Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-r5d9c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-28T00:26:31.621Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Capital Market Equilibrium with Divergent Investment Horizon Length Assumptions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

John E. Gilster Jr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Sharpe-Lintner Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) has always contained an implicit question: what if all investors are single-period wealth maximizers but the length of the single period varies across investors? Gressis, Philappatos, and Hayya (GPH) [7] have pointed out that as the assumption of investment horizon length is changed, the Capital Market Line (CML) intersects the Efficient Frontier (EF) at different points causing different investors to hold different efficient portfolios. GPH assert that these different portfolio holdings will result in an inefficient market portfolio—and dire consequences for the capital market model.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 18 , Issue 2 , June 1983 , pp. 257 - 268
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

[1]Alexander, G. “An Algorithmic Approach to Deriving the Minimum-Variance Zero-Beta Portfolio.” Journal ofFinancial Economics, Vol. 4 (03 1977), pp. 231–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Black, F. “Capital Market Equilibrium with Restricted Borrowing.” Journal of Business, Vol. 45 (07 1972), pp. 444–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Black, F.; Jensen, M.; and Scholes, M.. “The Capital Asset Pricing Model: Some Empirical Tests.” In Studies in the Theory of Capital Markets, Jensen, M., ed. NY: Praeger Publishers (1972).Google Scholar
[4]Brennan, M. “Capital Market Equilibrium with Divergent Borrowing and Lending Rates.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 6 (12 1971), pp. 1197–1206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Friend, I., and Blume, M.. “Measurement of Portfolio Performance under Uncertainty.” American Economic Review, Vol. 60 (09 1970), pp. 561–575.Google Scholar
[6]Gilster, J., “Autocorrelation, Investment Horizon and Efficient Frontier Composition.” The Financial Review (Winter 1979), pp. 23–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Gressis, N.; Philippatos, G.; and Hayya, J.. “Multiperiod Portfolio Analysis and the Inefficiency of the Market Portfolio.” The Journal of Finance, Vol. 31 (09 1976), pp. 1115–1126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Hawawini, G. “Intertemporal Cross-Dependence in Securities Daily Returns and the Short-Run Intervaling Effect on Systematic Risk.’ Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 15 (03 1980), pp. 139–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Jen, F. “Multi-Period Portfolio Strategies.” In Methodology in Finance-Investments, Bicksler, T. L., ed. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books (1972).Google Scholar
[10]Lintner, J. “The Valuation of Risk Assets and the Selection of Risky Investments in Stock Portfolios and Capital Budgets.” Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 47 (02 1965), pp. 13–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Levhari, D., and Levy, H.. “The Capital Asset Pricing Model and the Investment Horizon.” Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 49, (02 1977), pp. 92–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Levy, H. “Portfolio Performance and the Investment Horizon.” Management Science, Vol. 18 (08 1972), pp. B–645–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Miller, M., and Scholes, M.. “Rates of Return in Relation to Risk: A Re-Examination of Some Recent Findings.” In Studies in the Theory of Capital Markets, Jensen, M., ed. NY: Praeger Publishers (1972).Google Scholar
[14]Roll, R. “A Critique of the Asset Pricing Theory's Tests; Part I.” Journal of Financial Economics Vol. 4 (03 1977), pp. 129–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Rosenberg, B., and Ohlson, J.. “The Stationary Distribution of Returns and Portfolio Separation in Capital Markets.’ Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 11 (09 1976), pp. 393–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Ross, S. “The Capital Asset Pricing Model, Short-Sale Restrictions and Related Issues.” Journal of Finance, Vol. 32 (03 1977), pp. 177–184.Google Scholar
[17]Schwartz, R. A., and Whitcomb, D. K.. “The Time Variance Relationship: Evidence on Autocorrelation in Common Stock Returns.” Journal of Finance, Vol. 32 (03 1977), pp. 41–56.Google Scholar
[18]Sharpe, W. “Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium under Conditions of Risk.” Journal of Finance, Vol. 19 (09 1964), pp. 425–442.Google Scholar
[19]Sharpe, W.. Portfolio Theory and Capital Markets. NY: McGrawHill (1970).Google Scholar
[20]Tobin, J. ‘The Theory of Portfolio Selection.’ In The Theory of Interest Rates, Hahn, F. and Breechling, F., eds. London: MacMillian (1965).Google Scholar