., “Searching for inclusive artificial intelligence for social good: Participatory governance and policy recommendations for making AI more inclusive and benign for society,” Public Administration Review 83, no. 6 (2023): 14961505, https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13648.Google Scholar
Moon, “Searching for inclusive artificial intelligence for social good,” at 1504.Google Scholar
World Health Organization, Ethics and governance of artificial intelligence for health, at IX.Google Scholar
Camilleri, Mark Anthony, “Artificial intelligence governance: Ethical considerations and implications for social responsibility,” Expert Ssystems 41, no. 7 (2024): 115, https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.13406.Google Scholar
Indriati, Noer, Yuliantiningsih, Aryani and Wismaningsih, Wismaningsih, “The International Health Regulation 2005 and Indonesia’s Actions in Handling the Covid-19 Outbreak as te State’s Responbility,” Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 16, no. 4 (2022): 331346, https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v16no4.2566.Google Scholar
Katz, Rebecca et al., “Global health security agenda and the international health regulations: moving forward,” Biosecurity and Bioterrorism: Biodefense Strategy, Practice, and Science 12, no. 5 (2014): 231238, https://doi.org/10.1089/bsp.2014.0038.Google ScholarPubMed
Gostin, Lawrence O. et al., “The shibboleth of human rights in public health,” Lancet Public Health 5, no. 9 (2020): e471e472, https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30182-1.Google ScholarPubMed
Gostin et al., “The shibboleth of human rights in public health,” at e471.Google Scholar
Zhang, Hu, “Challenges and approaches of the global governance of public health under COVID-19,” Frontiers in Public Health 9 (2021): 110, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.727214.Google ScholarPubMed
Zhang, “Challenges and approaches,” at 2.Google Scholar
Abràmoff, Michael D. et al., “Pivotal trial of an autonomous AI-based diagnostic system for detection of diabetic retinopathy in primary care offices,” NPJ Digital Medicine 1, no. 1 (2018): 2738, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-018-0040-6.Google ScholarPubMed
Vayena, Effy, “Value from health data: European opportunity to catalyse progress in digital health,” Lancet 397, no. 10275 (2021): 652653, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00203-00203-8.Google ScholarPubMed
Andreychenko, Anna et al., “Digital public health technologies: rationale for a multidisciplinary research laboratory,” OSF Preprints, (2022): 124, https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/2kxbm.Google Scholar
Morgenstern, Jason D. et al., “’AI’s gonna have an impact on everything in society, so it has to have an impact on public health’: a fundamental qualitative descriptive study of the implications of artificial intelligence for public health,” BMC Public Health 21 (2021): 114, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-10030-x.Google Scholar
Grunhut, Joel, Marques, Oge, and Adam, T.M. Wyatt, “Needs, challenges, and applications of artificial intelligence in medical education curriculum,” JMIR Medical Education 8, no. 2 (2022): e35587, https://doi.org/10.2196/35587.Google Scholar
Brand, Dirk, “Responsible artificial intelligence in government: Development of a legal framework for South Africa,” JeDEM-eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government 14, no. 1 (2022): 130150, https://doi.org/10.29379/jedem.v14i1.678.Google Scholar
Tang, Yunqing and Cai, Jinliang, “Impact and Prediction of AI Diagnostic Report Interpretation Type on Patient Trust,” Frontiers in Computing and Intelligent Systems 3, no. 3 (2023): 5965, https://doi.org/10.54097/fcis.v3i3.8567.Google Scholar
Jobin, Marcello and Vayena, “The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines,” at 390.Google Scholar
World Health Organization, Ethics and governance of artificial intelligence for health, at 21.Google Scholar
Morgenstern et al., “AI’s gonna have an impact on everything in society,” at 11.Google Scholar
Moon, “Searching for inclusive artificial intelligence for social good,” at 1504.Google Scholar
Al-Hwsali et al., “Scoping review,” at 642.Google Scholar
Tang and Cai, “Impact and Prediction of AI Diagnostic Report Interpretation Type on Patient Trust”: 59-65.Google Scholar
O’Shaughnessy et al., “What governs attitudes toward artificial intelligence,” at 169.Google Scholar
Tshimula, Jean Marie et al., “Artificial Intelligence for Public Health Surveillance in Africa: Applications and Opportunities,” arXiv (2024): arXiv:2408.02575, 1-41, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2408.02575.Google Scholar
Mumo, Joyce Kanini, “Utilization of Mobile Maternal Health Services among Women of Reproductive Age in Makueni County, Kenya,” (Ph.D. dissertation, Kenyatta University, 2024), at 9.Google Scholar
de Souza Filho, José Cezar et al., Database Search for a Tertiary Sstudy on Appropriate Reliance in XAI Systems (HAL open science, 2024), https://hal.science/hal-04637901.Google Scholar
Xudaybergenov, Azamat, “Toward Legal Recognition of Artificial Intelligence Proposals for Limited Subject of Law Status,” International Journal of Law and Policy 1, no. 4 (2023): 18, https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.55.Google Scholar
Greene, Daniel, Hoffmann, Anna Lauren, and Stark, Luke, “Better, Nicer, Clearer, Fairer: A Critical Assessment of the Movement for Ethical Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning,” Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2019): 21222130, https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2019.258.Google Scholar
Grunhut, Marques, and Wyatt, “Needs, challenges, and applications of artificial intelligence in medical education curriculum,” 1-5.Google Scholar
Jobin, Marcello and Vayena, “The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines,” at 396.Google Scholar
Zhang, Jie and Zhang, Zong-ming, “Ethics and governance of trustworthy medical artificial intelligence,” BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 23, no. 1 (2023): 215, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-023-02103-9.Google ScholarPubMed
Su, Anna, “The promise and perils of international human rights law for AI governance,” Law, Technology and Humans 4, no. 2 (2022): 166182, https://doi.org/10.5204/lthj.2332.Google Scholar
Morgenstern et al., “AI’s gonna have an impact on everything in society,” at 11.Google Scholar
Akinloluwa, Olaoluwa Oluwafemi et al., “Towards a multi-lateral framework for cross-border surveillance and information sharing between Nigeria and neighbouring countries,” BMJ Global Health 9, no. 3 (2024): 15, https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013011.Google ScholarPubMed
Tshimula et al., “Artificial Intelligence for Public Health Surveillance,” at 2.Google Scholar
Morgenstern et al., “AI’s gonna have an impact on everything in society,” at 11.Google Scholar
Jobin, Marcello, and Vayena, “The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines,” at 395.Google Scholar
Yun, Heylyung, “China’s data sovereignty and security: Implications for global digital borders and governance,” Chinese Political Science Review (2024): 126, https://doi.org/10.1007/s41111-024-00269-9.Google Scholar
Cihon, Peter, Maas, Matthijs M. and Kemp, Luke, “Fragmentation and the future: investigating architectures for international AI governance,” Global Policy 11, no. 5 (2020): 545556, https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12890.Google Scholar
Al-Hwsali et al., “Scoping review,” at 642.Google Scholar
Brand, “Responsible artificial intelligence in government: Development of a legal framework for South Africa,” 130-150.Google Scholar
Al-Hwsali et al., “Scoping review,” at 641.Google Scholar
Cihon, Maas, and Kemp, “Fragmentation and the future,” at 547.Google Scholar
Indriati, Yuliantiningsih, and Wismaningsih, “The International Health Regulation,” at 331–346.Google Scholar
World Health Organization, Ethics and governance of artificial intelligence for health, at v.Google Scholar
Greene, Hoffmannn and Stark, “Better, Nicer, Clearer, Fairer” at 2124.Google Scholar
Tripathi, Abhishek and Rathore, Rachna, “AI in Disease Surveillance—An Overview of How AI Can Be Used in Disease Surveillance and Outbreak Detection in Real‐World Scenarios,” in AI in Disease Detection: Advancements and Applications, ed. Singh, Rajesh et al. (2025): 337359.Google Scholar
Yun, “China’s data sovereignty and security: Implications for global digital borders and governance,” 1–26Google Scholar
Kanini Mumo, “Utilization of Mobile Maternal Health,” at 27.Google Scholar
Tripathi and Rathore, “AI in Disease Surveillance,” at 339.Google Scholar
Morgenstern et al., “AI’s gonna have an impact on everything in society,” at 11.Google Scholar
Surjit, Paul, “Accessibility analysis using WCAG 2.1: evidence from Indian e-government websites,” Universal Access in the Information Society 22, no. 2 (2023): 663669, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-021-00861-9.Google Scholar
Akinloluwa et al., “Towards a multi-lateral framework for cross-border surveillance and information sharing between Nigeria and neighbouring countries,” at 2.Google Scholar
Zeb, Shah et al., “Transforming Healthcare: Artificial Intelligence’s Place in Contemporary Medicine,” BULLET: Jurnal Multidisiplin Ilmu 3, no. 4 (2024): 488, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/383212544_Transforming_Healthcare_Artificial_Intelligence's_Place_in_Contemporary_Medicine. (last visited July 4, 2024).Google Scholar
Quinn, Paul, Ellyne, Erika and Yao, Cong, “Will the GDPR Restrain Health Data Access Bodies Under the European Health Data Space (EHDS)?,” Computer Law & Security Review 54 (2024): 115, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2024.1059993.Google Scholar
Mendes, Vinícius and Viola, Eduardo, “Green Digitalization? Agriculture 4.0 and the Challenges of Environmental Governance in Brazil,” in Sustainability Challenges of Brazilian Agriculture: Governance, Inclusion and Innovation, ed. Søndergaard, Niels, de Sá, Camila Dias, and Barros-Platiau, Ana Flâvia (Springer International Publishing, 2023): at pp. 207226, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29853-0_11.Google Scholar
Mendes and Viola, “Green Digitalization?,” at pp. 207–226.Google Scholar
Grunhut, Oge, and Wyatt, “Needs, challenges and applications of artificial intelligence,” at 2.Google Scholar
Belenguer, Lorenzo, “AI bias: exploring discriminatory algorithmic decision-making models and the application of possible machine-centric solutions adapted from the pharmaceutical industry,” AI and Ethics 2, no. 4 (2022): 771787, https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-022-00138-8.Google ScholarPubMed
Cudjoe, “Ethical implications of artificial intelligence in the healthcare sector,” at 4.Google Scholar
Jobin, Marcello, and Vayena, “The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines,” at 395.Google Scholar
Filho et al., Database search, at 280.Google Scholar
Greene, Hoffmann, and Stark, “Better, Nicer, Clearer, Fairer,” at 2127.Google Scholar
Morgenstern et al., “AI’s gonna have an impact on everything in society,” at 11.Google Scholar
Morgenstern et al., “AI’s gonna have an impact on everything in society,” at 11.Google Scholar
Belenguer, “AI bias,” at 773.Google Scholar
Kanini, “Utilization of Mobile Maternal Health,” at 9.Google Scholar
Jain, Angela and Dienel, Hans-Liudger, “Deliberative democracy in times of crisis: the capability of citizens ‘assemblies to overcome societal polarization,” Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 37, no. 3 (2024): 681686, https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2024.2381958.Google Scholar
Kanini, “Utilization of Mobile Maternal Health,” at 29.Google Scholar
Yun, “China’s data sovereignty and security: Implications for global digital borders and governance,” 1–26.Google Scholar
Quinn, Ellyne, and Yao, “Will the GDPR Restrain Health Data Access?,” at 4.Google Scholar
Tripathi and Rathore, “AI in Disease Surveillance,” at 339.Google Scholar
Moon, “Searching for inclusive artificial intelligence for social good,” at 1504.Google Scholar
World Health Organization, Ethics and governance of artificial intelligence for health, at 21.Google Scholar
Zeb et al., “Transforming Healthcare: Artificial Intelligence’s Place in Contemporary Medicine,” 483-490.Google Scholar
Abràmoff et al., “Pivotal trial of an autonomous AI-based diagnostic system for detection of diabetic retinopathy in primary care offices,” 1-8.Google Scholar
Jobin, Marcello, and Vayena, “The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines,” at 397.Google Scholar
Camilleri, “Artificial intelligence governance,” at 2.Google Scholar
World Health Organization, Ethics and governance of artificial intelligence for health, at 32.Google Scholar
Tshimula et al., “Artificial Intelligence for Public Health Surveillance,” at 14.Google Scholar
Alshehri, Sarah, Alahmari, Khalid A., and Alasiry, Areej, “A comprehensive evaluation of AI-assisted diagnostic tools in ENT medicine: insights and perspectives from healthcare professionals,” Journal of Personalized Medicine 14, no. 4 (2024): 354, https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm14040354.Google ScholarPubMed
Halabhavi, Basavaraj M., “AI-driven predictive analytics in healthcare: improving patient outcomes and resource allocation,” African Journal of Biomedical Research 27, no. 4 (2024): 92889297, https://doi.org/10.53555/ajbr.v27i4s.5427.Google Scholar
Bhatt, Alia, “Development of AI-driven healthcare systems in rural India,” Asian Journal of Computing and Engineering Technology 5, no. 3 (2024): 2130, https://doi.org/10.47604/ajcet.2808.Google Scholar
Igwama, Geneva T. et al., “AI and big data analytics for enhancing public health surveillance in rural communities,” International Journal of Applied Research in Social Sciences 6, no. 8 (2024): 17971823, https://doi.org/10.51594/ijarss.v6i8.1427.Google Scholar
Ek, Sara and Öman, Ellen, “Embracing Change In North Sweden: A qualitative study of attitudes towards Artificial Intelligence,” (Master’s thesis, Umeå School of Business, Economics, and Statistics, 2024), at 44.Google Scholar
Roche, Stephanie D. et al., “Measuring the performance of computer vision artificial intelligence to interpret images of HIV self-testing results,” Frontiers in Public Health 12, (2024): 113, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1334881.Google ScholarPubMed
Ek and Öman, “Embracing Change,” at 44.Google Scholar
Zeb et al., “Transforming Healthcare,” at 487.Google Scholar
Cocq, Céline C., “Sharing Data with Peers from the Same Region: A Matter of Mutual Trust,” in Mutual Trust in Regional and Interregional Cooperation on Counterterrorism: EU and ASEAN Approaches (Springer Nature, 2024) at 245318, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36612-3_6.Google Scholar
Elfenbein, Timothy W. and Hoffman, Andrew S., “Towards meaningful institutional change: Responsive bureaucracy and the governance of anthropological ethics,” Anthropology Today 40, no. 2 (2024): 47, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8233.12871.Google Scholar
Quinn, Ellyne, and Yao, “Will the GDPR Restrain Health Data Access)?,” at 6.Google Scholar
Ebers, Martin, “Truly risk-based regulation of artificial intelligence how to implement the EU’s AI Act,” European Journal of Risk Regulation (2024): 120, https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2024.78.Google Scholar
Filho et al., Database search, at 104.Google Scholar
Al-Hwsali et al., “Scoping review,” at 642.Google Scholar
Jain and Dienel, “Deliberative democracy in times of crisis,” at 682.Google Scholar
World Health Organization, Ethics and governance of artificial intelligence for health, at 45.Google Scholar
Jain and Dienel, “Deliberative democracy in times of crisis,” at 682.Google Scholar
Alshehri, Alahmari, and Alasiry, “A comprehensive evaluation of AI-assisted diagnostic tools in ENT medicine,” at 354.Google Scholar
Elfenbein and Hoffman, “Towards meaningful institutional change,” at 4.Google Scholar
Farhat et al., “The Role of AI in Enhancing Healthcare Access and Service Quality,” at 77.Google Scholar
Akinloluwa et al., “Towards a multi-lateral framework for cross-border surveillance and information sharing between Nigeria and neighbouring countries,” at 1.Google Scholar
Elfenbein and Hoffman, “Towards meaningful institutional change,” at 5.Google Scholar
Elfenbein and Hoffman, “Towards meaningful institutional change,” at 5.Google Scholar