Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-gwv8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-04T12:22:10.079Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Genetic and phenotypic analysis of milk yield and composition in Murciano-Granadina goats

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2025

Morteza Mokhtari*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Jiroft, Jiroft, Iran
Masood Asadi Fozi
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran
Zahra Roudbari
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Jiroft, Jiroft, Iran
Arsalan Barazandeh
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Jiroft, Jiroft, Iran
Mohammad Mahdi Salari
Affiliation:
Department of Computer Science, University of Jiroft, Jiroft, Iran
Ehsan Mohebbinejad
Affiliation:
Ghale-Ganj dairy farm, Fajr Isfahan Agricultural and Livestock Company, Isfahan, Iran
Ali Esmailizadeh
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran
*
Corresponding author: Morteza Mokhtari; Email: msmokhtari@ujiroft.ac.ir

Abstract

The Murciano-Granadina goat breed was imported from Spain to the southern region of Iran to enhance production efficiency in the native and nomadic goat flocks of the region, primarily maintained under a low-input, low-output production system. In this study, the genetic and phenotypic aspects of milk production traits in the Murciano-Granadina goat breed were investigated using data collected from a private dairy farm in Ghale-Ganj city, located in southern Kerman province, Iran, between 2017 and 2024. Data on 76,874 test-day lactation records of milk yield (MY), fat yield (FY), protein yield (PY) and somatic cell count from 7,196 first-parity Murciano-Granadina does were used. The investigated traits were total MY, total FY, total PY, average fat-to-protein ratio (FPR) and average somatic cell score (SCS), all calculated based on a 275-day lactation period. A multivariate animal model was used to estimate the genetic and phenotypic parameters of the investigated traits. The heritability estimates for MY, FY, PY, FPR and SCS were 0.15, 0.06, 0.09, 0.10 and 0.26, respectively. The estimates of genetic correlations among the studied traits ranged from –0.38 for FY-FPR to 0.91 for FY-PY, while the phenotypic correlations ranged from –0.05 for MY-FPR to 0.90 for PY-FY. Genetic correlations between SCS and MY, FY and PY were low estimates of 0.16, 0.19 and 0.08, respectively. The corresponding phenotypic correlations were low estimates of 0.03 (MY-SCS), 0.05 (FY-SCS) and 0.06 (PY-SCS). Genetic and phenotypic correlation estimates among MY, FY and PY were positive and medium to high, with the corresponding genetic correlations generally higher than the phenotypic ones. These low heritability estimates for all the studied traits, except for SCS, suggest that non-additive genetic and environmental effects play a more significant role in the performance of the Murciano-Granadina goat. The high positive genetic correlation estimates between MY, FY and PY suggest that selection for higher MY should also increase in both FY and PY.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Hannah Dairy Research Foundation.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aguirre-Arroyo, E, Castaneda-Bustos, VJ, Lechuga-Arana, AA, Gutierrez-Chavez, AJ, Angel-Sahagun, CA, Hernandez-Marin, JA and Valencia-Posadas, M (2024) Genetic parameters for reproductive traits and somatic cell score in U.S. dairy goats. Tropical Animal Health and Production 56, 170.10.1007/s11250-024-04001-2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Almasri, O, Abou-Bakr, S, MAEM, Ibrahim, Kahil, O, Asaad, Z, Ghoush, M and Awad, MAA (2023) Lactation curve and milk production traits of Syrian Damascus goats. Egyptian Journal of Animal Production 60, 716.10.21608/ejap.2023.177189.1051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atoui, A, Carabano, MJ, Laroussi, A, Abdennebi, M, Salem, FB and Najari, S (2024) Assessing environmental effects upon modeling the individual lactation curve of a local goat population in a pastoral system. Animals 14, 942.10.3390/ani14060942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Louis, C, Djiane, J, Houdebine, LM and Terqui, M (1980) Relation between hormones and mammary gland function. Journal of Dairy Science 63, 14921513.10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(80)83110-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delgado, JV, Leon, JM, Gama, LT, Lozano, J, Quiroz, J and Camacho, ME (2006) Genetic parameters for milk traits in Murciano-Granadina goats in the high lands. Proceedings of the 8th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.Google Scholar
Delgado, JV, Landi, V, Barba, CJ, Fernández, J, Gomez, MM, Camacho, ME, Martínez, MA, Navas, FJ and Leon, JM (2017) Murciano-Granadina Goat: A Spanish local breed ready for the challenges of the twenty-first century, In: Simoes, J., Gutierrez, C. (Eds.), Sustainable Goat Production in Adverse Environments: Vol. II: Local Goat Breeds. Springer: Cham, Switzerland. pp. 205219.Google Scholar
Garcia-Peniche, TB, Montaldo, HH, Valencia-Posadas, M, Wiggans, GR, Hubbard, SM, Torres-Vazquez, JA and Shepard, L (2012) Breed differences over time and heritability estimates for production and reproduction traits of dairy goats in the United States. Journal of Dairy Science 95, 27072717.10.3168/jds.2011-4714CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jembere, T, Dessie, T, Rischkowsky, B, Kebede, K, Okeyo, AM and Haile, A (2017) Meta-analysis of average estimates of genetic parameters for growth, reproduction and milk production traits in goats. Small Ruminant Research 153, 7180.10.1016/j.smallrumres.2017.04.024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, CH and Peaker, M (1982) Development of the mammary gland. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 65, 521536.10.1530/jrf.0.0650521CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meyer, K (2013) WOMBAT- A Programme for Mixed Model Analyses by Restricted Maximum Likelihood. User Notes, Animal Genetics and Breeding Unit, Armidale, Australia.Google Scholar
Miranda-Alejo, JC, Leon-Jurado, JM, Pieramati, C, Gomez Carpio, MM, Jesus Valdes-Mokhtari, M, Esmailizadeh, A, Mirmahmoudi, R, Roudbari, Z, Barazandeh, A, Gutierrez, JP and Mohebbinejad, E (2024a). Genetic and phenotypic analysis of reproductive traits in the Murciano-Granadina does: Predictive ability of the statistical models and estimation of genetic parameters. Small Ruminant Research 232, 107221.Google Scholar
Mokhtari, M, Esmailizadeh, A, Roudbari, Z, Barazandeh, A, Gutierrez, JP and Mohebbinejad, E (2024b). Early growth performance in the Murciano-Granadina goats: insights from genetic and phenotypic analyses. The Journal of Agricultural Science 162, 165172.10.1017/S002185962400025XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mucha, S, Tortereau, F, Doeschl-Wilson, A, Rupp, R and Conington, J (2022) Animal Board Invited Review: Meta-analysis of genetic parameters for resilience and efficiency traits in goats and sheep. Animal 16, 100456.10.1016/j.animal.2022.100456CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peacock, C (2005) Goats - A pathway out of poverty. Small Ruminant Research 60, 179186.10.1016/j.smallrumres.2005.06.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruiz, R, Oregui, LM and Hohenboken, WD (2000) Comparison of models for describing the lactation curve of Latxa sheep and an analysis of factors affecting milk yield. Journal of Dairy Science 83, 27092719.10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(00)75165-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rout, PK, Matika, O, Kaushik, R, Dige, MS, Dass, G and Singh, SK (2017) Estimation of genetic parameters and genetic trends for milk yield traits in Jamunapari goats in semiarid tropics. Small Ruminant Research 153, 6265.10.1016/j.smallrumres.2017.05.004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rupp, R, Clement, V, Piacere, A, Robert-Granie, C and Manfredi, E (2011) Genetic parameters for milk somatic cell score and relationship with production and udder type traits in dairy Alpine and Saanen primiparous goats. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 36293634.10.3168/jds.2010-3694CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sargolzaei, M, Iwaisaki, H and Colleau, JJ (2006) CFC: A tool for monitoring genetic diversity, Proceedings of the 8th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.Google Scholar
SAS (Statistical Analysis System) (2010) SAS User’s Guide, Version 9.4. SAS Institute Inc. Cary, North Carolina, USA.Google Scholar
Schoknecht, PA, Nobrega, SN, Petterson, JA, Ehrhardt, RA, Slepetis, R and Bell, AW (1991) Relations between maternal and fetal plasma concentrations of placental lactogen and placental and fetal weights in well-fed ewes. Journal of Animal Science 69, 10591063.10.2527/1991.6931059xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scholtens, MR, Lopez‐Villalobos, N, Garrick, D, Blair, H, Lehnert, L and Snell, R (2019) Genetic parameters for total lactation yields of milk, fat, protein, and somatic cell score in New Zealand dairy goats. Animal Science Journal 91.Google ScholarPubMed
Selvaggi, M and Dario, C (2015) Genetic analysis of milk production traits in Jonica goats. Small Ruminant Research 126, 912.10.1016/j.smallrumres.2015.03.017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valencia-Posadas, M, Lechuga-Arana, AA, Avila-Ramos, F, Shepard, L, and Montaldo, HH (2022) Genetic parameters for somatic cell score, milk yield and type traits in Nigerian Dwarf goats. Animal Bioscience 35, 377384.10.5713/ab.21.0143CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zamuner, F, DiGiacomo, K, Cameron, AWN and Leury, BJ (2020) Effects of month of kidding, parity number, and litter size on milk yield of commercial dairy goats in Australia. Journal of Dairy Science 103, 954964.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed