Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-p5m67 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-20T11:58:05.959Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Opium in Java: A Sinister Friend

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2011

James R. Rush
Get access

Abstract

Opium smoking has long since disappeared as a social phenomenon in Java. But in the last century, and during the early decades of this one, smoking opium was a widespread custom in much of the island—the daily habit of hundreds of thousands, a routine part of social life among men in many regions, and a source of considerable profit to the Dutch colonial state. This article addresses the subject of opium in Java; it concentrates on the late-nineteenth and early-twentieth centuries, the historical period during which opium smoking was most widespread in Java and for which the most abundant documentary resources exist.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 44 , Issue 3 , May 1985 , pp. 549 - 560
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

List of References

Van Akkeren, Philippus. 1951. Een Gedrocht en toch de volmaakte mens: Suluk Gatolotjo [A Freak, yet every inch a man: Suluk Gatoloco]. The Hague: Academisch Proefschrift, Utrecht.Google Scholar
Anderson, Benedict O'Gorman, trans. 1981–1982. “Suluk Gatoloco.” Indonesia no. 32:109–50, no. 33:31–88.Google Scholar
Baud, Jean Chretien. 1853. “Proeve van eene geschiedenis van den handel en het verbruik van opium in Nederlandsche Indie” [An attempt at a history of the commerce in and the use of opium in Netherlands India]. BKI 1:79–220.Google Scholar
Boorsma, W. G. 1894. “Een Opium-surrogaat” [An opium surrogate] Teysmannia 5:564–66.Google Scholar
van Delden, A. J. W. 1875. “Beschouwingen over het denkbeeld om in Ned. Indie van Regeeringswege opium te produceeren” [Some thoughts about the proposal that the government cultivate opium in Netherlands India]. Blik op het Indisch Staatsbestuur [A Glimpse into Indies Governance], pp. 274–84.Google Scholar
Departement van Gouvernements bedrijven in Nederlandsch-Indie [Department of Government Enterprises in Netherlands India]. 1913. Opiumfabriek: Verslag over 1912 [Opium Factory; Report for 1912].Google Scholar
Suryo, Djoko. 1982. “Social and Economic Life in Rural Semarang Under Colonial Rule in the Later Nineteenth Century.” Ph.D. dissertation, Monash University.Google Scholar
Gavit, John Palmer. 1925. Opium. London: George Routledge and Sons.Google Scholar
Geddes, William Robert. 1976. Migrants of the Mountains. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Groneman, Isaac. 1899. “Cholera en Creoline” [Cholera and Creoline]. Geneeskundig Tijdschrift voor Ned-Indie [Netherlands India Medical Journal].Google Scholar
Haak, J. 1889. Opiumregie met normaal tjandoe [Opium Regie with normal candu].Google Scholar
Heeres, J. E. (and Stapel, F. W.), editors. 1907–1938. Corpus Diplomaticum Neerlando-indicum: Verzameling van politieke contracten en verdere door de Nederlanders in het Oosten gesloten; van privilegebrieven, aan hen verleend [Corpus Diplomaticum Neerlando-indicum: Collection of political contracts and other treaties concluded by the Dutch in the Orient and letters of privilege granted them]. 5 vols. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Heyne, K. 1927. De nuttige planten van Nederlandsch-lndie [The useful plants of Netherlands India]. 4 vols. Buitenzorg: Departement van Landbouw, Nijverheid en Handel (Department of Agriculture, Industry, and Trade).Google Scholar
Jaffe, Jerome H., and Martin, William R.. 1980. “Opioid Analgesics and Antagonists.” In Gilman, Alfred Goodman, Goodman, Louis S., and Gilman, Alfred, eds., The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics, pp. 494–534. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
de Jonge, J. K. J., editor. 1873. De Opkomst van het Nederlandsch Gezag over Java; Verzameling van onuitgegeven stukken uit der oud koloniaal Archief [The rise of Dutch authority in Java; a collection of unpublished pieces from the old colonial archives]. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Kartini, Raden Adjeng. 1976. Letters of a Javanese Princess. Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kramer, John C. 1979. “Speculations on the Nature and Pattern of Opium Smoking.” Journal of Drug Issues. Spring vol.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Het loon van de koffieplantende bevolking op Java in verband met art. 56 van het Regeerings-reglement” [Wages of the coffee-planting population of Java in connection with article 56 of the Fundamental Law]. 1888. Indische Gids [Indies Digest] 2:1818–33.Google Scholar
van Otterloo, Antonie de Mol. 1933. De Opiumschuiver in het Hospitaal [The Opium Smoker in the Hospital]. Utrecht: Kemink.Google Scholar
Rush, James R. 1977. “Opium Farms in Nineteenth-Century Java: Institutional Continuity and Change in a Colonial Society, 1860–1910.” Ph.D. dissertation, Yale University.Google Scholar
Steiner, William Glenn. 1974. “Drug Problems.” Encyclopedia Britannica 5:1048–60.Google Scholar
Steinmetz, H. E. 1888. Indische Brieven aan een Staatsraad [Indies Letters to a Member of Parliament]. Haarlem: De Erven F. Bohn.Google Scholar
Sutherland, Heather. 1979. The Making of a Bureaucratic Elite. Singapore: Asian Studies Association of Australia, Southeast Asia Publication Series.Google Scholar
Verslag betreffende de Opium- en Zoutregie en de Zoutwinning over het jaar 1935 [Report concerning the Opium and Salt Regie and Saltmaking in 1935]. Batavia: Opium-en Zoutregie. (Opium and Salt Regie).Google Scholar
Winter, Carel Frederick. 1840. “Verbod tegen het gebruik van amfioen, Soera-karta 1840. Oorzaak van dit verbod door Pakie Boewon II” [Ban on the use of opium, Surakarta 1840. Origin of this ban by Paku Buwana II]. Tijdschrift van Nederlandsch-lndie [Netherlands India Journal] 2:588.Google Scholar