Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-plnhv Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2025-08-23T10:38:24.437Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Indices of the carcass composition of Dorset Horn top-cross lambs. III. Relationships between chemical composition, specific gravity and weight of carcasses and joints

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

S. L. Pradhan ,
W. R. McManus ,
C. L. Goldstone ,
R. F. Hart ,
V. N. Khandekar  and
G. W. Arnold
S. L. Pradhan
Affiliation:
School of Wool Technology, University of New South Wales, Kensington, Australia
W. R. McManus
Affiliation:
School of Wool Technology, University of New South Wales, Kensington, Australia
C. L. Goldstone
Affiliation:
School of Wool Technology, University of New South Wales, Kensington, Australia
R. F. Hart
Affiliation:
School of Wool Technology, University of New South Wales, Kensington, Australia
V. N. Khandekar
Affiliation:
School of Wool Technology, University of New South Wales, Kensington, Australia
G. W. Arnold
Affiliation:
Grassland Agronomy Section, Division of Plant Industry, G.S.I.R.O., Canberra, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The half-carcasses from twelve Dorset Horn x Border Leicester-Merino lambs (3-5 months old) were used to investigate the relationships between the weight of the carcass and its cuts and their chemical composition. The specific gravity of the whole carcass and of the cuts was also measured.

Half-carcass weight and chemical composition were highly correlated. Weight could be used to predict the chemical composition with a reasonable degree of accuracy. The loin, the leg, the leg plus loin and the residual were shown to be highly correlated with the chemical composition of the halfcarcass. The loin and leg plus loin are the most convenient to use.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 66 , Issue 1 , February 1966 , pp. 41 - 47
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Handbook, A.O.A.C. (1955). Official Methods of Analysis, 8th ed.Association of Official Agricultural Chemistry, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Barton, K. A. & Kirton, A. H. (1956). Nature, Lond., 178, 920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barton, R. A. & Kirton, A. H. (1958a). Proc. N.Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. 18, 112.Google Scholar
Barton, R. A. & Kirton, A. H. (1958b). J. Agric. Sci. 50, 331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barton, R. A. & Kirton, A. H. (1958c). N.Z. J. Agric. Res. 1, 783–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butterfield, R. M. (1963). Conference on Carcass Composition and Appraisal in Meat Animals. Melbourne, Australia, 12–16 08.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. (1932). Growth and Development of Mutton Qualities in the Sheep. London: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Hankins, O. G. & Howe, P. E. (1946). U.S.D.A. Tech. Bull. no. 926.Google Scholar
Hopper, T. H. (1944). J. Agric. Sci. 68, 239.Google Scholar
Keys, A. & Brozek, J. (1953). Physiol. Rev. 33, 245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khandekar, V. N. (1963). M.Sc. Thesis, University of New South Wales.Google Scholar
Khandekar, V. N., Goldstone, C. L. & McManus, W. R. (1965). J. Agric. Sci. 65, 147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirton, A. H. & Barton, R. A. (1958). J. Agric. Sci. 51, 265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirton, A. H. & Barton, R. A. (1962). J. Anim. Sci. 58, 381.Google Scholar
Kirton, A. H., Barton, R. A. & Rae, A. L. (1962). J. Agric. Sci. 58, 381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ledger, H. P. & Hutchinson, H. G. (1962). J. Agric. Sci. 58, 81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lush, J. L. (1926). J. Agric. Res. 32, 727.Google Scholar
Pálsson, H. (1939). J. Agric. Sci. 29, 544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, T. R. & Gee, I. (1957). Nature, Lond., 129, 247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. (1956). Statistical Methods, 5th ed.Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Tullook, N. M. (1963). Nature, Lond., 197, 809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, D. E. & McMeekan, C. P. (1944). N.Z. J. Sci. Tech. (A), 26, 51.Google Scholar