Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-rkzlw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-03T02:34:31.932Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An Analysis of Anti-Bullying Laws in the United States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 August 2025

Dane Alexander White*
Affiliation:
Division of Injury Prevention, https://ror.org/0015x1k58 National Center for Injury Prevention and Control , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Chamblee, GA, USA
Gabrielle F. Miller
Affiliation:
Division of Injury Prevention, https://ror.org/0015x1k58 National Center for Injury Prevention and Control , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Chamblee, GA, USA
Kyle Rosenblum
Affiliation:
Division of Injury Prevention, https://ror.org/0015x1k58 National Center for Injury Prevention and Control , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Chamblee, GA, USA
Christopher Dunphy
Affiliation:
Division of Injury Prevention, https://ror.org/0015x1k58 National Center for Injury Prevention and Control , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Chamblee, GA, USA
Riley Wagner
Affiliation:
Division of Violence Prevention, https://ror.org/0015x1k58 National Center for Injury Prevention and Control , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Chamblee, GA, USA
Molly Merrill-Francis
Affiliation:
Division of Violence Prevention, https://ror.org/0015x1k58 National Center for Injury Prevention and Control , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Chamblee, GA, USA
*
Corresponding author: Dane Alexander White; Email: rej0@cdc.gov

Abstract

Bullying is a public health concern that results in diminished well-being for children and adolescents. One approach that lawmakers have taken to address bullying is enacting anti-bullying laws, which require school districts to establish bullying prevention policies. In this study, researchers used standard legal epidemiology methods to systematically retrieve and analyze anti-bullying laws in the United States (US). While they found that every US state and the District of Columbia has a school anti-bullying law, there is wide variation in their scope and requirements. Some jurisdictions specified requirements that school districts must implement in their anti-bullying policies, while others deferred policy enactment entirely to school districts. Given the differences in requirements and scoping afforded in anti-bullying laws, understanding the important components included in such policies can help provide policymakers and practitioners with information about bullying prevention strategies across jurisdictions.

Information

Type
Independent Articles
Creative Commons
This is a work of the US Government and is not subject to copyright protection within the United States. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics
Copyright
© Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

“1991-2021 High School Youth Risk Behavior Survey Data,” Centers for Disease Control and Prevention., https://yrbs-explorer.services.cdc.gov/#/ (last visited January 22, 2025).Google Scholar
“Teens and Cyberbullying 2022,” Pew Research Center, https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2022/12/15/teens-and-cyberbullying-2022/ (last visited May 7, 2024).Google Scholar
Gladden, R.M., et al., “Bullying surveillance among youths: Uniform definitions for public health and recommended data elements, Version 1.0,” CDC (2014): 7.Google Scholar
Kennedy, R.S., “Bully-Victims: An Analysis of Subtypes and Risk Characteristics,” Journal of Interpersonal Violence 36, no. 11–12 (2021): 54015421; G. Gini and T. Pozzoli, “Association between bullying and psychosomatic problems: a meta-analysis,” Pediatrics 123, no. 3 (2009): 1059–1065; M.K. Holt, et al., “Bullying and suicidal ideation and behaviors: a meta-analysis,” Pediatrics 135, no. 2 (2015): e496–509; P. Baiden and S.K. Tadeo, “Investigating the association between bullying victimization and suicidal ideation among adolescents: Evidence from the 2017 Youth Risk Behavior Survey,” Child Abuse Neglect 102 (2020): 104417; W.E. Copeland, et al., “Adult psychiatric outcomes of bullying and being bullied by peers in childhood and adolescence,” JAMA Psychiatry 70, no. 4 (2013): 419–426; A. Brunstein Klomek, et al., “Bi‐directional longitudinal associations between different types of bullying victimization, suicide ideation/attempts, and depression among a large sample of European adolescents,” Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 60, no. 2 (2019): 209-–215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haegele, J.A., Aigner, C., and Healy, S., “Impact of weight and disability status on bullying victimisation and perpetration among youth,” Journal of Paediatric Child Health 57, no. 3 (2021): 383387; B.R. Maynard, et al., “Bullying Victimization Among School-Aged Immigrant Youth in the United States,” Journal of Adolescent Health 58, no. 3 (2016): 337–344; K.T. De Pedro, et al., “Examining the Relationship Between School Climate and Peer Victimization Among Students in Military-Connected Public Schools,” Violence and Victims 31, no. 4 (2016):751–767.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
“Laws, Policies & Regulations,” StopBullying.gov, https://www.stopbullying.gov/resources/laws, last visited May 7, 2024 (hereinafter “StopBullying.gov”).Google Scholar
Stuart-Cassel, V., Bell, A., and Springer, J.F., Analysis of State Bullying Laws and Policies (United States Department of Education,.2011).Google Scholar
Rees, D.I., Sabia, J.J., and Kumpas, G., “Anti-Bullying Laws and Suicidal Behaviors Among Teenagers,” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 41, no. 3 (2022): 787823; J.J. Sabia and B. Bass. “Do anti-bullying laws work? New evidence on school safety and youth violence,” Journal of Population Economics 30, no.2 (2017): 473–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liang, Y., et al., “Association Between State Antibullying Policies and Suicidal Behaviors Among Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Questioning Youth,” JAMA Pediatrics 177, no. 5 (2023): 534536.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramirez, M.R., et al., “Building a comprehensive, longitudinal dataset to advance research on the efficacy of state-level anti-bullying legislation: 1999 to 2017,” Trauma, Violence, & Abuse 25, no. 4 (2023): 25693434.Google ScholarPubMed
StopBullying.gov, supra note 8.Google Scholar
Wagenaar, A.C., Pacula, R.L. and Burris, S., eds, Legal Epidemiology: Theory and Methods, 2nd ed. (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2023).Google Scholar
Thomson Reuters Westlaw, https://next.westlaw.com (last visited May 7, 2024).Google Scholar
Public Health Law Information Portal, https://phlip.cdc.gov (last visited May 7, 2024).Google Scholar
Va. Code Ann. § 22.1-276.01.Google Scholar
105 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 5/27-23.7.Google Scholar
Tex. Educ. Code Ann. § 37.0832.Google Scholar
200-30 R.I. Code R. § 10-2.2.Google Scholar
N.J. Admin. Code § 6A:16-1.3.Google Scholar
Ala. Code § 16-28B-5.Google Scholar
Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-6-4505Google Scholar
Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 15-341.Google Scholar
603 Mass. Code Regs. § 49.04Google Scholar
Ramirez, supra note 14.Google Scholar
Doty, J.L., et al., “The Dosage, Context, and Modality of Interventions to Prevent Cyberbullying Perpetration and Victimization: a Systematic Review,” Prevention Science 23, no. 4 (2022): 523537.10.1007/s11121-021-01314-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peebles, E., “Cyberbullying: Hiding behind the screen,” Paediatrics & Child Health 19, no. 10 (2014): 527528.10.1093/pch/19.10.527CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Id.; Doty, supra note 26.Google Scholar
Blaya, C., Audrin, C., and Skrzypiec, G., “School bullying, perpetration, and cyberhate: Overlapping issues,” Contemporary School Psychology (2020): 341349.Google Scholar
Cross, T.P., et al., “Child welfare policy and practice on children’s exposure to domestic violence,” Child Abuse and Neglect 36, no. 3 (2012): 210216; J.M. Ross. “Unfunded Mandates and Fiscal Structure: Empirical Evidence from a Synthetic Control Model.” Public Administration Review 78, no.1 (2018): 92–103.10.1016/j.chiabu.2011.11.004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lester, L., et al., “Family involvement in a whole-school bullying intervention: Mothers’ and fathers’ communication and influence with children,” Journal of Child and Family Studies 26, no. 10 (2017): 27162727.10.1007/s10826-017-0793-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, W.J. and Dawes, H.C., “Is Fidelity of Implementation of an Anti-Bullying Policy Related to Student Bullying and Teacher Protection of Students?,” Education Sciences 9, no. 2 (2019): 112.10.3390/educsci9020112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stefanilo, M. Jr., “Identity, interrupted: The parental notification requirement of the Massachusetts anti-bullying law,” Tulane Journal of Law & Sexuality 21 (2012): 125.Google Scholar
Haegele, supra note 7; De Pedro, supra note 7.Google Scholar
Hall, supra note 33.Google Scholar
Id.; Hatzenbuehler, M.L., et al., “Associations Between Antibullying Policies and Bullying in 25 States,” JAMA Pediatrics 169, no. 10 (2015):e152411; D. Nikolaou. “Do anti-bullying policies deter in-school bullying victimization?,” International Review of Law and Economics 50 (2017):1–6.10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.2411CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Day, J.K., Snapp, S.D., and Russell, S.T., “Supportive, not punitive, practices reduce homophobic bullying and improve school connectedness,” Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity 3, no. 4 (2016): 416425.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stickl Haugen, J., et al., “School District Anti-Bullying Policies: a State-Wide Content Analysis.” International Journal of Bullying Prevention 2, no. 4 (2020): 309323.10.1007/s42380-019-00055-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welch, K., et al., “Cumulative Racial and Ethnic Disparities Along the School-to-Prison Pipeline.” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 59, no. 5 (2022): 574626; M. Davison, et al., “School Discipline and Racial Disparities in Early Adulthood.” Educational Researcher 51, no. 3 (2022): 231–234.10.1177/00224278211070501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

White et al. supplementary material

White et al. supplementary material
Download White et al. supplementary material(File)
File 99.8 KB