Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-5kfdg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-25T02:19:36.820Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Education, age at first birth, and the timing of fertility in the United States: recent trends

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

Howard Wineberg
Howard Wineberg
Affiliation:
Center for Population Research and Census, Portland State University, Oregon, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

This paper enquires whether education and age at first birth, both strongly associated with completed fertility, are related to the timing of fertility, in particular the timing of the first three births, among once married white women. Analysis of data from the June 1985 United States Current Population Survey indicates that education is related to the timing of fertility; this relationship has remained relatively constant over time. Age at first birth is associated with the timing of fertility among older but not younger women.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , April 1988 , pp. 157 - 165
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bloom, D. E. & Trussell, J. (1984) What are the determinants of delayed childbearing and permanent childlessness in the United States? Demography, 21, 591.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bumpass, L. L., Rindfuss, R. R. & Janosik, R. B. (1978) Age and marital status at first birth and the pace of subsequent fertility. Demography, 15, 75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marini, M.M. & Hodsdon, P. J. (1981) Effects of the timing of marriage and first birth on the spacing of subsequent births. Demography, 18, 529.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Center for Health Statistics (1986) Advance Report of Final Natality Statistics, 1984. Monthly Vital Statistics Report, Vol. 35, No. 4, Supplement. Public Health Service, Hyattsville, Maryland.Google Scholar
Pebley, A. R. (1981) Changing attitudes toward the timing of first births. Fam. Plann. Perspect. 13, 171.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsui, A. O. (1982) The family formation process among US marriage cohorts. Demography, 19, 1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
US Bureau of the Census (1984) Educational Attainment in the United States: March 1981 and 1980. Current Population Reports, Series P-20, No. 390. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Weller, R. H. & Hobbs, F. B. (1978) Unwanted and mistimed births in the United States: 1968–1973. Fam. Plann. Perspect. 10, 68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Westoff, C. F. (1981) The decline in unwanted fertility, 1971–1976. Fam. Plann. Perspect. 13, 70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Westoff, C. F. & Ryder, N. B. (1977) The Contraceptive Revolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Wineberg, H. & McCarthy, J. (1986) Differential fertility in the United States, 1980: continuity or change? J. biosoc. Sci. 18, 311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed