Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-5q6g5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-05T01:31:10.965Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Communication and swallowing outcomes following functional salvage total laryngectomy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2025

Jane Dunton*
Affiliation:
Department of Speech and Language Therapy, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Trust, London, UK
Sally Archer
Affiliation:
Department of Speech and Language Therapy, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Trust, London, UK
Ricard Simo
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Trust, London, UK
*
Corresponding author: Jane Dunton; Email: jane.dunton@gstt.nhs.uk

Abstract

Objectives

Severe laryngeal dysfunction following (chemo)radiotherapy for head and neck cancer may be managed with functional salvage total laryngectomy (FSTL). We investigated communication and swallowing outcomes following FSTL at our tertiary centre.

Methods

All patients treated with FSTL from 2009–2023 were included. Functional Oral Intake Scale score and primary mode of communication were recorded at pre-surgical baseline, point of discharge from inpatient admission, six and 12 months post-surgery.

Results

Ten patients were identified. Pre-surgery all patients were nil by mouth due to severe dysphagia, and 70 per cent were communicating verbally. By 12 months post-surgery, 70 per cent were tolerating full oral intake and 40 per cent were using surgical voice restoration as the primary mode of communication.

Conclusion

Variability in functional outcome must be explained to patients who are offered surgical management of non-functioning larynx, and further work is needed to identify factors that may influence outcome.

Information

Type
Main Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of J.L.O. (1984) LIMITED.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

Jane Dunton takes responsibility for the integrity of the content of the paper

References

Paleri, V, Roland, N. Head and neck cancer: United Kingdom National Multidisciplinary Guidelines. J Laryngol Otol 2016;130:S2Google Scholar
Patterson, JM, McColl, E, Carding, PN, Wilson, JA. Swallowing beyond six years post (chemo)radiotherapy for head and neck cancer; a cohort study. Oral Oncol 2018;83:5358Google Scholar
Hutcheson, KA, Lewin, JS, Barringer, DA, Lisec, A, Brandon, Gunn G, Moore, MWS, et al. Late dysphagia after radiotherapy-based treatment of head and neck cancer. Cancer 2012;118:5793–9Google Scholar
Owadally, W, Hurt, C, Timmins, H, Parsons, E, Townsend, S, Patterson, J, et al. PATHOS: a phase II/III trial of risk-stratified, reduced intensity adjuvant treatment in patients undergoing transoral surgery for Human papillomavirus (HPV) positive oropharyngeal cancer. BMC Cancer 2015;15:602Google Scholar
Nutting, C, Finneran, L, Roe, J, Sydenham, MA, Beasley, M, Bhide, S, et al. Dysphagia-optimised intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus standard intensity-modulated radiotherapy in patients with head and neck cancer (DARS): a phase 3, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2024;24:868–80Google Scholar
Coffey, M, Tolley, N. Swallowing after laryngectomy. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2015;23:202–8Google Scholar
Clarke, P, Radford, K, Coffey, M, Stewart, M. Speech and swallow rehabilitation in head and neck cancer: United Kingdom National Multidisciplinary Guidelines. J Laryngol Otol 2016;130:S17680Google Scholar
Woodman, SH, Govender, R, Baker, K, Glaister, C, Rowe, EA, Dunton, J, et al. Primary mode of communication for people with total laryngectomy in the United Kingdom: a cross-sectional survey. J Laryngol Otol 2024;11:16Google Scholar
Sayles, M, Grant, DG. Preventing pharyngo-cutaneous fistula in total laryngectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Laryngoscope 2013;124:1150–63Google Scholar
Hasan, Z, Dwivedi, RC, Gunaratne, DA, Virk, SA, Palme, CE, Riffat, F. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the complications of salvage total laryngectomy. Eur J Surg Oncol 2017;43:4251Google Scholar
Brunet, A, Rovira, A, Simo, R. Principles of salvage laryngeal surgery. In: Remacle, M, Eckel, HE, eds. Textbook of Surgery of Larynx and Trachea. Cham: Springer, 2022;435–45Google Scholar
Meulemans, J, Demarsin, H, Debacker, J, Batailde, G, Mennes, T, Laenen, A, et al. Functional outcomes and complications after salvage total laryngectomy for residual, recurrent and second primary squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx and hypopharynx: a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Front Oncol 2020;10:1390Google Scholar
Hutcheson, KA, Alvarez, CP, Barringer, DA, Kupferman, ME, Lapine, PR, Lewin, JS. Outcomes of elective total laryngectomy for laryngopharyngeal dysfunction in disease-free head and neck cancer survivors. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2012;146:585–90Google Scholar
Topf, MC, Magaña, LC, Salmon, K, Hamilton, J, Keane, WM, Luginbuhl, A, et al. Safety and efficacy of functional laryngectomy for end-stage dysphagia. Laryngoscope 2018;128:597602Google Scholar
Farlow, JL, Birkeland, AC, Hardenbergh, A, Lyden, T, Brenner, JC, Shuman, AG, et al. Speech and swallowing outcomes after laryngectomy for the dysfunctional irradiated larynx. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2020;277:1459–65Google Scholar
Wu, MP, Goldsmith, T, Holman, A, Kammer, R, Parikh, A, Devore, EK, et al. Risk factors for laryngectomy for dysfunctional larynx after organ preservation protocols: a case-control analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2021;164:608–15Google Scholar
Coviello, CM, Sheehan, C, Hernandez, DJ, Liou, NE, Sandulache, VC, Haskins, AD, et al. Outcome comparison of functional laryngectomy for the dysfunctional larynx to salvage laryngectomy. Laryngoscope 2024;134:222–7Google Scholar
Evangelista, L, Nativ-Zeltzer, N, Bewley, A, Birkeland, AC, Abouyared, M, Kuhn, M, et al. Functional laryngectomy and quality of life in survivors of head and neck cancer with intractable aspiration. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2024;150:335–41Google Scholar
Theunissen, EAR, Timmermans, AJ, Zuur, CL, Hamming-Vrieze, O, de Boer, JP, Hilgers, FJM, et al. Total laryngectomy for a dysfunctional larynx after (chemo)radiotherapy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2012;138:548–55Google Scholar
Olinde, L, Evangelista, L, Bewley, AF. Functional laryngectomy for the dysfunctional larynx: indications and outcomes in setting of prior chemoradiotherapy. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2021;29:473–8Google Scholar
Crary, MA, Carnaby Mann, GD, Groher, ME. Initial psychometric assessment of a functional oral intake scale for dysphagia in stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86:1516–20Google Scholar
Singer, S, Danker, H, Guntinas-Lichius, O, Oeken, J, Pabst, F, Schock, J, et al. Quality of life before and after total laryngectomy: results of a multicenter prospective cohort study. Head Neck 2014;36:359–68Google Scholar
Wulff, NB, Højager, A, Wessel, I, Dalton, SO, Homøe, P. Health-related quality of life following total laryngectomy: a systematic review. Laryngoscope 2021;131:820–31Google Scholar