Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-c75p9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-30T08:31:57.550Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Clinical application of electrolaryngograph for speech rehabilitation in near-total laryngectomy with myo-mucosal valved neoglottis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

Waryam Singh
Waryam Singh*
Affiliation:
Broxburn, west Lothian, Scotland
*
Waryam Singh, F.R.C.S., Consultant Otolaryngologist, Department of Otolaryngology, Bangour General Hospital, Broxburn, West Lothian, Scotland.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Near-total laryngectomy with myomucosal valved neoglottis is the most recent of the various surgical proceedures for speech rehabilitation. The electrolaryngographic wave form (Lx), which was recorded initially to explore the site and mechanism of phonatory function of the neoglottis, has been successfully used in speech rehabilitation of these patients. In a pilot study it was tried as a visual feedback. The results confirm its utility for speech rehabilitation of these laryngectomees.

Information

Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 102 , Issue 4 , April 1988 , pp. 335 - 336
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abberton, E. and Fourcin, A. J. (1984) Electrolaryngography. In Experimental Clinical Phonetics. (Code, C. and Ball, M., eds) pp. 62–78, Croom Helm Ltd., Beckenham, Kent.Google Scholar
Asai, R. (1960) Laryngoplasty. Journal of the Japan Bronchooesophagological Society, 12: 1–3.Google Scholar
Childers, D. G. and Krishnamurthy, A. K. (1985) A critical review of electroglottography. Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering, 12: 131–161.Google ScholarPubMed
Colton, R. H., Brewer, D. W. and Rothenberg, M. (1983) Evaluating vocal fold function. The Journal of Otolaryngology, 12: 291–294.Google ScholarPubMed
Fairbanks, G. (1940) Voice and Articulation Drillbook. Harpers, p. 168.Google Scholar
Singer, M. I. and Blom, E. D. (1980) An endoscopic technique for restoration of voice after laryngectomy. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, 89: 529–533.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singh, W. (1985) New Tracheostoma Flap Valve for surgical speech reconstruction. In New Dimensions in Otorhinolaryngology. Head and Neck Surgery (Myers, E. N., ed.) pp. 480–481, Elsevier Science Publishers B. V. (Biomedical Division) Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Singh, W. (1987) Electrolaryngography in near-total laryngectomy with myomucosal valved neoglottis. Journal of Laryngology and Otology, 101: 815–818CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singh, W. and Hardcastle, P. (1985) Neartotal laryngectomy with myomucosal valved neoglottis. Journal of Laryngology and Otology, 99: 581–588.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Staffieri, M. (1976) La Chirirgia Riabilitiva Delia Voce Dopo Laringectomia Totale. In Associazione Otologi Ospedalieri Italiani XXIX, Congresso Nazionale, Bologna, 5: 222.Google Scholar