Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-rkzlw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-21T05:30:07.424Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A note of the distribution of marriage distance among the santals in the neighbourhood of Giridih, Bihar*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

Amitabha Basu
Amitabha Basu
Affiliation:
Indian Statistical Institute, RTS, Anthropometry and Human Genetics Unit, Calcutta 35, India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Marriage distance is an important variable in human genetics. The distribution of marriage distance has been studied among the Santals, a large agricultural tribe of eastern India, in the neighbourhood of Giridih, Bihar. A Type III Pearsonian curve was fitted to the observed distribution; the fit was found to be good. Possible explanations have been suggested for the distribution pattern among the Santals and for the difference with respect to this pattern between the Santals and other populations.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 5 , Issue 3 , July 1973 , pp. 367 - 376
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Alstrom, C.H. & Lindelius, R. (1966) A study of the population movement in nine Swedish subpopulations in 1800–1849 from the genetic-statistical viewpoint. Acta Genet. Statist. med. 16, 1.Google ScholarPubMed
Basu, A. (1972) A study on the mating system of the Pahira, a tribal community in eastern India. ISI Tech. Report No. Anthrop/6/72.Google Scholar
Beckman, L. (1961) Breeding patterns of a North Swedish parish. Hereditas, 47, 72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyce, A.J., Kuchemann, C.F. & Harrison, G.A. (1967) Neighbourhood knowledge and the distribution of marriage distance. Ann. hum. Genet. 30, 335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyce, A.J., Kuchemann, C.F. & Harrison, G.A. (1971) Population structure and movement patterns. In: Biological Aspects of Demography. Edited by Brass, W.. Taylor & Francis, London.Google Scholar
Buckatzsch, E.J. (1951) The constancy of local populations and migration in England and Wales before 1800. Popul. Stud. 5, 62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavalli-Sforza, L.L. (1958) Some data on the genetic structure of human populations. Proc. Xth Int. Congr. Genet. 1, 389.Google Scholar
Cavalli-Sforza, L.L. (1962) The distribution of migration distances: models, and applications to genetics. In: Les Déplacements Humains. Edited by Sutter, J.. Entret. Monaco Sc. Hum. I, p. 139.Google Scholar
Chambers, J.D. (1957) The course of population change from the Vale of Trent 1670–1800. A regional study of economic change. Econ. Hist. Rev., Suppl. 3.Google Scholar
Culshaw, W.J. (1949) Tribal Heritage: A Study of the Santals. Lutterworth, London.Google Scholar
Dobson, T. & Roberts, D.F. (1971) Historical population movement and gene flow in Northumberland parishes. J. biosoc. Sci. 3, 193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elderton, W.P. (1953) Frequency Curves and Correlations. Cambridge University Press, London.Google Scholar
Eversley, D.E.C. (1957) A survey of population in an area of Worcestershire from 1600–1850 on the basis of parish registers. Popul. Stud. 10, 253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraccaro, M. (1959) Breeding structure of populations: an analysis of distance. Eugen. Q. 6, 32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, G.A. & Boyce, A.J. (1970) Migration, exchange and population structure. Paper prepared in advance for participants in Burg WartensteinSymposium No. 50,August 1970,Burg Wartenstein.Google Scholar
Kuchemann, C.F., Boyce, A.J. & Harrison, G.A. (1967) A demographic and genetic study of a group of Oxfordshire villages. Hum. Biol. 39, 251.Google Scholar
Morrill, R.L. (1962) The development of models of migration and the role of electronic processing machines. In: Les Déplacements Humains. Edited by Sutter, J.. Entret. Monaco Sc. Hum. I, p. 213.Google Scholar
Perry, P.J. (1969) Working class isolation and mobility in rural Dorset, 1837–1936: a study of marriage distances. Trans. Inst. Br. Geogr. 46, 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sogner, S. (1963) Aspects of the demographic situation in 17 parishes in Shropshire, 1711–1760. Popul. Stud. 17, 126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spuhler, J.N. (1961) Migration into the human breeding population of Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1900–1950. Hum. Biol. 33, 223.Google Scholar
Sutter, J. & Tran-Ngoc-Toan, (1957) The problem of the structure of isolates and of their evolution among human populations. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. quant. Biol. 22, 379.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tindale, N.B. (1953) Tribal and intertribal marriage among the Australian aboriginies. Hum. Biol. 25, 169.Google Scholar