Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-nr592 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-02T01:58:17.614Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Post-milking iodine teat skin disinfectants: 3. Residues

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Richard F. Sheldrake ,
Roderic J. T. Hoare ,
Stanley C. Chen  and
John McPhillips
Richard F. Sheldrake
Affiliation:
New South Wales Department of Agriculture, Veterinary Research Station, Glenfield, N.S.W. 2167, Australia
Roderic J. T. Hoare
Affiliation:
New South Wales Department of Agriculture, Veterinary Research Station, Glenfield, N.S.W. 2167, Australia
Stanley C. Chen
Affiliation:
Dairy Industry Authority Laboratories, University of Sydney, N.S.W. 2006, Australia
John McPhillips
Affiliation:
Dairy Industry Authority Laboratories, University of Sydney, N.S.W. 2006, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Teat dipping of lactating cows with either 1000 or 5000 mg available iodine/; (mg avI/;) solution and thoroughly washing and drying of the teats before sampling resulted in levels of 70 and 99 µg avI per quarter per milking respectively. Without any pre-milking udder preparation prior to sampling the levels of iodine recorded were 143 and 291 µg avI per quarter per milking respectively. Some systemic transfer of iodine from the teat skin to the milk was observed, but the bulk of iodine residue in milk was of direct teat skin origin.

Information

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 47 , Issue 1 , February 1980 , pp. 33 - 38
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Barrios, J. V. G. (1976). Thesis, Tierärztliche Hochschule, Hannover. (Veterinary Bulletin 47, 793.)Google Scholar
Conrad, L. M. & Hemken, R. W. (1978). Journal of Dairy Science 61, 776–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodd, F. H., Wan Embong, W. H., Kingwill, R. G., Lewis, G. & Salt, F. J. (1978). 20th International Dairy Congress, Paris E, 166.Google Scholar
Dunsmore, D. G. (1976). Australian Journal of Dairy Technology 31, 125–128.Google Scholar
Dunsmore, D. G. & Luckhurst, A. M. (1975). A Report to the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia.Google Scholar
Dunsmore, D. G., Nuzum, C. & Dettmann, B. (1977). Australian Journal of Dairy Technology 32.45–50.Google Scholar
Dunsmore, D. G. & Wheeler, S. M. (1977). Australian Journal of Dairy Technology 32, 166–171.Google Scholar
Dunsmore, D. G., Wheeler, A. M., Looue, I., Dowman, A. J. & Armfield, L. (1978). In Proceedings of a Seminar on Sanitizer Residues in Dairy Products. (Eds Wheeler, S. M. & Dunsmore., D. G.).Google Scholar
Iwarsson, K. & Ekman, L. (1974). Nordisk Veterinaer Medicin 26, 31–38.Google Scholar
Riley, M. & Gochman, N. (1964). Clinical Chemistry 10, 649.Google Scholar
Sheldrake, R. F. & Hoare, R. J. T. (1980). Journal of Dairy Research. 47, 27–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar