Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-k7rjm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-29T21:38:34.471Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Is there sufficient undergraduate interest in head and neck surgery to cover the future disease burden?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2025

Umar Rehman*
Affiliation:
UCL Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, London, UK
Shireen Gohari
Affiliation:
Department of ENT, St Georges Hospital, London, UK
Umar Shafiq
Affiliation:
Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK
Mohammad Sohaib Sarwar
Affiliation:
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, The Queen Victoria Hospital, East Grinstead, UK
Pinky May
Affiliation:
Manchester University hospitals NHS foundation trust, Manchester, UK
Peter A Brennan
Affiliation:
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, UK
*
Corresponding author: Umar Rehman; Email: umar.rehman3@nhs.net

Abstract

Objectives

In recent years, there has been a significant disparity between workforce capacity and clinical demand in surgical specialities, including head and neck surgery (HNS). Our objective was to assess final-year medical student interest in pursuing a career in HNS.

Methods

An online survey was distributed via social media and was completed by 633 final-year medical students across seven United Kingdom (UK) universities.

Results

A total of 66.7 per cent (n = 422) had 1–7 days of exposure to HNS. Complex surgery (24.2 per cent), interesting patient population (20.2 per cent) and complex pathology (16.7 per cent) were the main motivators to consider HNS. Work–life balance (23.8 per cent), lack of exposure (31.3 per cent) and length of training (6.5 per cent) were the most common deterrants. A total of 67.1 per cent of students reported inadequate exposure to the field during undergraduate training.

Conclusion

The undergraduate curriculum must place more emphasis on HNS to accommodate increasing disease burden amid a limited workforce capacity within the National Health Service.

Information

Type
Main Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of J.L.O. (1984) LIMITED.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

Umar Rehman takes responsibility for the integrity of the content of the paper

*

Both Umar Rehman and Shireen Gohari contributed equally to this work and are joint first authors

References

Cass, LM, Smith, JB. The current state of the otolaryngology workforce. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2020;53:915–26Google Scholar
Magennis, P, Begley, A, Dhariwal, DK, Smith, A, Hutchison, I. Oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) consultant workforce in the UK: reducing consultant numbers resulting from recruitment issues, pension pressures, changing job-plans, and demographics when combined with the Covid Backlog in elective surgery, requires urgent action. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2022;60:1419Google Scholar
Hughes, CA, McMenamin, P, Mehta, V, Pillsbury, H, Kennedy, D. Otolaryngology workforce analysis. Laryngoscope 2016;126:S511Google Scholar
British Medical Association. Consultant workforce shortages and solutions. In: https://www.bma.org.uk/media/3429/bma-consultant-workforce-shortages-and-solutions-oct-2020.pdf [10 February 2023]Google Scholar
Erzurum, VZ, Obermeyer, RJ, Fecher, A, Thyagarajan, P, Tan, P, Koler, AK, et al. What influences medical students’ choice of surgical careers. Surgery 2000;128:253–6Google Scholar
Greene, AK, May, JW. Applying to plastic surgery residency: factors associated with medical student career choice. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008;121:1049–53Google Scholar
Ibrahim, M, Fanshawe, A, Patel, V, Goswami, K, Chilvers, G, Ting, M, et al. What factors influence British medical students’ career intentions? Med Teach 2014;36:1064–72Google Scholar
Haggerty, KA, Beaty, CA, George, TJ, Arnaoutakis, GJ, Baumgartner, WA. Increased exposure improves recruitment: early results of a program designed to attract medical students into surgical careers. Ann Thorac Surg 2014;97:2111–4Google Scholar
Raosoft Sample Size Calculator. In: http://www.raosoft.com/samplesize.html [1 June 2025]Google Scholar
Soh, TCF, Lim, ZZ, Yip, HM. Does the UK undergraduate medical curriculum prepare students in oral and maxillofacial surgery? A scoping review. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2020;58:1229–34Google Scholar
Yeom, BW, Hardcastle, T, Wood, AJ. Recruitment to otorhinolaryngology: opportunities abound. Aust J Otolaryngol 2020;3:27Google Scholar
Kielty, PGC, O’Connor, BR, Cotter, CJ, Goodson, AMC, Payne, KFB, Tahim, A. Medical students’ understanding of oral and maxillofacial surgery: an Irish perspective. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2017;55:371–7Google Scholar
Goodson, AMC, Payne, KFB, Tahim, A, Cabot, L, Fan, K. Awareness of oral and maxillofacial surgery as a specialty and potential career pathway amongst UK medical undergraduates. Surgeon 2013;11:92–5Google Scholar
Rehman, U, Sarwar, MS, Brennan, PA. Attitude of clinical medical students to oral and maxillofacial surgery as a career: a perspective from two English medical schools. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2022;60:448–53Google Scholar
Pasha, T, Lumley, ES, Dwyer-Hemmings, L, Fell, M. Undergraduate plastic surgery in the United Kingdom: the students’ perspective. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2020;73:2086–102Google Scholar
Levaillant, M, Levaillant, L, Lerolle, N, Vallet, B, Hamel-Broza, JF. Factors influencing medical students’ choice of specialization: a gender based systematic review. EClinicalMedicine 2020;28:100589Google Scholar
Tulunay-Ugur, OE, Sinclair, CF, Chen, AY. Assessment of gender differences in perceptions of work-life integration among head and neck surgeons. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2019;145:453–8Google Scholar
Contag, SP, Golub, JS, Teknos, TN, Nussenbaum, B, Stack, BC Jr, Arnold, DJ, et al. Professional burnout among microvascular and reconstructive free-flap head and neck surgeons in the United States. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2010;136:950–6Google Scholar
Bhattacharyya, N. The increasing workload in head and neck surgery: an epidemiologic analysis. Laryngoscope 2010;121:111–5Google Scholar