Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-mnl9s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-18T03:50:33.189Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hedge Funds: The Living and theDead

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Abstract

In this paper, I examine survivorship bias in hedgefund returns by comparing two large databases. Ifind that the survivorship bias exceeds 2% per year.Results of survivorship bias by investment stylesindicate that the biases are different acrossstyles. I reconcile the conflicting results aboutsurvivorship bias in previous studies by showingthat the two major hedge fund databases containdifferent amounts of dissolved funds. Empiricalresults show that poor performance is the mainreason for a fund's disappearance. Furthermore, Ifind that there are significant differences in fundreturs, inception date, net assets value, incentivefee, management fee, and investment styles forthe465 common funds covered by both databases.Mismatching between reported returns andthepercentage change in NAVs can partially explain thedifferences in returns.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

*

Weatherhead School of Management, Case WesternReserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106. I thankStephen Brown (the editor), Anurag Gupta, DavidHsieh (the referee), Ji-Chai Lin, Tim Loughran,Ranga Narayanan, Ajai Singh, Sam Thomas, andseminar participants at Case AssociationInternational for helpful comments. The paper wassupported by a research grant from the WeatherheadSchool of Management at Case Western ReserveUniversity. I am grateful of Hedge Fund Research,Inc. and TASS Management Limited for providing thedata.

References

Ackermann, C.; McEnally, R.; and ravenscraft, D.. “The Performance of Hedge Funds: Risk, Return and Incentives.” Journal of Finance, 54 (06 1999), 833874.10.1111/0022-1082.00129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, S. J.; and Goetzmann, W. N.. “Performance Persistence.” Journal of Finance, 50 (06 1995), 679–698.Google Scholar
Brown, S. J.; Goetzmann, W. N.; and Ibbotson, R. G.. “Offshore Hedge Funds: Survivial and Performance 1989–1995”. Journal of Business, 72 (01 1999), 91117.10.1086/209603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, S. J.; Goetzmann, W. N.; and Ibboston, R. G.. “Offshore Hedge Funds: Survival and Performance 1989–1995”. Journal of Business, 72 (01 1999), 91117.10.1086/209603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, S. J.; Goetzmann, W. N.; Ibbotson, R. G.; and Ross, S. A.. “Survivorshipo Bias in Performance Studies”. Review of Financial Studies, 5 (Winter 1992), 553–580.10.1093/rfs/5.4.553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fung, W., and Hsieh, D. A.. “Performance Characteristics of Hedge Funds and CTA Funds: Natural versus Spurious Biases.” Unpubl. Mannuscript, Duke Univ. (1998).Google Scholar
Fung, W., and Hsieh, D. A.. “Empirical Characteristics of Dynamic Trading Strategies: The Case of Hedge Funds.” Review of Financial Studies, 10 (Summer 1997a), 275302.10.1093/rfs/10.2.275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fung, W., and Hsieh, D. A.. “The Information Content of Performance Track Records: Investment Style and Survivorship Bias in the Historical Returns of Commodity Trading Advisors.” Journal of Portfolto Management, 24 (Fall 1997b), 3041.10.3905/jpm.1997.409630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grinblatt, M., and Titman, S., “Mutual Fund Performance: An Analysis of Quarterly Portfolio Hold-ings.” Journal of Business, 62 (07 1989), 393416.10.1086/296468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liang, B. “On the Performance of Hedge Funds.” Financial Analysts Journal, 55 (07/08 1999), 72–85.10.2469/faj.v55.n4.2287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malkiel, B. G. “Returns from Investing in Equity Mutual Funds 1971 to 1991.Journal of Finance, 50 (06 1999), 549–572.Google Scholar
Sharpe, W. F. “Asset Allocation: Management Style and Performance Measurement.” Journal of Portfolto Management, 18 (Winter 1992), 719.10.3905/jpm.1992.409394CrossRefGoogle Scholar