Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-9knnw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-02T14:08:38.418Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Prospects for the development of F1 hybrid varieties of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) and other herbage grasses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

C. A. Foster
C. A. Foster
Affiliation:
Plant Breeding Division, Ministry of Agriculture for Northern Ireland, Loughgall, Co. Armagh, Northern Ireland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Consideration is given to the prospects of producing F1 hybrid varieties of perennial ryegrass, Lolium perenne, and other herbage grass species for commercial use. In the light of the results of interpopulational hydridization in this and other crop species and of the technical and economic disadvantages inherent in other methods of F1 hybrid seed production, it is concluded that the development of interpopulational F1 hybrid varieties, by the field interpollination of parent populations, is a desirable and worthwhile breeding objective.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 81 , Issue 1 , August 1973 , pp. 33 - 37
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Binqham, J. (1966). Paternal effect on grain size in wheat. Nature, Lond. 209, 940.Google Scholar
Bumton, G. W. (1948). The performance of various mixtures of hybrid and parent inbred pearl millet, Pennisetum glaucum. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 40, 908.Google Scholar
Burton, G. W. (1952). The immediate effect of gametic relationship upon seed production in pearl millet Pennisetum glaucum. Agron. J. 44, 424.Google Scholar
Burton, G. W. (1956). Utilization of heterosis in pasture plant breeding. Proc. VII int. Qrassld Congr. p. 439.Google Scholar
Burton, G. W. & Sprague, G. F. (1961). Use of hybrid vigour in plant improvement. In Qerm Plasm Resources (ed. Hodgson, R. E.), p. 191. Publs Am. Ass. Advmnt Sci. no. 66.Google Scholar
Carnahan, H. L. & Peaden, R. N. (1967). Effect of vigour of Sj lines and seeding rates on yield and final stand of an alfalfa two-clone combination admixed with different percentages of S1 seed. Crop Sci. 7, 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charles, A. H. (1961). Differential survival of cultivars of Lolium, Dactylis and Phleum. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 16, 69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charles, A. H. (1964). Differential survival of plant types in swards. J. Br. &rassld Soc. 19, 198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comstock, R. E., Robinson, H. F. & Harvey, P. H. (1949). A breeding procedure designed to make maximum use of both general and specific combining ability. Agron. J. 41, 360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, C. A. (1968). A study of intervarietal heterosis in Lolium perenne. Ph.D. Thesis, Queen's University, Belfast.Google Scholar
Foster, C. A. (1969). Efficacy of selective gametocides on Lolium perenne. Ann. Bot. 33, 947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, C. A. (1971 a). Interpopulational and intervarietal hybridization in Lolium perenne breeding: heterosis under non-competitive conditions. J. agric. Sci., Cainb. 76, 107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, C. A. (1971 b). A study of the theoretical expectation of F1 hybridity resulting from bulk interpopulation hybridization in herbage grasses. J. agric. Sci., Oamb. 76, 295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, C. A. (1971 c). Interpopulational and intervarietal F1 hybrids in Lolium perenne: heterosis under simulated-sward conditions. J. agric. Sci., Oamb. 76, 401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, C. A. (1973). Interpopulational and intervarietal F1 hybrids in Lolium perenne: performance in field sward conditions. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 80, 463–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, C. H., Graumann, H. O., Kerr, W. R., Carnhan, H. L., Davies, R. L., Dudley, J. W., Elling, L. J., Lowe, C. C., Smith, D., Sorensen, E. L. & Wilsie, C. P. (1964). Relative performance of alfalfa varieties, variety crosses and variety mixtures. A.R.S., U.S. Dept. Agric. Prod. Res. Rep. no. 83.Google Scholar
Jenkin, T. J. (1931). Self-fertility in perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.). Bull. Welsh PI. Breed. Stn, ser. H 12, 100.Google Scholar
Knowles, R. P. (1970). Performance of synthetics and sib lines in Fairway Crested Wheatgrass, Agropyron cristatum. Crop. Sci. 10, 642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lonnquist, J. H. & Gardner, C. O. (1961). Heterosis in intervarietal crosses in maize and its implications in breeding procedures. Crop Sci. 1, 179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moll, R. H. & Stuber, C. W. (1971). Comparisons of response to alternative selection procedures initiated with two populations of maize (Zea mays L.). Crop Sci. 11, 706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moll, R. H., Salhuana, W. S. & Robinson, H. F. (1962). Heterosis and genetic diversity in variety crosses of maize. Crop Sci. 2, 197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moll, R. H., Lonnquist, J. H., Fortuno, J. V. & Johnson, E. C. (1965). The relationship of heterosis and genetic divergence in maize. Genetics, 52, 139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Niqueux, M. & Arnaud, R. (1972). In Rapport d'Activaté 1968–1971. Station d'Amélioration des Plantes de Clermont-Ferrand, France. (Section J, Amélioration de la Fétuque élevée).Google Scholar
Paterniani, E. & Lonnquist, J. H. (1963). Heterosis in inter-racial crosses of corn. Crop Sci. 3, 504.Google Scholar
Penny, L. H. & Eberhart, S. A. (1971). Twenty years of reciprocal recurrent selection with two synthetic varieties of maize (Zea mays L.). Crop Sci. 11, 900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfahler, P. L. (1966 a). Heterosis and homeostasis in rye (Secale cereale). I. Individual plant production of varieties and intervarietal crosses. Crop Sci. 6, 397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfahler, P. L. (1966 b). Heterosis and homeostasis in rye (Secale cereale). II. Production of varieties, intervarietal crosses and composite populations under various plant densities. Crop Sci. 6, 401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollack, E., Robinson, H. F. & Comstock, R. E. (1957). Interpopulation hybrids in open-pollinated varieties of maize. Am. Nat. 91, 387.Google Scholar
Richey, F. D. (1922). The experimental basis for the present status of corn breeding. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 14, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, H. F., Comstock, R. E., Khalil, A. & Harvey, P. H. (1956). Dominance versus overdominance in heterosis: evidence from crosses between open-pollinated varieties of maize. Am. Nat. 90, 127.Google Scholar
Tysdal, H. M. & Kiesselbach, T. A. (1944). Hybrid alfalfa. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 36, 649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, C. E. (1966). Some implications of genotypeherbicide interactions in the breeding of Lolium perenne. Euphytica 15, 229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, C. E. (1968). A preliminary examination of the differential reaction of perennial and Italian ryegrass cultivars to grass-killing herbicides. Proc. 9th Br. Weed. Control Conf. p. 477.Google Scholar