Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-b5cpw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-06T12:16:45.980Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluating Willingness to Pay as a Measure of the Impact of Dyslexia in Adults

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2017

Daniel Herrera-Araujo ,
Bennett A. Shaywitz ,
John M. Holahan ,
Karen E. Marchione ,
Reissa Michaels ,
Sally E. Shaywitz  and
James K. Hammitt
Daniel Herrera-Araujo
Affiliation:
Paris School of Economics, Hospinnomics, 75004 Paris, France
Bennett A. Shaywitz
Affiliation:
Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
John M. Holahan
Affiliation:
Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
Karen E. Marchione
Affiliation:
Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
Reissa Michaels
Affiliation:
Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
Sally E. Shaywitz
Affiliation:
Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
James K. Hammitt*
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115, USA Toulouse School of Economics, Université de Toulouse, 31000 France, e-mail: jkh@harvard.edu
*
*e-mail: jkh@harvard.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

While much is known about dyslexia in school-age children and adolescents, less is known about its effects on quality of life in adults. Using data from the Connecticut Longitudinal Study, we provide the first estimates of the monetary value of improving reading, speaking, and cognitive skills to dyslexic and nondyslexic adults. Using a stated-preference survey, we find that dyslexic and nondyslexic individuals value improvements in their skills in reading speed, reading aloud, pronunciation, memory, and information retrieval at about the same rate. Because dyslexics have lower self-reported levels on these skills, their total willingness to pay to achieve a high level of skill is substantially greater than for nondyslexics. However, dyslexic individuals’ willingness to pay (averaging $3000 for an improvement in all skills simultaneously) is small compared with the difference in earnings between dyslexic and nondyslexic adults. We estimate that dyslexic individuals earn 15% less per year (about $8000) than nondyslexic individuals. Although improvements in reading, speaking, and cognitive skills in adulthood are unlikely to eliminate the earnings difference that reflects differences in educational attainment and other factors, stated-preference estimates of the value of cognitive skills may substantially underestimate the value derived from effects on lifetime earnings and health.

Keywords

D03D12L13L22L81contingent valuationdyslexiareadingwillingness to pay

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , Spring 2017 , pp. 24 - 48
Copyright
© Society for Benefit-Cost Analysis 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Baker, David W., Parker, Ruth M., Williams, Mark V., Clark, W. Scott & Nurss, Joanne (1997). The Relationship of Patient Reading Ability to Self-Reported Health and use of Health Services. American Journal of Public Health, 87(6), 1027–1030.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blackorby, Jose & Wagner, Mary (1996). Longitudinal Postschool Outcomes of Youth with Disabilities: Findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study. Exceptional Children, 62(5), 399–413.Google Scholar
Brandt, Sylvia, Felipe, Vásquez L. & Hanemann, Michael W. (2012). Contingent Valuation Scenarios for Chronic Illnesses: The Case of Childhood Asthma. Value in Health, 15(8), 1077–1083.Google Scholar
Bynner, John & Parsons, Samantha (2009). Insights into Basic Skills from a UK Longitudinal Study. In Reder, Stephen & Bynner, John (Eds.), Tracking Adult Literacy and Numeracy Skills: Findings from Longitudinal Research (pp. 27–58). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cameron, Trudy A. & Quiggin, John (1994). Estimation Using Contingent Valuation Data from a ‘Dichotomous Choice with Follow-Up’ Questionnaire. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 27(3), 218–234.Google Scholar
Carson, Richard T. & Hanemann, Michael W. (2005). Contingent Valuation. In Mäler, Karl-Göran & Vincent, Jeffrey R. (Eds.), Handbook of Environmental Economics (pp. 821–936). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Elbro, Castren, Moller, Susan & Nielsen, Elizabeth M. (1995). Functional Reading Difficulties in Denmark. A Study of Adult Reading of Common Texts. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 7(3), 257–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrer, Emilio, McArdle, John J., Shaywitz, Bennett, Holahan, John, Marchione, Karen & Shaywitz, Sally (2007). Longitudinal Models of Developmental Dynamics between Reading and Cognition from Childhood to Adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 43(6), 1460–1473.Google Scholar
Ferrer, Emilio, Shaywitz, Bennett, Holahan, John, Marchone, Karen, Michaels, Reissa & Shaywitz, Sally (2015). Achievement Gap in Reading is Present as Early as First Grade and Persists through Adolescence. Journal of Pediatrics, 167(5), 1121–1125.Google Scholar
Ferrer, Emilio, Shaywitz, Bennett, Holahan, John, Marchone, Karen & Shaywitz, Sally (2010). Uncoupling of Reading and IQ over Time: Empirical Evidence for a Definition of Dyslexia. Psychological Science, 21(1), 93–101.Google Scholar
Fletcher, Jack M., Shaywitz, Sally, Shankweiler, Donald, Katz, Leonard, Liberman, Isabelle Y., Stuebing, Karla & Shaywitz, Bennett (1994). Cognitive Profiles of Reading Disability: Comparisons of Discrepancy and Low Achievement Definitions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(1), 6–23.Google Scholar
Hanemann, Michael W. (1994). Valuing the Environment through Contingent Valuation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(4), 19–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanemann, Michael W., Loomis, John & Kanninen, Barbara (1991). Statistical Efficiency of Double-Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 73(4), 1255–1261.Google Scholar
Kirsch, Irwin S., Jungeblut, Ann, Jenkins, Lynn & Kolstad, Andrew (1993). Adult Literacy in America: A First Look at the Results of the National Adult Literacy Survey. Princeton, New Jersey: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
Kruidenier, John R., MacArthur, Charles A. & Wrigley, Heide S. (2010). Adult Education Literacy Instruction: A Review of the Research. Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy.Google Scholar
Kutner, Mary, Greenberg, Elizabeth, Jin, Ying, Boyle, Bridget, Hsu, Yung-chen & Dunleavy, Eric(2007). Literacy in Everyday Life: Results from the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy (NCES 2007-480). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, US Department of Education.Google Scholar
Kutner, Mary, Greenberg, Elizabeth, Jin, Ying & Paulsen, Christine(2006). The Health Literacy of America’s Adults: Results from the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy (NCES 2006-483). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, US Department of Education.Google Scholar
Marcus, Erin N. (2006). The Silent Epidemic – The Health Effects of Illiteracy. New England Journal of Medicine, 355, 339–341.Google Scholar
OECD and Statistics Canada (1995). Literacy, Economy, and Society: Results of the First International Adult Literacy Survey. Paris and Ottawa: OECD Publication Service.Google Scholar
Payne, John W., Schkade, David A., Desvousges, William H. & Aultman, Chris (2000). Valuation of Multiple Environmental Programs. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 21(1), 95–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reder, Stephen & Vogel, Susan A. (1997). Lifespan Employment and Economic Outcomes for Adults with Self-Reported Learning Disabilities. In Gerber, Paul J. & Brown, Dale S. (Eds.), Learning Disabilities and Employment (pp. 371–394). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed Publishers.Google Scholar
Rudd, Rima E., Anderson, Jennie Epstein, Oppenheimer, Sarah & Nath, Charlotte (2007). Health Literacy: An Update of Medical and Public Health Literature. In Comings, John, Garner, Barbara & Smith, Christine (Eds.), Review of Adult Learning and Literacy, Volume 7: Connecting Research, Policy, and Practice (pp. 175–203). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Rudd, Rima, Kirsch, Irwin S. & Yamamoto, Kentaro (2004). Literacy and Health in America: Policy Information Report, Global Affairs Division. Princeton, New Jersey: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
Rudd, Rima E., Moeykens, Barbara A. & Colton, Tayla C. (2000). Health and Literacy: A Review of the Medical and Public Health Literature. In Comings, John P., Smith, Christine & Garner, Barbara (Eds.), Annual Review of Adult Learning and Literacy. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Shane, Frederick & Loewenstein, George (1999). Hedonic Adaption. In Kahneman, Daniel, Diener, Ed & Schwarz, Norbert (Eds.), Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology. New York: Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Shaywitz, Sally, Escobar, Michael, Shaywitz, Bennett, Fletcher, Jack M. & Makuch, Robert (1992). Evidence that Dyslexia May Represent the Lower Tail of a Normal Distribution of Reading Ability. New England Journal of Medicine, 326(3), 145–150.Google Scholar
Shaywitz, Sally, Fletcher, Jack M., Holahan, John, Shneider, Abigail, Marchione, Karen, Stuebing, Karla, Francis, David, Pugg, Kenneth R. & Shaywitz, Bennett (1999). Persistence of Dyslexia: The Connecticut Longitudinal Study at Adolescence. Pediatrics, 104(6), 1351–1359.Google Scholar
Shaywitz, Sally, Fletcher, Jack & Shaywitz, Bennett (1994). Issues in the Definition and Classification of Attention Disorder. Topics in Language Disability, 14, 1–25.Google Scholar
Shaywitz, Sally, Shaywitz, Bennett, Fletcher, Jack M. & Escobar, Michael (1990). Prevalence of Reading Disability in Boys and Girls: Results of the Connecticut Longitudinal Study. JAMA, 264(8), 998–1002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sloan, Frank A., Viscusi, W. Kip, Chesson, Harrell W., Conover, Christopher J. & Whetten-Goldstein, Kathryn (1998). Alternative Approaches to Valuing Intangible Health Losses: The Evidence for Multiple Sclerosis. Journal of Health Economics, 17(4), 475–497.Google Scholar
Sum, Andrew (1999). Literacy in the Labor Force. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.Google Scholar
Sum, Andrew, Kirsch, Irwin S. & Yamamoto, Kentaro (2004). A Human Capital Concern: The Literacy Proficiency of U.S. Immigrants. Princeton, New Jersey: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
Tamassia, Claudia, Lennon, Marylou, Yamamoto, Kentaro & Kirsch, Irwin (2007). Adult Literacy in America: A First Look at Results from the Adult Education Program and Learner Surveys. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
Train, Kenneth E. (2009). Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Von Stackelberg, Katherine & Hammitt, James K. (2009). Use of Contingent Valuation to Elicit Willingness-to-Pay for the Benefits of Developmental Health Risk Reductions. Environmental and Resource Economics, 43(1), 45–61.Google Scholar
Wechsler, David (1974). Wisc-R: Weschler Intelligence Scale for Children, Revised. New York: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Wechsler, David (1981). Wais-R Manual: Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised. New York: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Woodcock, Richard W. & Johnson, Mary E. (1977). The Psycho-Educational Battery. Allen TX: DLM Teaching Resources.Google Scholar
Woodcock, Richard W. & Johnson, Mary E. (1989). Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Cognitive Ability. Allen, Texas: DLM Teaching Resources.Google Scholar