Hostname: page-component-6bb9c88b65-znhjv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-23T07:57:42.281Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Wake-induced vibration of an inelastic cylinder

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2025

Md. Mahbub Alam*
Affiliation:
Center for Turbulence Control, Harbin Institute of Technology (Shenzhen), Shenzhen 518055, PR China
Jian Liu
Affiliation:
Center for Turbulence Control, Harbin Institute of Technology (Shenzhen), Shenzhen 518055, PR China
Yu Zhou
Affiliation:
Center for Turbulence Control, Harbin Institute of Technology (Shenzhen), Shenzhen 518055, PR China
Hongjun Zhu
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, PR China
Chunning Ji
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Hydraulic Engineering Simulation and Safety, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, PR China
*
Corresponding author: Md. Mahbub Alam, alamm28@yahoo.com

Abstract

A systematic study is conducted both experimentally and theoretically on the wake-induced vibration of an inelastic or zero structural stiffness cylinder placed behind a perfectly elastic or rigid cylinder. The mass ratio m* of the inelastic cylinder is 11.1. The spacing ratio L/D is 2.0–6.0, where L is the distance between centers of the two cylinders, and D is the cylinder diameter. The range of Reynolds number Re is 1.97 × 103–1.18 × 104. It has been found that the inelastic cylinder becomes aerodynamically elastic because the cylinder and the fluctuating wake interact, inducing an effective stiffness and thus giving rise to an aeroelastic natural frequency. This frequency depends on the added mass, fluid damping and flow-induced stiffness and is always smaller than the vortex shedding frequency, irrespective of Re and L/D. The wake-induced vibration of the inelastic cylinder may be divided into a desynchronisation branch and a galloping branch. The vibration amplitude jumps greatly at the transition from desynchronisation to galloping for L/D = 2.0–4.5 but not so for L/D = 5.0–6.0. The flow-induced stiffness is linearly correlated with Re, generally higher in the reattachment regime than in the coshedding regime and smaller in galloping than in desynchronisation. Other aspects of the inelastic cylinder are also investigated in detail, including the dependence on Re of the Strouhal numbers, hydrodynamic forces, phase lag between lift and displacement and flow characteristics.

Information

Type
JFM Papers
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

Joint first Authors

References

Alam, M.M., Moriya, M., Takai, K. & Sakamoto, H. 2003 Fluctuating fluid forces acting on two circular cylinders in a tandem arrangement at a subcritical Reynolds number. J. Wind Engng Ind. Aerodyn. 91 (1–2), 139154.10.1016/S0167-6105(02)00341-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alam, M.M. & Sakamoto, H. 2005 Investigation of Strouhal frequencies of two staggered bluff bodies and detection of multistable flow by wavelets. J. Fluids Struct. 20 (3), 425449.10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2004.11.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alam, M M., Sakamoto, H. & Zhou, Y. 2006 Effect of a T-shaped plate on reduction in fluid forces acting on two tandem circular cylinders in a cross-flow. J. Wind Engng Ind. Aerodyn. 94 (7), 525551.10.1016/j.jweia.2006.01.018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alam, M.M. & Meyer, J.P. 2013 Global aerodynamic instability of twin cylinders in cross flow. J. Fluids Struct. 41, 135145.10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2013.03.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alam, M.M. 2014 The aerodynamics of a cylinder submerged in the wake of another. J. Fluids Struct. 51, 393400.10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2014.08.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alam, M.M. 2016 Lift forces induced by phase lag between the vortex sheddings from two tandem bluff bodies. J. Fluids Struct. 65, 217237.10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2016.05.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alam, M.M. 2021 Effects of mass and damping on flow-induced vibration of a cylinder interacting with the wake of another cylinder at high reduced velocities. Energies 14 (16), 5148.10.3390/en14165148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alam, M.M. 2022 A note on flow-induced force measurement of oscillating cylinder by loadcell. Ocean Engng 245, 110538.10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.110538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alam, M.M. 2023 Fluctuating forces on bluff bodies and their relationships with flow structures. Ocean Engng 273, 113870.10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.113870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Assi, G.R., Bearman, P.W. & Meneghini, J.R. 2010 On the wake-induced vibration of tandem circular cylinders: the vortex interaction excitation mechanism. J. Fluid Mech. 661, 365401.10.1017/S0022112010003095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Assi, G.R.S., Bearman, P.W., Carmo, B.S., Meneghini, J.R., Sherwin, S.J. & Willden, R.H.J. 2013 The role of wake stiffness on the wake-induced vibration of the downstream cylinder of a tandem pair. J. Fluid Mech. 718, 210245.10.1017/jfm.2012.606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhatt, R. & Alam, M.M. 2018 Vibrations of a square cylinder submerged in a wake. J. Fluid Mech. 853, 301332.10.1017/jfm.2018.573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blevins, R.D. & Coughran, C.S. 2009 Experimental investigation of vortex-induced vibration in one and two dimensions with variable mass, damping, and Reynolds number. J. Fluids Engng 131 (10), 101202.10.1115/1.3222904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, W., Ji, C., Alam, M.M., Xu, D., An, H., Tong, F. & Zhao, Y. 2022 Flow-induced vibrations of a D-section prism at a low Reynolds number. J. Fluid Mech. 941, A52.10.1017/jfm.2022.314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feng, C.C. 1968 The measurement of vortex induced effects in flow past stationary and oscillating circular and D-section cylinders. Master’s thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.Google Scholar
Govardhan, R. & Williamson, C. 2000 Modes of vortex formation and frequency response of a freely vibrating cylinder. J. Fluid Mech. 420, 85130.10.1017/S0022112000001233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Govardhan, R.N. & Williamson, C.H.K. 2006 Defining the modified Griffin plot in vortex-induced vibration: revealing the effect of Reynolds number using controlled damping. J. Fluid Mech. 561, 147180.10.1017/S0022112006000310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, Z., Wang, J. & Sun, Y. 2020 Cross-flow vibrations of two identical elastically mounted cylinders in tandem arrangement using wind tunnel experiment. Ocean Engng 209, 107501.10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khalak, A. & Williamson, C.H.K. 1996 Dynamics of a hydroelastic cylinder with very low mass and damping. J. Fluids Struct. 10 (5), 455472.10.1006/jfls.1996.0031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khalak, A. & Williamson, C.H.K. 1997 Investigation of relative effects of mass and damping in vortex-induced vibration of a circular cylinder. J. Wind Engng Ind. Aerodyn. 69, 341350.10.1016/S0167-6105(97)00167-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khalak, A. & Williamson, C.H.K. 1999 Motions, forces and mode transitions in vortex-induced vibrations at low mass-damping. J. Fluids Struct. 13 (7–8), 813851.10.1006/jfls.1999.0236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, S., Alam, M.M. & Maiti, D.K. 2018 Wake and suppression of flow-induced vibration of a circular cylinder. Ocean Engng 151, 298307.10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.01.043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, S., Alam, M.M., Sakamoto, H. & Zhou, Y. 2009 Flow-induced vibrations of two circular cylinders in tandem arrangement, part 1: characteristics of vibration. J. Wind Engng Ind. Aerodyn. 97 (5–6), 304311.10.1016/j.jweia.2009.07.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, C. & Alam, M.M. 2024 Intrinsic features of flow-induced stability of square cylinder. J. Fluid Mech. 988, A50.10.1017/jfm.2024.445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mishra, R., Soti, A., Bhardwaj, R., Kulkarni, S.S. & Thompson, M.C. 2020 Transverse vortex-induced vibration of a circular cylinder on a viscoelastic support at low Reynolds number. J. Fluids Struct. 95, 102997.10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2020.102997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morse, T.L., Govardhan, R.N. & Williamson, C.H.K. 2008 The effect of end conditions on the vortex-induced vibration of cylinders. J. Fluids Struct. 24 (8), 12271239.10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2008.06.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morse, T.L. & Williamson, C.H.K. 2009 Fluid forcing, wake modes, and transitions for a cylinder undergoing controlled oscillations. J. Fluids Struct. 25 (4), 697712.10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2008.12.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qin, B., Alam, M.M. & Zhou, Y. 2017 Two tandem cylinders of different diameters in cross-flow: flow-induced vibration. J. Fluid Mech. 829, 621658.10.1017/jfm.2017.510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qin, B., Alam, M.M. & Zhou, Y. 2019 Free vibrations of two tandem elastically mounted cylinders in crossflow. J. Fluid Mech. 861, 349381.10.1017/jfm.2018.913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sakamoto, H. & Haniu, H. 1988 Aerodynamic forces acting on two square prisms placed vertically in a turbulent boundary layer. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 31 (1), 4166.10.1016/0167-6105(88)90187-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sumner, D., Price, S.J. & Paidoussis, M.P. 2000 Flow-pattern identification for two staggered circular cylinders in cross-flow. J. Fluid Mech. 411, 263303.10.1017/S0022112099008137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sumner, D., Richards, M.D. & Akosile, O.O. 2005 Two staggered circular cylinders of equal diameter in cross-flow. J. Fluids Struct. 20 (2), 255276.10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2004.10.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sumner, D. 2010 Two circular cylinders in cross-flow: a review. J. Fluids Struct. 26 (6), 849899.10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2010.07.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, L., Alam, M.M. & Zhou, Y. 2018 Two tandem cylinders of different diameters in cross-flow: effect of an upstream cylinder on wake dynamics. J. Fluid Mech. 836, 542.10.1017/jfm.2017.735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, G. & Zhou, Y. 2004 Strouhal numbers in the wake of two inline cylinders. Exp. Fluids. 37 (2), 248256.10.1007/s00348-004-0808-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zafar, F. & Alam, M.M. 2018 A low Reynolds number flow and heat transfer topology of a cylinder in a wake. Phys. Fluids. 30 (8), 083603.10.1063/1.5035105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zdravkovich, M.M. & Pridden, D.L. 1977 Interference between two circular cylinders; series of unexpected discontinuities. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 2 (3), 255270.10.1016/0167-6105(77)90026-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zheng, Q. & Alam, M.M. 2019 Evolution of the wake of three inline square prisms. Phys. Rev. Fluids. 4 (10), 104701.10.1103/PhysRevFluids.4.104701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Y.F., Alam, S.X., M., M. & Bai, H.L. 2009 Reynolds number effect on the wake of two staggered cylinders. Phys. Fluids. 21 (12), 125105.10.1063/1.3275846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Y. & Alam, M.M. 2016 Wake of two interacting circular cylinders: a review. Intl J. Heat Fluid Flow 62, 510537.10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2016.08.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar