Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-42vt5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-14T01:23:54.420Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Politics of Judicial Retirement in Canada and the United Kingdom

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2022

Tajuana Massie ,
Kirk A. Randazzo  and
Donald R. Songer
Tajuana Massie
Affiliation:
South Carolina State University
Kirk A. Randazzo*
Affiliation:
University of South Carolina
Donald R. Songer
Affiliation:
University of South Carolina
*
Contact the corresponding author, Kirk Randazzo, at randazzo@mailbox.sc.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this study, we test theories of judicial retirement developed in the United States to study patterns of retirement in Canada and England. We explore whether there is evidence that justices time their departures to strategically advance partisan or policy goals. Using survival analysis to examine the career patterns of judges appointed to the Supreme Court of Canada (1875–2012), as well as the House of Lords of the United Kingdom (1875–2009), we find that there is no evidence of strategy to achieve political objectives. Instead, these judges either choose to stay as long as possible or retire for personal reasons.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Law and Courts , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , Fall 2014 , pp. 273 - 299
Copyright
© 2014 by the Law and Courts Organized Section of the American Political Science Association. All rights reserved.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Ackerman, Bruce. 1997. “The Rise of World Constitutionalism.” Virginia University Law Review 83 (4): 771–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, David N. 1976. “Retirement and Death on the United States Supreme Court: From Van Devanter to Douglas.” UMKC Law Review 45:1–27.Google Scholar
Atkinson, David N. 1982. “Bowing to the Inevitable: Supreme Court Deaths and Resignations, 1789–1864.” Arizona State Law Journal 1982:615–40.Google Scholar
Baar, Carl. 1988. “The Courts in Canada.” In The Political Role of Law Courts in Modern Democracies, ed. Waltman, Jerold L. and Holland, Kenneth M.. New York: St. Martin’s.Google Scholar
Banfield, Andrew, and Kerby, Matthew. 2012. “Exit Stage Left: Modelling Judicial Exits in Canada and Australia.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
Barrow, D. J., and Zuk, G.. 1990. “An Institutional Analysis of Turnover in the Lower Federal Courts, 1900–1987.” Journal of Politics 52:457–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., and Jones, Bradford S.. 2004. Event History Modeling: A Guide for Social Scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., and Zorn, Christopher J. W.. 2001. “Duration Models and Proportional Hazards in Political Science.” American Journal of Political Science 45 (October): 972–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brenner, S. 1999. “The Myth That Justices Strategically Retire.” Social Science Journal 36:431–39.Google Scholar
Brodie, Ian. 2002. Friends of the Court: The Privileging of Interest Group Litigants in Canada. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Bushnell, Ian. 1992. The Captive Court: A Study of the Supreme Court of Canada. Montreal: McGill–Queens University Press.Google Scholar
Calabresi, Steven G., and Lindgren, James. 2006. “Term Limits for the Supreme Court: Life Tenure Reconsidered.” Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 29 (3): 769–877.Google Scholar
Epp, Charles R. 1998. The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activists and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, Lee, Knight, Jack, and Martin, Andrew. 2003. “The Norm of Prior Judicial Experience and Its Consequences for Career Diversity on the U.S. Supreme Court.” California Law Review 91:903–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairman, Charles. 1938. “The Retirement of Federal Justices.” Harvard Law Review 51:397–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galligan, Brian. 1987. Politics of the High Court. St. Lucia: University of Queensland Press.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom. 2003. Judicial Review in New Democracies: Constitutional Courts in Asian Cases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagle, T. M. 1993. “Strategic Retirements: A Political Model of Turnover on the United States Supreme Court.” Political Behavior 15:25–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Melinda Gann. 2001. “Voluntary Retirements from State Supreme Courts: Assessing Democratic Pressures to Relinquish the Bench.” Journal of Politics 63 (4): 1112–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansford, Thomas G., Savchak, Elisha, and Songer, Donald. 2010. “Politics, Careerism, and the Voluntary Departures of U.S. District Court Judges.” American Politics Research 38 (6): 986–1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausegger, Lori, and Haynie, Stacia. 2003. “Panel Assignments in Appellate Courts: Influences on Judicial Decision Making in South Africa and Canada.” Law and Society Review 37:635–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausegger, Lori, Hennigar, Matthew, and Riddell, Troy. 2009. Canadian Courts: Law, Politics and Process. Don Mills, ON: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haynie, Stacia L. 2003. Judging in Black and White: Decision Making in the South African Appellate Division, 1950–1990. New York: Lang.Google Scholar
Heard, Andrew D. 1991. “The Charter in the Supreme Court of Canada: The Importance of Which Judges Hear an Appeal.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 24 (June): 289–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Donald W., and Tate, C. Neal. 1992. Comparative Judicial Review and Public Policy. Westport, CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar
King, Gary. 1986. “How Not to Lie with Statistics: Avoiding Common Mistakes in Quantitative Political Science.” American Journal of Political Science 30 (August): 666–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kritzer, Herbert M. 1996. “Courts Justice and Politics in England.” In Courts, Law and Politics in Comparative Perspective, ed. Jacob, Herbert, Blankenburg, Erhard, Kritzer, Herbert M., Provine, Doris Marie, and Sanders, Joseph. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Maitra, P., and Smyth, R.. 2005. “Determinants of Retirement on the High Court of Australia.” Economic Record 81 (254): 193–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nixon, D. C., and Haskin, J. D.. 2000. “Judicial Retirement Strategies: The Judge’s Role in Influencing Party Control of the Appellate Courts.” American Politics Quarterly 28:458–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostberg, C. L., and Wetstein, Matthew E.. 2007. Attitudinal Decision Making in the Supreme Court of Canada. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Ostberg, C. L., Wetstein, Matthew E., and Ducat, Craig R.. 2002. “Attitudinal Dimensions of Supreme Court Decision Making in Canada: The Lamer Court, 1991–1995.” Political Research Quarterly 55 (March): 235–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peck, Sidney. 1969. “A Scalogram Analysis of the Supreme Court of Canada, 1958–1967.” In Comparative Judicial Behavior: Cross-Cultural Studies of Political Decision-Making in the East and West, ed. Schubert, Glendon and Danelski, David J.. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Peretti, Terri. 2007. “Where Have All the Politicians Gone? Recruiting for the Modern Supreme Court.” Judicature 91 (3): 112–22.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard. 1993. “What Do Judges Maximize? The Same Thing Everyone Else Does.” Supreme Court Economic Review 3:1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, David. 1982. “Judicial Ideology in the House of Lords: A Jurimetric Analysis.” British Journal of Political Science 12 (January): 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, David. 1998. Judicial Discretion in the House of Lords. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A., and Spaeth, Harold J.. 2002. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Songer, Donald R. 2008. The Transformation of the Supreme Court of Canada: An Empirical Examination. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Songer, Donald R., and Johnson, Susan W.. 2007. “Judicial Decision Making in the Supreme Court of Canada: Updating the Personal Attribute Model.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 40:911–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Songer, Donald R., Johnson, Susan W., Ostberg, C. L., and Wetstein, Matthew E.. 2012. Law, Ideology, and Collegiality: Judicial Behaviour in the Supreme Court of Canada. Montreal: McGill–Queens University Press.Google Scholar
Songer, Donald, Sheehan, Reginald, and Haire, Susan. 2000. Continuity and Change on the United States Courts of Appeals. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spriggs, J. F., and Wahlbeck, P. J.. 1995. “Calling It Quits: Strategic Retirement on the Federal Court of Appeals, 1893–1991.” Political Research Quarterly 48:573–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squire, P. 1988. “Politics and Personal Factors in Retirement from the United States Supreme Court.” Political Behavior 10:180–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tate, C. Neal. 1972. “Social Background and Voting Behavior in the Philippine Supreme Court.” Lawasia 3 (August–December): 317–38.Google Scholar
Tate, C. Neal, and Sittiwong, Panu. 1989. “Decision Making in the Canadian Supreme Court: Extending the Personal Attributes Model across Nations.” Journal of Politics 51 (November): 900–916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tate, C. Neal, and Vallinder, Torbjörn, eds. 1995. The Global Expansion of Judicial Power. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Vining, R. L. Jr., 2009. “Politics, Pragmatism, and Departures from the U.S. Courts of Appeals, 1954–2004.” Social Science Quarterly 90:834–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, A. 2003. Deciding to Leave: The Politics of Retirement from the Unites States Supreme Court. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Yoon, A. 2006. “Pensions, Politics, and Judicial Tenure: An Empirical Study of Federal Judges, 1869–2002.” American Law and Economics Review 8:143–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zorn, Christopher J. W., and Van Winkle, Steven R.. 2000. “A Competing Risks Model of Supreme Court Vacancies, 1789–1992.” Political Behavior 22:145–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar