Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-hn9fh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-22T01:48:25.186Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Efficient Algorithms for Conducting Stochastic Dominance Tests on Large Numbers of Portfolios: A Comment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

George M. Frankfurter  and
Herbert E. Phillips
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In their recent paper Porter, Wart, and Ferguson (PWF) [6] discuss the factors which they allege to be responsible for “the time-consuming nature of empirical tests of” stochastic dominance (SD) efficiency relative to Markowitz (EV) efficiency. Based upon their analysis, a number of algorithms for improving computational efficiency are offered. The “tricks” upon which applications would be based are of no concern here. Our concern is with the logical inconsistency of any attempt to compare and contrast SD and EV efficiency criteria on empirical grounds.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , March 1975 , pp. 177 - 179
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

[1]Hadar, Joseph, and Russell, William. “Rules for Ordering Uncertain Prospects.” American Economic Review, Vol. 29 (March 1969), pp. 25–34.Google Scholar
[2]Hanoch, Giora, and Levy, Haim. “The Efficiency Analysis of Choices Involving Risk.” Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 36 (July 1969), pp. 335–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Johansen, Leif. “On the Optimal Use of Forecasts in Economic Policy decisions.” Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 1 (April 1972), pp. 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Markowitz, Harry. Portfolio Selection. New York, 1959.Google Scholar
[5]Myers, Stewart C. “On the Use of 3 in Pegulatory Proceedings: A Comment.” The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, Vol. 3 (Autumn 1972), pp. 622–627.Google Scholar
[6]Porter, Burr; Wart, James; and Ferguson, Donald. “Efficient Algorithms for Conducting Stochastic Dominance Tests on Large Numbers of Portfolios.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 8 (January 1973), pp. 71–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Sharpe, William F. “A Simplified Model for Portfolio Analysis.” Management Science, Vol. 9 (January 1963), pp. 277–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar