Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-hqlzj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-18T03:31:23.061Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Capital Budgeting under Rationing: Comments on the Lusztig and Schwab Procedure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

G. A. Whitmore  and
Lloyd R. Amey
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The interdependence of the optimal investment program and capital prices, when capital and other markets are imperfect, has been one of the least tractable problems in capital budgeting. The nature of the problem is described in Amey [1]. Suggested solutions to the problem may be found in Baumol and Quandt [2], Carleton [3], Hirshleifer [4], Lusztig and Schwab [7], and Weingartner [9]. The purpose of this note is to extend the mathematical results reported by Lusztig and Schwab (L & S) and draw implications that will shed light on the controversy.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , January 1973 , pp. 127 - 135
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

[1]Amey, Lloyd R. “Interdependencies in Capital Budgeting: A Survey.” Journal of Business Finance, vol. 4 (1972), pp. 70–86.Google Scholar
[2]Baumol, W.J., and Quandt, R.E.. “Investment and Discount Rates under Capital Rationing — A Programming Approach.” Economic Journal, vol. 75 (1965), pp. 317–329.Google Scholar
[3]Carleton, W.T. “Linear Programming and Capital Budgeting Models: A New Interpretation.” Journal of Finance, vol. 24 (1969), pp. 825–833.Google Scholar
[4]Hirshleifer, J. “On the Theory of Optimal Investment Decision.” Journal of Political Economy, vol. 64 (1958), pp. 329–352.Google Scholar
[5]Lipsey, R.G., and Lancaster, K.. “The General Theory of Second Best.” Review of Economic Studies, vol. 24 (1956), pp. 11–32.Google Scholar
[6]Lockett, A. Geoffrey, and Tomkins, Cyril. “The Discount Rate Problem in Capital Rationing Situations: Comment.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, vol. 5 (1970), pp. 245–260.Google Scholar
[7]Lusztig, Peter, and Schwab, Bernhard. “A Note on the Application of Linear Programming to Capital Budgeting.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, vol. 3 (1968), pp. 427–431.Google Scholar
[8]Lusztig, Peter. “The Discount Rate Problem in Capital Rationing situations: Reply.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, vol. 5 (1970), p. 261.Google Scholar
[9]Weingartner, H.M. “Criteria for Programming Investment Project Selection.” Journal of Industrial Economics, vol. 15 (1966), pp. 65–76.Google Scholar