Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-scsgl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-02T07:11:39.192Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Who is the “boss” in planning to have a baby? Fertility and household bargaining in China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2025

Jie Ma ,
Xiaojun Yang Open the ORCID record for Xiaojun Yang [Opens in a new window]  and
Yuxuan Fei
Jie Ma
Affiliation:
Jinhe Center for Economic Research, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
Xiaojun Yang*
Affiliation:
School of Public Policy and Administration, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
Yuxuan Fei
Affiliation:
School of Public Policy and Administration, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
*
Corresponding author: Xiaojun Yang; Email: xjyang@xjtu.edu.cn
Get access

Abstract

Although fertility is typically regarded as a unitary family decision, a meaningful degree of disagreement in fertility willingness exists within households, especially for having two or more children. As China transitioned from a one-child to multiple-child policy, understanding how such disagreement affects fertility decisions is crucial. Using household data from the 2016 China Labor-force Dynamic Survey, we analyze fertility willingness in married couples. We find that over 10% of families disagree on having two or more children. Disagreement negatively impacts plans to have more children: only the husband wanting two children significantly reduces fertility plans compared to mutual agreement, while only the wife wanting two children does not suppress the plan. This is consistent with the wife's veto power in fertility decisions. Heterogeneity analyses reveal that more equal gender role and higher bargaining power contribute to the wife's veto power, offering insights into the mechanism of intra-household fertility decisions.

Keywords

fertilityfertility willingnessfertility disagreementhousehold bargainingChina

JEL classification

D10: General J13: Fertility • Family Planning • Child Care • Children • Youth

Information

Type
Research Paper
Information
Journal of Demographic Economics , First View , pp. 1 - 21
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with Université catholique de Louvain

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-TCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ajzen, I., & Klobas, J. (2013). Fertility intentions: An approach based on the theory of planned behavior. Demographic Research, 29(8), 203–232.10.4054/DemRes.2013.29.8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.-S. (2009). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist’s companion. Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400829828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashraf, N., Field, E., & Lee, J. (2014). Household bargaining and excess fertility: An experimental study in Zambia. American Economic Review, 104(7), 2210–2237.10.1257/aer.104.7.2210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bankole, A. (1995). Desired fertility and fertility behaviour among the Yoruba of Nigeria: A study of couple preferences and subsequent fertility. Population Studies, 49(2), 317–328.10.1080/0032472031000148536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baudin, T., De La Croix, D., & Gobbi, P. E. (2015). Fertility and childlessness in the United States. American Economic Review, 105(6), 1852–1882.10.1257/aer.20120926CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Becker, G. S. (1973). A theory of marriage: Part I. Journal of Political Economy, 81(4), 813–846.10.1086/260084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, G. S., & Barro, R. J. (1988). A reformulation of the economic theory of fertility. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 103(1), 1–25.10.2307/1882640CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Billari, F. C., Philipov, D., & Testa, M.-R. (2009). Attitudes, norms and perceived behavioral control: Explaining fertility intentions in Bulgaria. European Journal of Population, 25(4), 439–465.10.1007/s10680-009-9187-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiappori, P. A. (1988). Rational household labor supply. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 56(1), 63–89.10.2307/1911842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coombs, L. C., & Chang, M. C. (1981). Do husbands and wives agree? Fertility attitudes and later behavior. Population and Environment, 4(2), 109–127.10.1007/BF01255801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
d'Albis, H., Gobbi, P. E., & Greulich, A. (2017). Having a second child and access to childcare: Evidence from European countries. Journal of Demographic Economics, 83(2), 177–210.10.1017/dem.2017.2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doepke, M., & Kindermann, F. (2019). Bargaining over babies: Theory, evidence, and policy implications. American Economic Review, 109(9), 3264–3306.10.1257/aer.20160328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doepke, M., & Tertilt, M. (2018). Women's empowerment, the gender gap in desired fertility, and fertility outcomes in developing countries. AEA Papers and Proceedings.10.1257/pandp.20181085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eswaran, M. (2002). The empowerment of women, fertility, and child mortality: Towards a theoretical analysis. Journal of Population Economics, 15(3), 433–454.10.1007/s001480100070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ge, Y., & Zhang, X. (2019). The effect of housing price on family fertility decision in China. Population Research, 43(1), 52 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Gipson, J. D., & Hindin, M. J. (2009). The effect of husbands’ and wives’ fertility preferences on the likelihood of a subsequent pregnancy, Bangladesh 1998–2003. Population Studies, 63(2), 135–146.10.1080/00324720902859372CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hener, T. (2015). Do couples bargain over fertility? Annals of Economics and Statistics/Annales d'Économie et de Statistique, (117/118), 211–231.Google Scholar
Islam, M. M., & Bairagi, R. (2003). Fertility intentions and subsequent fertility behaviour in Matlab: Do fertility intentions matter? Journal of Biosocial Science, 35(4), 615–619.10.1017/S0021932003006072CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, H., Yi, J., & Zhang, J. (2011). Estimating the effect of the one-child policy on the sex ratio imbalance in China: Identification based on the difference-in-differences. Demography, 48(4), 1535–1557.10.1007/s13524-011-0055-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, M., & Xu, X. (2022). Fertility intentions for a second child and their influencing factors in contemporary China. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 883317.10.3389/fpsyg.2022.883317CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, J., & Liu, T. (2020). Two-child policy, gender income and fertility choice in China. International Review of Economics & Finance, 69, 1071–1081.10.1016/j.iref.2018.12.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monnier, A. (1989). Fertility intentions and actual behaviour. A longitudinal study: 1974, 1976, 1979. Population, 44(1), 237–259.Google ScholarPubMed
Patel, A., Leonard, W., Reyes-García, V., McDade, T., Huanca, T., Tanner, S., & Vadez, V. (2007). Parental preference, bargaining power, and child nutritional status: Evidence from the Bolivian Amazon. Tsimane’ Amazonian Panel Study Working Paper, 31, 1–34.Google Scholar
Qian, Y., & Jin, Y. (2018). Women's fertility autonomy in urban China: The role of couple dynamics under the universal two-child policy. Chinese Sociological Review, 50(3), 275–309.10.1080/21620555.2018.1428895CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasul, I. (2008). Household bargaining over fertility: Theory and evidence from Malaysia. Journal of Development Economics, 86(2), 215–241.10.1016/j.jdeveco.2007.02.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, C. (2017). Female relative wages, household specialization and fertility. Review of Economic Dynamics, 24, 152–174.10.1016/j.red.2017.01.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, J., Jin, Y., & Wu, L. (2019). Impact of couple's sex preference on family's second-child intentions. Population Research, 43(3), 31 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Tan, P. C., & Tey, N. P. (1994). Do fertility intentions predict subsequent behavior? Evidence from Peninsular Malaysia. Studies in Family Planning, 25(4), 222–231.10.2307/2137905CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Testa, M. R., Cavalli, L., & Rosina, A. (2014). The effect of couple disagreement about child-timing intentions: A parity-specific approach. Population and Development Review, 40(1), 31–53.10.1111/j.1728-4457.2014.00649.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, E. (1997). Couple childbearing desires, intentions, and births. Demography, 34(3), 343–354.10.2307/3038288CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomson, E., & Hoem, J. M. (1998). Couple childbearing plans and births in Sweden. Demography, 35(3), 315–322.10.2307/3004039CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomson, E., McDonald, E., & Bumpass, L. L. (1990). Fertility desires and fertility: Hers, his, and theirs. Demography, 27(4), 579–588.10.2307/2061571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tong, Y., Gan, Y., & Zhang, C. (2023). Whose preference matters more? Couple's fertility preferences and realization in the context of China's two-child policy. Journal of Family Issues, 45(2), 471–501.10.1177/0192513X221150976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, X., Wen, Q., Ma, J., & Li, J. (2020). Upward mobility and the demand for children: Evidence from China. China Economic Review, 60, 101393.10.1016/j.chieco.2019.101393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Ma et al. supplementary material

Ma et al. supplementary material
Download Ma et al. supplementary material(File)
File 20.3 KB