Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-r5d9c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-28T01:12:02.121Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Derivational Suffixes and Suffixoids of Old Saxon: A Panchronic Approach to a Linguistic Category

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2008

Christopher M. Stevens
Christopher M. Stevens
Affiliation:
Department of Germanic Languages and LiteraturesUniversity of California, Los Angeles405 Hilgard AvenueLos Angeles, CA 90095–1539 [stevens@humnet.ucla.edu]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A survey of the literature on Old Saxon derivational suffixes and suffixoids does not yield a neat and clear-cut picture of forms. The reason is that some researchers take a diachronic view of the data, while others take a synchronic view. In this article I recommend a panchronic view of the data in hopes of clarifying the situation. As part of the discussion I argue that affixoids are a good example of grammaticalization. I thus also discuss and—as far as research on German is concerned—aim to resurrect the notion of AFFIXOID as a linguistic category. If successful, the results of this paper may be applied to other languages.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Germanic Linguistics , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , Spring 2000 , pp. 53 - 79
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Germanic Linguistics 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Anreiter, Peter. 1989. Rückläufiges Wörterbuch des Altsächsischen. (Veröffentlichungen der Kommission zur computergestützten Erstellung Linguistischer Hilfsmittel, 1.) Innsbruck: Universitätsverlag Wagner.Google Scholar
Behaghel, Otto. 1965. Heliand und Genesis. 8th edn. (Altdeutsche Textbibliothek, 4.) Tübingen: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bürgisser, Max. 1983. Untersuchungen zur Wortbildung im Althochdeutschen und Altniederdeutschen: Form und Funktion von denominalen Ableitungen in der Benediktinerregel, im Tatian und im Heliand. (Europäische Hochschulschriften. Reihe I. Deutsche Sprache und Literatur, 528.) Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 1995. Diachronic and typological properties of morphology and their implications for representation. Morphological aspects of language processing, ed. by Feldman, Laurie Beth, 225–246. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Carr, Charles T. 1939. Nominal compounds in Germanic. (St. Andrew's University publications, 41.) London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cordes, Gerhard. 1973. Altniederdeutsches Elementarbuch: Wort- und Lautlehre. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Duden, . Das Bedeutungswörterbuch. 1985. 2nd edn. Ed. by Müller, Wolfgang. (Der Duden in 12 Bänden, 10.) Mannheim: Dudenverlag.Google Scholar
Duden, . Grammatik der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. 1995. 5th edn. Ed. by Drosdowski, Günter. (Der Duden in 12 Bänden, 4.) Mannheim: Dudenverlag.Google Scholar
Fleischer, Wolfgang. 1974. Wortbildung der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Fleischer, Wolfgang, and Barz, Irmhild. 1992. Wortbildung der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Claudi, Ulrike, and Hünnemeyer, Friederike. 1991. Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Henzen, Walter. 1965. Deutsche Wortbildung. 3rd edn. Sammlung kurzer Grammatiken germanischer Dialekte, 3. Ergänzungsreihe, 5.) Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Hock, Hans Henrich. 1991. Principles of historical linguistics. 2nd ed.Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holthausen, Ferdinand. 1954. Altsächsisches Wörterbuch. Münster/Köln: Böhlau.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. 1991. On some principles of grammaticalization. In Traugott and Heine (eds.) 1.17–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. and Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1993. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kluge, Friedrich. 1989. Etymologisches Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache. 22nd edn. Ed. by Seebold, Elmar. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Köbler, Gerhard. 1982. Altniederdeutsch-neuhochdeutsches und neuhochdeutsch-altniederdeutsches Wörterbuch. 2nd edn.Giessen-Lahn: Arbeiten zur Rechts- und Sprachwissenschaft Verlag.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. [1982] 1995. Thoughts on grammaticalization. (LINCOM studies in theoretical linguistics, 01.) Munich and Newcastle: LINCOM EUROPA.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 1985. Grammaticalization: Synchronic variation and diachronic change. Lingua e stile 20:303–318.Google Scholar
Lieber, Rochelle. 1995. Review of Hopper and Traugott 1993. The Canadian Journal of Linguistics 40:362–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, G. Ronald. 1992. The Heliand. The Saxon gospel. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rauch, Irmengard. 1992. The Old Saxon language. Grammar, epic narrative, linguistic interference. (Berkeley models of grammars, 1.) New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Günter Dietrich. 1987. Das Affixoid: Zur Notwendigkeit und Brauchbarkeit eines beliebten Zwischenbegriffs der Wortbildung. Deutsche Lehnwortbildung: Beiträge zur Erforschung der Wortbildung mit entlehnten WB-Einheiten im Deutschen, ed. by Wimmer, Raimer and Zifonun, Gisela, 53–101. (Forschungsberichte des Instituts für deutsche Sprache Mannheim, 64.) Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Sehrt, Edward Henry. 1966. Vollständiges Wörterbuch zum Heliand and zur altsächsischen Genesis. 2nd edn. (Hesperia, 14.) Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Stevens, Christopher M. 1995. On the grammaticalization of können, dürfen, sollen, mögen, müssen, and wollen. American Journal of Germanic Linguistics and Literatures 7:179–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Heine, Bernd (eds.). 1991. Approaches to grammaticalization. 2 volumes. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Zanni, Roland. 1985. Wortbildung des Altniederdeutschen (Altsächsischen). Sprachgeschichte: Bin Handbuch zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und ihrer Erforschung, ed. by Besch, Werner et al. , 2.1094–1102. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar