Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-sdd8f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-14T04:55:39.804Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Configurational studies on family exchanges

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2022

Eric D. Widmer
Eric D. Widmer*
Affiliation:
Université de Genève Faculté des Sciences de la Société, Geneve, Switzerland
*
Corresponding author. E-mail: eric.widmer@unige.ch
Get access

Abstract

The configurational studies of this special issue trace complex patterns of interdependencies existing among family members and beyond households. They focus on the functional connections among spouses, children, siblings, and other relatives living in a variety of households. The main goal of this special issue is to reveal how some key decisions and exchanges occurring in family dyads, such as the marital and parent–child dyads, are embedded within a larger set of family and interpersonal exchanges that constitute configurations of their own in a variety of contexts.

Keywords

Family configurations

Information

Type
Introduction
Information
Journal of Demographic Economics , Volume 88 , Special Issue 2: Exchanges in Family and Personal Configurations Beyond the Household , June 2022 , pp. 157 - 165
Copyright
Copyright © Université catholique de Louvain 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bengtson, Vern L. (2001) Beyond the nuclear family: the increasing importance of multigenerational bonds (The Burgess Award Lecture). Journal of Marriage and Family 63(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, Ronald S. (2001) The social capital of structural e holes. In Guillén, Mauro F., Collins, Randall, England, Paula, and Meyer, Marshall (eds.), New Directions in Economic Sociology, pp. 148–192. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Coleman, James S. (1988) Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology 94, S95–S120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornwell, Benjamin (2011) Independence through social networks: bridging potential among older women and men. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B 66B(6), 782–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cullati, Stephane, Kliegel, Mattias and Widmer, Eric D. (2018) Development of reserves over the life course and onset of vulnerability in later life. Nature Human Behaviour 2(8), 551–558.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Bel, Vera and Widmer, Eric D. (2021) Nuclear family. The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology, 1–3.Google Scholar
De Vos, Susan and Palloni, Alberto (1989) Formal models and methods for the analysis of kinship and household organization. Population Index, 55(2), 174–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durkheim, Emile (1895, reedition 2005) Suicide: A Study in Sociology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Elias, Norbert (1994) The Civilizing Process. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ernst Staehli, Michele, Joye, Dominique, Sapin, Marlène, Pollien, Alexandre, Dümmler, Kristin and Kessler, Dorian (2014) MOSAiCH: Enquête sur la famille et le changement des rôles homme-femme, l'identité nationale et la citoyenneté—2013 [Dataset]. FORS—Centre de compétences suisse en sciences sociales, Lausanne. Distributed by FORS, Lausanne, 2014.Google Scholar
Freeman, Linton C. (1978) Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks 1(3), 215–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furstenberg, Franck F. (2020) Kinship reconsidered: research on a neglected topic. Journal of Marriage and Family 82(1), 364–382.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hanneman, Robert A. and Riddle, Mark (2005) Introduction to Social Network Methods V Riverside. Riverside, CA: University of California.Google Scholar
Ibarra, Herminia and Andrews, Stefen (1993) Power, social influence, and sense making: effects of network centrality and proximity on employee perceptions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 277–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, Talcott and Bales, Robert (1955) Family, Socialization and Interaction Process. Illinois: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Scott, John (2017) Social Analysis. London: Sage, 4th edition.Google Scholar
Spini, Dario, Bernardi, Laura and Oris, Michel (2017) Toward a life course framework for studying vulnerability. Research in Human Development 14(1), 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wasserman, Stanley and Faust, Katherine (1994) Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widmer, Eric D. (2006) Who are my family members? Bridging and bonding social capital in family configurations. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 23, 979–998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widmer, Eric D. (2016, reedition) Family Configurations: A Structural Approach to Family Diversity. London, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widmer, Eric D. (2021) The configurational approach to families: methodological suggestions. In The Palgrave Handbook of Family Sociology in Europe, pp. 107–131. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widmer, Eric D., Aeby, Gaëlle and Sapin, Marlène (2013) Collecting family network data. International Review of Sociology 23, 27–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widmer, Eric D., Giudici, Francesco, Le Goff, Jean-Marie and Pollien, Alexandre (2009) From support to control: a configurational perspective on conjugal quality. Journal of Marriage and Family 71(3), 437–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar