Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-d5ftd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-18T14:24:34.013Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The base status of Scottish soils. I. The effects of lime on five typical soils from north-east Scotland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

R. L. Mitchell
R. L. Mitchell
Affiliation:
Macaulay Institute for Soil Research, Aberdeen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The effects of lime on five soils representative of types from northeast Scotland have been studied and different lime requirement methods compared.

Laboratory analyses including mechanical and ultimate chemical analyses, pH, exchangeable cation and lime-requirement determinations were carried out on samples taken before and at two intervals of 6 months after the application of lime.

In some cases the maximum effect of the lime applied occurs within 6 months, in others neutralization is continued during the second 6 months.

The change in pH value varies, according to the soil type, from 0·5 to 1·0 pH units per ton of calcium oxide applied per acre.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 26 , Issue 4 , October 1936 , pp. 664 - 678
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1936

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

(1)Agricultural Education Association. Agric. Progr. (1928), 5, 139.Google Scholar
(2)Hendrick, J.Trans. Highl. agric. Soc. Scot. (1930), 42, 1.Google Scholar
(3)Hissink, D. J.Soil Research, Berl. (1930), 2, 77.Google Scholar
(4)Hissink, D. J.Trans. 2nd. Comm. Int. Soc. soil Sci., Groningen (1927), A, 174.Google Scholar
(5)Hutchinson, H. B. & MacLennan, K.J. agric. Sci. (1915), 7, 75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(6)Kappen, H.Trans. 2nd Comm. Int. Soc. Soil Sci., Groningen (1927), B, 179.Google Scholar
(7)Ogg, W. G.Emp. J. exp. Agric. (1935), 3, 257–9.Google Scholar
(8)Parker, F. W.J. Amer. Soc. Agron. (1929), 21, 1030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(9)Pierre, W. H. & Scarseth, G. D.Soil Sci. (1931), 31, 99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(10)Smith, A. M.J. agric. Sci. (1925), 15, 466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(11)Smith, A. M. & Coull, R.Soil Research, Berl. (1932), 3, 10.Google Scholar
(12)Walker, R. H., Brown, P. E. & Young, A. W.Res. Bull. la agric. Exp. Sta. (1932), No. 148.Google Scholar
(13)Wiegner, G.Trans. 3rd Int. Congr. Soil Sci., Oxford (1936), 3, 5.Google Scholar