Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-p5m67 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-23T08:10:06.616Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Identification of Strains of Heterodera schachtii

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2009

Mary T. Franklin
Mary T. Franklin
Affiliation:
Research Assistant, Institute of Agricultural Parasitology, St. Albans.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Three methods of differentiating the various strains of Heterodera schachtii are tried out in an attempt to find a quick means of identifying the strains.

Infection experiments using possible host plants, though they are the final test of strain, require careful handling and take some weeks to carry out. In a limited number of such experiments a strain of eelworm occurring on wild clovers appears to be distinct from the pea, oat and beet strains. A strain parasitic on Myosotis appears to be distinct from the clover strain.

Information

Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 18 , Issue 2-3 , October 1940 , pp. 63 - 84
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1940

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Franklin, M. T., 1938.—“On the occurrence of Heterodera cysts in various soils and on the roots of Agrostis stolonifera L.” J. Helminth., XVI (1), 5–16. (W.L. 11224b.)Google Scholar
Franklin, M. T., 1939.—“Natural infections of Heterodera schachtii on Clovers in Britain.” J. Helminth., XVII (2), 93–100. (W.L. 11224b.)Google Scholar
Goffart, H., 1928.—“Verwandschaftliche Beziehungen zwischen dem Rüben- und Kartoffelstamm von Heterodera schachtii Schm.” Verh. disch. zool. Ges., XXXII, 238–243. (W.L. 22270.)Google Scholar
Kemner, N. A., 1929.—“Potatisnematoden eller potatisalen (Heterodera schachtii subsp. rostochiensis Woll.)” Medd. CentAnst. Försöksv. Jordbr., Stockh., LVI, 1–76. (W.L. 12819.)Google Scholar
Morgan, D. O., 1925.—“Investigations on eelworm in potatoes in South Lincolnshire.” J. Helminth., III (5), 185–192. (W.L. 11224b.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rensch, B., 1924.—“Eine neue Methode zur Bekämpfung der Rübennematoden.” Mitt. disch. LandwGes., XXXIX, 412–414. (W.L. 13900.)Google Scholar
Schmidt, O., 1930.—“Sind Rüben- und Hafernematoden identisch?” Arch. PflBau., III, 420–464. (W.L. 1789b.)Google Scholar
Thorne, G., 1928.—“Heterodera punctata n. sp. a Nematode parasitic on Wheat Roots from Saskatchewan.” Sci. Agric., VIII (11), 707–710. (W.L. 19968.)Google Scholar
Triffitt, M. J., 1929.—“On the Occurrence and Significance of Heterodera schachtii infesting certain weeds.”—J. Helminth., VII (4), 215–222. (W.L. 11224b.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Triffitt, M. J., 1930.—“On the Bionomics of Heterodera schachtii on Potatoes, with special reference to the Influence of Mustard on the Escape of the Larvae from the Cysts.” J. Helminth., VIII (1), 19–48. (W.L. 11224b.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmermann, H., 1927.—“Versuche über die Kartoffelnematode (Heterodera schachtii forma solani).” Arb. ForschInst. Kartoff., Berl., VIII, 151–154. (W.L. 1646.)Google Scholar