Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-hn9fh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-22T07:42:24.541Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some effects of rate of application of nitrogenous fertilizer to wheat grown continuously compared with wheat in a four-course rotation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

W. J. Ridgman ,
D. E. Walters ,
R. B. Wedgwood  and
U. Müller-Wilmes
W. J. Ridgman
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Biology, University of Cambridge
D. E. Walters
Affiliation:
Agricultural and Food Research Council Statistics Group, Pembroke Street, Cambridge, CB2 3DX
R. B. Wedgwood
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Biology, University of Cambridge
U. Müller-Wilmes
Affiliation:
Institut für Pflanzenbau und Pflanzenzuchtung der Universität Giessen, Ludwigstrasse 23, D-6300 Giessen, West Germany
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

An experiment comparing continuous winter wheat with the two wheat crops in a rotation of beans, oats, wheat, wheat, with four rates of application of N fertilizer, is described and the results discussed.

The wheat following wheat in the rotation consistently outyielded the wheat following oats, but the continuous wheat yielded on average less. Response to N fertilizer was not affected by sequence of cropping and since there was practically no response to the highest increment of N, it is clear that additional N could not have brought the yield of the continuous wheat up to the level of the wheat in rotation.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 105 , Issue 2 , October 1985 , pp. 389 - 396
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Gilligan, C. A. (1982). Size and shape of sampling units for estimating incidence of sharp eyespot, Rhizoctonia cerealis, in plots of wheat. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 99, 461–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanley, F. & Ridgman, W. J. (1978). Some effects of growing winter wheat continuously. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 90, 517–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holbrook, J. R., Osborne, J. D. & Ridgman, W. J. (1982). An attempt to improve the yield and quality of direct-drilled winter wheat grown continuously. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 99, 163–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller-Wilmes, U. (1982). Zur Ertragsbildung bei Winterweizen (Triticum aestivum L.) im Daüeranbau. Landwirtschaftliche forschung 35, 96–108.Google Scholar
Müller-Wilmes, U. & Zoschke, M. (1980). Allelopathie – eine mögliche Ursaohe für Verträglichkeitsbesichüngen der Kulturpflanzen? Angewandte Botanik 54, 109–123.Google Scholar
Ridgman, W. J. & Walters, D. E. (1982). A comparison of growing wheat continuously with growing wheat in a four-course rotation. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 99, 139–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widdowson, F. V., Johnston, A. E. & Penny, , (1980). Multifactorial experimentation on continuous winter wheat grown in sandy clay soil at Saxmundham, Suffolk. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 94, 155–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar