Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-9knnw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-21T06:01:57.280Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of vacuum fluctuation during milking on the development of intramammary infection from teat duct colonization by Staphylococcus aureus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Joseph S. King ,
Frank K. Neave  and
Raymond L. Williams
Joseph S. King
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading, RG2 9 AT
Frank K. Neave
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading, RG2 9 AT
Raymond L. Williams
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading, RG2 9 AT
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Twelve of twenty-one udder quarters with colonized teat ducts became infected within 13 d when milked with a machine producing large cyclic and irregular vacuum fluctuations in the teatcup; of 23 quarters milked under the same conditions, but with metal shields fitted inside the liners to protect the teat apex (Thiel, 1974), only 2 quarters became infected in the same period. The introduction of a post-milking teat disinfectant teat dip resulted in the elimination of orifice colonization from 15 teats dipped in Na hypochlorite solution (40 g/l available chlorine) and from all but 2 of 15 teats dipped in an iodophor solution (5 g/l available iodine).

Information

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 46 , Issue 4 , November 1979 , pp. 607 - 611
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Adams, E. W., Rickard, C. G. & Murphy, J. M. (1961). Cornell Veterinarian 51, 124.Google Scholar
Bramley, A. J., King, J. S., Higgs, T. M. & Neave, F. K. (1979). British Veterinary Journal 135, 149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbes, D. (1968). Journal of Dairy Research 35, 399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbes, D. & Hebert, C. N. (1968). Veterinary Record 82, 69.Google Scholar
International Dairy Federation (1971). Annual Bulletin. Part 2, Appendix 1.Google Scholar
King, J. S., Neave, F. K. & Westgarth, D. R. (1977). Journal of Dairy Research 44, 47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, J. S. (1970). Proceedings of the International Conference on Cattle Diseases. Philadelphia, Penn., 08 1970, p. 97.Google Scholar
Milne, J. R. (1978). Proceedings of the 17th Annual Meeting National Mastitis Council Inc. p. 57.Google Scholar
Murphy, J. M. & Hansen, J. J. (1941). Cornell Veterinarian 31, 47.Google Scholar
Murphy, J. M. & Stuart, O. M. (1953). Cornell Veterinarian 43, 465.Google Scholar
Neave, F. K. & Oliver, J. (1962). Journal of Dairy Research 29, 79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neave, F. K., Oliver, J., Dodd, F. H. & Higgs, T. M. (1968). Journal of Dairy Research 35, 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newbould, F. H. S. & Neave, F. K. (1965). Journal of Dairy Research 32, 171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prasad, L. B. M. & Newbould, F. H. S. (1968). Canadian Veterinary Journal 9, 107.Google Scholar
Sharpe, M. E., Neave, F. K. & Reiter, B. (1962). Journal of Applied Bacteriology 25, 403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thiel, C. C. (1974). Biennial Reviews, National Institute for Research in Dairying, p. 35.Google Scholar
Thiel, C. C., Cousins, C. L., Westgarth, D. R. & Neave, F. K. (1973). Journal of Dairy Research 40, 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thiel, C. C., Thomas, C. L., Westgarth, D. R. & Reiter, B. (1969). Journal of Dairy Research 36, 279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar