Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-fg9bn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-29T05:19:51.863Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Emigration and the Standard of Living: The Seventeenth Century Chesapeake

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2009

Lois Green Carr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Seventeenth-century English immigrants to the Chesapeake and their children experienced a trade-off. They died early and raised few children who survived to adulthood, most worked harder than in England at more boring tasks, and, except for food, they had a material standard of living inferior to what the homeland could offer at equivalent levels of wealth; but people ate well, there was work for all, and until late in the century the poor who lived long enough found opportunities not available in England to exercise control of their lives—opportunities to acquire land and the economic independence and community standing that it brought.

Information

Type
Papers Presented at the Fifty-First Annual Meeting of the Economic History Association
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 52 , Issue 2 , June 1992 , pp. 271 - 291
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Adelman, Irma, and Morris, Cynthia Taft, Economic Growth and Social Equity in Developing Countries (Stanford, CA, 1973).Google Scholar
ArmelagosGeorge, J. George, J., “Health and Disease in Prehistoric Populations in Transition,” in Swedland, Alan C. and Armelagos, George J., eds., Disease in Populations in Transition: Anthropological and Epidemiological Perspectives (New York, 1990) pp. 127–44.Google Scholar
Barley, M. W., “Rural Housing in England,” in Thirsk, Joan, ed., Agrarian History of England and Wales, Volume IV, 1500–1640 (Cambridge, 1967), pp. 696–766.Google Scholar
Bowden, Peter, “Agricultural Prices, Farm Profits, and Rents,” in Thirsk, Joan, ed., The Agrarian History of England and Wales, Volume IV, 1500–1640 (Cambridge, 1967), pp. 593–695.Google Scholar
Browne, William Hand et al. , Archives of Maryland, 1st Ser., 72 vols. (Baltimore, MD, 1883–1972), 3 and 26.Google Scholar
Campbell, Mildred, Rebuttal to Galenson, William and Mary Quarterly, 3d Ser., 35 (1977), pp. 525–40.Google Scholar
Campbell, Mildred, Reply to Galenson, William and Mary Quarterly, 3d Ser., 36 (1978), pp. 277–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, Lois Green, “The Foundations of Social Order: Local Government in Colonial Maryland,” in Daniels, Bruce C., ed., Town and County: Essays on the Structure of Local Government in the American Colonies (Middletown, CT, 1978), pp. 72–110.Google Scholar
Carr, Lois Green, “Diversification in the Colonial Chesapeake: Somerset County, Maryland, in Comparative Perspective,” in Carr, Lois Green, Morgan, Philip D., and Russo, Jean B., eds., Colonial Chesapeake Society (Chapel Hill, 1988), pp. 342–88.Google Scholar
Carr, Lois Green, “Livestock Increase and Its Implications for Diet in the Seventeenth-Century Chesapeake,” St. Mary's City Research Series (St. Mary's City, forthcoming).Google Scholar
Carr, Lois Green, and Menard, Russell R., “Immigration and Opportunity: The Freedman in Early Colonial Maryland,” in Tate, Thad W. and Ammerman, David L., eds., The Chesapeake in the Seventeenth Century: Essays in Anglo-American Society and Politics (Chapel Hill, 1979), pp. 206–42.Google Scholar
Carr, Lois Green, and Menard, Russell R., “Land, Labor, and Economies of Scale in Early Maryland: Some Limits to Growth in the Chesapeake System of Husbandry,” this Journal 49 (1989), pp. 407–18.Google Scholar
Carr, Lois Green, Menard, Russell R., and Walsh, Lorena S., Robert Cole's World: Agriculture and Society in Early Maryland (Chapel Hill, 1991).Google Scholar
Carr, Lois Green, and Walsh, Lorena S., “The Planter's Wife: The Experience of White Women in Seventeenth-Century Maryland,” William and Mary Quarterly, 3d Ser., 34 (1977), pp. 542–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, Lois Green, and Walsh, Lorena S., “Changing Life Styles and Consumer Behavior in the Colonial Chesapeake,” in Carson, Cary, Hoffman, Ronald, and Albert, Peter J., eds., Of Consuming Interests: The Style of Life in the Eighteenth Century (Charlottesville, VA, forthcoming).Google Scholar
Carson, Cary, Barka, Norman F., Kelso, William M., Stone, Garry Wheeler, and Upton, Dell, “Impermanent Architecture in the Southern American Colonies,” Winterthur Portfolio, 16 (1981), pp. 135–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Gregory, “Economics of Nitrogen, the Postan Thesis, and the Agricultural Revolution,” Agricultural History Center, University of California (Davis), Working Paper Series No. 62 (12 1990).Google Scholar
Clay, Christopher, “Landlords and Estate Management in England,” in Thirsk, Joan, ed., The Agrarian History of England and Wales, Volume V.II, 1640–1750: Agrarian Change (Cambridge, 1985).Google Scholar
Cohen, Mark N., “Paleopathology and the Interpretations of Economic Change in Prehistory,” in Lamberg-Karlovsy, C. C., ed., Archeological Thought in America (Cambridge, 1989), pp. 117–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Mark Nathan, and Armelagos, George J., eds., Paleopathology at the Origins of Agriculture (Orlando, FL, 1984).Google Scholar
Cosman, Madeleine Peter, Fabulous Feasts: Medieval Cookery and Ceremony (New York, 1976).Google Scholar
Dankers, Jaspar, and Sluyter, Peter, Journal of a Voyage to New York and a Tour in Several of the American Colonies in 1679–80 by Jaspar Dankers and Peter Sluyter of Wieward in Friesland, trans. Murphy, Henry C. (Brooklyn, NY, 1867).Google Scholar
Engerman, Stanley L., “Reflections on the ‘Standard of Living Debate,’” in John James and Mark Thomas, eds., Capitalism in Context (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Everitt, Alan, “Farm Laborers,” in Thirsk, Joan, ed., The Agrarian History of England and Wales, Volume IV, 1500–1640 (Cambridge, 1967), pp. 396–592.Google Scholar
FAO/WHO (Food and Agricultural Organization/World Health Organization), Energy and Protein Requirements, Report of a Joint FAO/WHO Expert Consultation, World Health Organization, Technical Report Series, 724 (Geneva, 1985).Google Scholar
Fogel, Robert W., Engerman, Stanley L., Floud, Roderick, Friedman, Gerald, Margo, Robert A., Sokoloff, Kenneth, Steckel, Richard H., Trussell, James T., Villaflor, Georgia, and Wachter, Kenneth W., “Secular Changes in American and British Stature and Nutrition,” Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 14 (1983), pp. 445–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fogel, Robert William, “Nutrition and the Decline in Mortality since 1700: Some Preliminary Findings,” in Engerman, Stanley L. and Gallman, Robert E., eds., Long-Term Factors in American Economic Growth, National Bureau of Economic Research, Studies in Income and Wealth, Vol. 51 (Chicago, IL, 1986), pp. 439–55.Google Scholar
Fogel, Robert William, “Biomedical Approaches to the Estimation and Interpretation of Secular Trends in Equity, Morbidity, Mortality, and Labor Productivity in Europe, 1750–1980” (unpublished draft, 1987).Google Scholar
“Forum: Towards a History of the Standard of Living in British North America,” William and Mary Quarterly, 3d Ser., 45 (1988), 118–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galenson, David W., “‘Middling People’ or ‘Common Sort’? The Social Origins of Some Early Americans Reexamined,” William and Mary Quarterly, 3d Ser., 35 (1978), pp. 499–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galenson, David W., “The Social Origins of Some Early Americans: Rejoinder,” William and Mary Quarterly, 3d Ser., 36 (1979), pp. 264–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallman, Robert E. and Wallis, John Joseph, eds., American Economic Growth and the Standard of Living before the Civil War (Chicago, forthcoming).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartwell, R. M., “The Rising Standard of Living in England, 1800–1850,” Economic History Review, 13 (1961), pp. 397–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartwell, R. M., “The Standard of Living,” Economic History Review, 16 (1963), pp. 135–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartwell, R. M., “The Standard of Living Controversy: A Summary,” in Hartwell, R. M., ed., The Industrial Revolution (Oxford, 1970), pp. 167–79.Google Scholar
Hawthorne, Geoffrey, ed., The Standard of Living (Cambridge, 1987).Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, E. J., “The British Standard of Living, 1790–1850,” Economic History Review, 10 (1957), pp. 46–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobsbawm, E. J., “The Standard of Living during the Industrial Revolution: A Discussion,” Economic History Review, 16 (1963), pp. 119–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holderness, B. A., Pre-Industrial England: Economy and Society, 1500–1750 (Totowa, NJ, 1976).Google Scholar
Holmes, George K., “Statistics of Live Stock, Meat Production and Consumption, Prices, and International Trade for Many Countries,” in United States Department of Agriculture, Office of the Secretary, “Meat Situation in the United States,” Report No. 109, Part I. (Washington, D.C., 1916).Google Scholar
Horn, James P. P., “Servant Emigration to the Chesapeake in the Seventeenth Century,” in Tate, Thad W. and Ammerman, David L., eds., The Chesapeake in the Seventeenth Century: Essays on Anglo-American Society & Politics (Chapel Hill, 1979), pp. 51–95.Google Scholar
Horn, James P. P., “Adapting to a New World: A Comparative Study of Local Society in England and Maryland,” in Carr, Lois Green, Morgan, Philip D., and Russo, Jean B., eds., Colonial Chesapeake Society (Chapel Hill, 1988), pp. 133–75.Google Scholar
Horn, James P. P., Adapting to a New World: English Society in the Seventeenth-Century Chesapeake (Chapel Hill, forthcoming).Google Scholar
Hoskins, William G., “The Rebuilding of Rural England, 1570–1640,” Past and Present, 4 (1953), pp. 44–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, David W., Foundations of Representative Government in Maryland, 1632–1715 (Cambridge, 1987).Google Scholar
Kingsbury, Susan M., ed., The Records of the Virginia Company of London, 3 (Washington, D.C., 1933).Google Scholar
Komlos, John, “The Height and Weight of West Point Cadets: Dietary Change in Antebellum America,” this Journal, 47 (1987), pp. 897–927.Google Scholar
Kuznets, Simon, “Modern Economic Growth: Findings and Reflections,” in Kuznets, Simon, Population, Capital, and Growth: Selected Essays (New York, 1973), pp. 165–84.Google Scholar
Lindert, Peter H., “Unequal English Wealth since 1670,” Journal of Political Economy, 94 (1986), pp. 1127–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindert, Peter H., “Unequal Living Standards,” in Floud, Roderick and McCloskey, Donald, eds., The Economic History of Britain since 1700, 2nd ed., Vol. 1 (Cambridge, forthcoming).Google Scholar
Lindert, Peter H., and Williamson, Jeffrey G., “Revising England's Social Tables, 1688–1812,” Explorations in Economic History, 19 (1982), pp. 385–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindert, Peter H. and Williamson, Jeffrey G., “English Workers' Living Standards During the Industrial Revolution: A New Look,” Economic History Review, 36 (1983), pp. 1–25.Google Scholar
Main, Gloria L., Tobacco Colony: Life in Early Maryland (Princeton, NJ, 1982).Google Scholar
Markham, Gervase, The English Housewife, Containing the Inward and Outward Virtues which ought to be in a Complete Women …, Best, Michael R., ed. (Montreal, 1986).Google Scholar
McCusker, John J. and Menard, Russell R., The Economy of British America, 1607–1689 (Chapel Hill, 1985).Google Scholar
Menard, Russell R., “From Servant to Freeholder: Status Mobility and Property Accumulation in Seventeenth-Century Maryland,” William and Mary Quarterly, 3d Ser., 30 (1973), pp. 37–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menard, Russell R., “Economy and Society in Early Colonial Maryland” (Ph.D. diss., University of Iowa, 1975).Google Scholar
Menard, Russell R., “Immigrants and Their Increase: The Process of Population Growth in Early Colonial Maryland,” in Land, Aubrey C., Carr, Lois Green, and Papenfuse, Edward C., eds., Law, Society, and Politics in Early Maryland (Baltimore, MD, 1977), pp. 88–110.Google Scholar
Menard, Russell R., “British Migration to the Chesapeake Colonies in the Seventeenth Century,” in Carr, Lois Green, Morgan, Philip D., and Russo, Jean B., eds., Colonial Chesapeake Society (Chapel Hill, 1988), pp. 99–132.Google Scholar
Menard, Russell R., and Walsh, Lorena S., “The Demography of Somerset County, Maryland: A Progress Report,” Newberry Papers in Family and Community History, 81–2 (1981).Google Scholar
Miller, Henry M., “An Archaeological Perspective on the Evolution of Diet in the Colonial Chesapeake, 1620–1745,” in Carr, Lois Green, Morgan, Philip D., and Russo, Jean B., eds., Colonial Chesapeake Society (Chapel Hill, 1988), pp. 176–99.Google Scholar
Pollard, Sydney, “Sheffield and Sweet Auburn—Amenities and Living Standards in the British Industrial Revolution: A Comment,” this Journal, 41 (1981), pp. 902–4.Google Scholar
Rutman, Darrett B. and Anita, H., “‘Now Wives and Sons-in-Law’: Parental Death in a Seventeenth-Century Virginia County,” in Tate, That W. and Ammerman, David L., eds., The Chesapeake in the Seventeenth Century: Essays on Anglo-American Society (Chapel Hill, 1979), pp. 153–82.Google Scholar
Rutman, Darrett B. and Anita, H., “Of Agues and Fevers: Malaria in the Early Chesapeake,” William and Mary Quarterly, 3d Ser., 33 (1976), pp. 31–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rutman, Darrett B. and Anita, H., A Place in Time, Explicatus (New York, 1984).Google Scholar
Salerno, Anthony, “The Social Background of Seventeenth-Century Emigration to America,” Journal of British Studies, 10 (1979–1980), pp. 31–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Daniel Blake, “Mortality and the Family in Colonial Chesapeake,” Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 8 (1978), pp. 403–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Social Science History, 6 (1982).Google Scholar
Sokoloff, Kenneth L., and Villaflor, Georgia C., “The Early Achievement of Modern Stature in America,” Social Science History, 6 (1982), pp. 453–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Souden, David, “Rogues, Whores, and Vagabonds: Servant Emigrants to North America and the Case of Mid-Seventeenth-Century Bristol,” Social History, 3 (1978), pp. 23–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steckel, Richard H., “Stature and Living Standards in the United States,” in Gallman, Robert E. and Wallis, John Joseph, eds., American Economic Growth and the Standard of Living before the Civil War (Chicago, forthcoming).Google Scholar
Steckel, Richard H., and Rose, Jerome C., “Bioarcheology and the Reinterpretation of the Past: A Research Project on the History of Health and Nutrition in the Western Hemisphere” (ms. in possession of the authors).Google Scholar
Stiverson, Gregory A., and Butler, Patrick H. III, eds., “Virginia in 1732: The Travel Journal of William Hugh Grove,” Virginia Magazine of History and Biography, 85 (1977), 18–44.Google Scholar
Thirsk, Joan, Economic Policy and Projects: The Development of a Consumer Society in Early Modern England (London, 1987).Google Scholar
Walsh, Lorena S., “Charles County, Maryland, 1658–1705: A Study of Chesapeake Social and Political Structure” (Ph.D. diss., Michigan State University, 1977).Google Scholar
Walsh, Lorena S., “The Development of Local Power Structures: Maryland's Lower Western Shore in the Early Colonial Period,” in Daniels, Bruce C., ed., Power and Status: Officeholding in Colonial America (Middletown, CT, 1986), pp. 53–71.Google Scholar
Walsh, Lorena S., ‘“To Labor for Profit’: Plantation Management in the Chesapeake, 1620–1820” (ms. in progress).Google Scholar
Walsh, Lorena S., and Menard, Russell R., “Death in the Chesapeake: Two Life Tables for Men in Early Colonial Maryland,” Maryland Historical Magazine, 69 (1974), pp. 211–25.Google ScholarPubMed
Watt, Bernice K., Composition of Foods: Raw, Processed, Prepared, Agricultural Handbook No. 8 (Washington, D.C., 1950).Google Scholar
Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary (Springfield, MA, 1953).Google Scholar
Williamson, Jeffrey G., “Urban Disamenities, Dark Satanic Mills, and the British Standard of Living Debate,” this Journal, 41 (1981), pp. 75–83.Google Scholar
Williamson, Jeffrey G., “Some Myths Die Hard—Urban Disamenities One more Time: A Reply,” this Journal, 41 (1981), pp. 905–7.Google Scholar
Williamson, Jeffrey G., Did British Capitalism Breed Inequality (Boston, 1985).Google Scholar
Williamson, Jeffrey G., “Debating the Industrial Revolution,” Explorations in Economic History, 24 (1987), pp. 269–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wrigley, E. A. and Schofield, R. S., The Population History of England, 1541–1871: A Reconstruction (Cambridge, MA, 1981).Google Scholar
Zupko, Ronald Edward, British Weights and Measures: A History from Antiquity to the Seventeenth Century (Madison, WI, 1977).Google Scholar