Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-mwwwr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-29T09:12:10.196Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Bondsman's Burden: An Economic Analysis of the Jurisprudence of Slaves and Common Carriers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2009

Jenny Bourne Wahl
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Antebellum judges played crucial roles in resolving conflicts between slaveowners and common-carrier owners. Because courts could easily quantify the value of a slave's life, they were quicker to compensate slaveowners for slaves injured or killed by a common carrier than to award damages to an injured free person or his estate. Yet judges also had to craft rules governing the behavior of the slave property itself. By the 1860s, Southern courts had established law that encouraged parties with legal standing to act efficiently. Strikingly, tort doctrines developed in slave cases foreshadowed the evolution of law for free accident victims.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 53 , Issue 3 , September 1993 , pp. 495 - 526
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Aitken, Hugh, Did Slavery Pay? (Boston, 1971).Google Scholar
American Digest, Century Edition (St. Paul, 1899).Google Scholar
American Jurisprudence, Second Edition (Rochester, NY, 1980).Google Scholar
Barzel, Yoram, “An Economic Analysis of Slavery,” Journal of Law and Economics, 20 (04, 1977), pp. 87–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bureau of the Census, Historical Statistics of the United States, 1789–1945 (Washington, DC, 1975).Google Scholar
Calabresi, Guido, The Costs of Accidents (New Haven, 1971).Google Scholar
Campbell, Stanley, The Slave Catchers (Chapel Hill, 1968).Google Scholar
Catterall, Helen, Judicial Cases concerning American Slavery and the Negro (Reprint, New York, 1968).Google Scholar
Coase, Ronald, “The Problem of Social Cost,” Journal of Law and Economics, 3 (10. 1960), pp. 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conrad, Alfred, and Meyer, John, Economics of Slavery in the Ante-bellum South (Chicago, 1964).Google Scholar
Cooter, Robert, and Ulen, Thomas, Law and Economics (Glenview, IL, 1988).Google Scholar
Corpus Juris Secundum (Brooklyn, 1948).Google Scholar
Cover, Robert, Justice Accused: Antislavery and the Judicial Process (New Haven, 1975).Google Scholar
Craven, Avery, The Coming of the Civil War (2nd edn., Chicago, 1966).Google Scholar
David, Paul et al. , Reckoning with Slavery (New York, 1976).Google Scholar
Dumond, Dwight, Antislavery Origins of the Civil War (Ann Arbor, 1959).Google Scholar
Elkins, Stanley, Slavery (3rd edn., Chicago, 1976).Google Scholar
Fede, Andrew, “Legal Protection for Slave Buyers in the U.S. South: A Caveat concerning Caveat Emptor,” American Journal of Legal History, 31 (10. 1987), pp. 322–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehrenbacher, Don, The Era of Expansion, 1800–1848 (New York, 1969).Google Scholar
Fehrenbacher, Don, Slavery, Law, and Politics (New York, 1981).Google Scholar
Finkelman, Paul, An Imperfect Union (Chapel Hill, 1981).Google Scholar
Finkelman, Paul, Slavery in the Courtroom (Washington, DC, 1985).Google Scholar
Finkelman, Paul, “Northern Labor Law and Southern Slave Law: The Application of the Fellow Servant Rule to Slaves,” National Black Law Journal, 11 (Summer 1989), pp. 212–32.Google Scholar
Finkin, Matthew, Goldman, Alvin, and Summers, Clyde, Legal Protection for the Individual Employee (St. Paul, 1989).Google Scholar
Fishlow, Albert, American Railroads and the Transformation of the Antebellum Economy (Cambridge, MA, 1965).Google Scholar
Flanigan, Daniel, The Criminal Law of Slavery and Freedom, 1800–68 (New York, 1947).Google Scholar
Fogel, Robert, Without Consent or Contract: The Rise and Fall of American Slavery (New York, 1989).Google Scholar
Fogel, Robert, and Engerman, Stanley, Time on the Cross (Boston, 1974).Google Scholar
Franklin, John Hope, From Slavery to Freedom (6th edn., New York, 1988).Google Scholar
Friedman, Lawrence, History of American Law (2nd edn., New York, 1985).Google Scholar
Genovese, Eugene, The Political Economy of Slavery (2nd edn., Middletown, CT, 1989).Google Scholar
Goodell, William, The American Slave Code (New York, 1853).Google Scholar
Grady, Mark, “Toward a Positive Theory of Antitrust,” Economic Inquiry, 30 (04. 1992), pp. 225–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hewes, Fletcher, “Statistical Railway Studies,” in Cooley, Thomas, ed., The American Railway (New York, 1897), pp. 425–48.Google Scholar
Higginbotham, A. Leon, and Kopytoff, Barbara, “Property First, Humanity Second: The Recognition of Slaves' Human Nature in Virginia Common Law,” Ohio State Law Journal, 50 (No. 3, 1989), pp. 511–40.Google Scholar
Horwitz, Morton, The Transformation of American Law 1780–1860 (Cambridge, MA, 1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurd, John, Law of Freedom and Bondage in the United States, 2 vols. (Boston, 1858).Google Scholar
Hyman, Harold, and Wiecek, William, Equal Justice under Law 1835–75 (New York, 1982).Google Scholar
Kirkland, Edward, Industry Comes of Age: Business, Labor, and Public Policy, 1860–1897 (Chicago, 1961).Google Scholar
Landes, William, and Posner, Richard, The Economic Structure of Tort Law (Cambridge, MA, 1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCurdy, Charles, “Justice Field and the Jurisprudence of Government and Business Relations,” Journal of American History, 61 (03. 1975), pp. 970–1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McPherson, James, Abraham Lincoln and the Second American Revolution (New York, 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malone, Wex, “The Genesis of Wrongful Death,” Stanford Law Review, 17 (07 1965), pp. 1043–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malone, Wex, “The Formative Era of Contributory Negligence,” in Holt, Wythe, ed., Essays in Nineteenth Century American Legal History (Westport, CT, 1976), pp. 267–300.Google Scholar
Minneapolis Star-Tribune (07 26, 1991), p. IB.Google Scholar
Morris, Thomas, Free Men All (Baltimore, 1974).Google Scholar
Nevins, Allan, Ordeal of the Union: Fruits of Manifest Destiny (New York, 1947).Google Scholar
Oakes, James, The Ruling Race: A History of American Slaveholders (New York, 1982).Google Scholar
O'Hara, Erin, “Hedonic Damages for Wrongful Death: Are Tortfeasors Getting Away with Murder?;” Georgetown Law Journal, 78 (06 1990), pp. 1687–1721.Google Scholar
Peterson, Merrill, The Great Triumvirate (New York, 1987).Google Scholar
Posner, Richard, “A Theory of Negligence,” Journal of Legal Studies, 1 (01. 1972), pp. 29–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, Richard, Tort Law (Boston, 1982).Google Scholar
Posner, Richard, Economic Analysis of Law (3rd edn., Boston, 1986).Google Scholar
Posner, Richard, and Rosenfield, Andrew, “Impossibility and Related Doctrines in Contract Law: An Economic Analysis,” Journal of Legal Studies, 6 (01 1977), pp. 83–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prosser, William, Law of Torts (4th edn., St. Paul, 1971).Google Scholar
Ransom, Roger, and Sutch, Richard, One Kind of Freedom (New York, 1977).Google Scholar
Roark, James, Masters Without Slaves (New York, 1977).Google Scholar
Schafer, Judith, “Guaranteed against the Vices and Maladies Prescribed by Law: Consumer Protection, the Law of Slave Sales, and the Supreme Court in Antebellum Louisiana,” American Journal of Legal History, 30 (10., 1987), pp. 306–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, Bernard, The Law in America (New York, 1974).Google Scholar
Schwartz, Gary, “Tort Law and the Economy in Nineteenth Century America: A Reinterpretation,” Yale Law Journal, 90 (07 1981), pp. 1717–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soltow, Lee, Men and Wealth in the United States, 1850–1870 (New Haven, 1975).Google Scholar
Stover, John, American Railroads (Chicago, 1961).Google Scholar
Stroud, George, A Sketch of the Laws Relating to Slavery in the Several States of the U.S.A. (2nd edn., Philadelphia, 1856).Google Scholar
Taylor, George Rogers, “Comment,” in Parker, William, ed., Trends in the American Economy in the Nineteenth Century, Studies in Income and Wealth (Princeton, 1981), vol. 24, pp. 524–44.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark, The American Law of Slavery, 1810–60: Considerations of Humanity and Interest (Princeton, 1981).Google Scholar
Wheeler, Jacob, A Practical Treatise on the Law of Slavery (New York, 1837).Google Scholar
White, G. Edward, “The Appellate Opinion as Historical Source Material,” Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 1 (Spring 1971), pp. 491–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, G. Edward, Tort Law in America: An Intellectual History (New York, 1980).Google Scholar
Wiecek, William, The Sources of Antislavery Constitutionalism in America 1760–1848 (Ithaca, 1977).Google Scholar
Wooster, Ralph, Politicians, Planters, and Plain Folk: Courthouse and Statehouse in the Upper South 1850–60 (Knoxville, 1975).Google Scholar
Wright, Gavin, Old South, New South (New York, 1986).Google Scholar
Wright, Gavin, The Political Economy of the Cotton South (New York, 1978).Google Scholar
Zainaldin, Jamil, Law in Antebellum Society (New York, 1983).Google Scholar