Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-rkzlw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-01T08:58:48.471Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Relative Importance of Factors Affecting Customer's Decisions to Buy Pick-Your-Own Versus Preharvested Fruit at North Carolina Farms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2015

Carlos E. Carpio ,
Michael K. Wohlgenant  and
Charles D. Safley
Carlos E. Carpio
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Economics and Statistics, Clemson University, Clemson, SC
Michael K. Wohlgenant
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
Charles D. Safley
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study identifies the most important factors affecting customers’ decisions to buy pick-your-own versus prepicked strawberries and muscadine grapes at direct-market operations in North Carolina. The relative importance analysis identified the region of location of the operations and prices as the explanatory variable explaining most of the variation observed in the customer's decision to choose the type of fruit to purchase. The estimated price elasticities indicate that sales of each type of fruit are very sensitive to prices.

Keywords

conditional and random parameters logit modelsdemand analysispick-your-own fruitrelative importanceD12Q13

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 40 , Issue 3 , December 2008 , pp. 983 - 997
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Azen, R., and Budescu, D.V. “The Dominance Analysis Approach for Comparing Predictors in Multiple Regression.” Psychological Methods 8(2003): 129–148.Google Scholar
Bhat, C.R. “Imputing a Continuous Income Variable from Grouped and Missing Income Observations.” Economics Letters 46(1994): 311–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, A. “Farmer's Market Research 1940-2000: An Inventory and Review.” American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 17(2002): 167–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Courter, J.W., and Kitson, M. “1987 Survey of Pick-Your-Own Strawberry Customers.” Advances in Strawberry Production: North American Strawberry Growers Association 7(1988): 39–41.Google Scholar
Govindasamy, R., Italia., J., and Adelaja, A. “Farmers' Markets: Consumer Trends, Preferences, and Characteristics.” Journal of Extension (online) 40,1(2002).Google Scholar
Govindasamy, R., and Nayga, R.M. Jr. “Determinants of Farmer-to-Consumer Direct Market Visits by Type of Facility: A Logit Analysis.” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review (April 1997):31–38.Google Scholar
Greene, W.H. Econometric Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, 2003.Google Scholar
Grömping, U. “Relative Importance for Linear Regression in R: The Package relaimpo.” Journal of Statistical Software 17,1(2006).Google Scholar
Grömping, U. “Estimators of Relative Importance in Linear Regression Based on Variance Decomposition.” American Statistician 61,2(2007): 1–9.Google Scholar
Hanemann, W.M. “Discrete/Continuous Models of Consumer Demand.” Econometrica 52(1984): 541–562.Google Scholar
Heinze, G., and Schemper, M. “Comparing the Importance of Prognostic Factors in Cox and Logistic Regression using SAS.” Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 71(2003): 155–163.Google Scholar
Johnson, J.W. “Factors Affecting Relative Weights: The Influence of Sampling and Measurement Error.” Organizational Research Methods 7(2004):283–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, J.W., and Lebreton, J.M. “History and Use of Relative Importance Indices in Organizational Research.” Organizational Research Methods 7(2004):238–257.Google Scholar
Kruskal, W., and Majors, R. “Concepts of Relative Importance in Recent Scientific Literature.” The American Statistician 43(1989):2–6.Google Scholar
Leones, J., Dunn., D., Worden., M., and Call, R. Direct Farm Marketing and Tourism Handbook. Tucson, AZ: Agricultural and Resource Economics Department, University of Arizona, 1995. Internet site: http://ag.arizona.edu/arec/pubs/dmkt/dmkt.html (Accessed March 14, 2005).Google Scholar
Leong, S. “Marketing.” Muscadine Grapes, Basiouny, F.M. and Himelrick, D.G. eds. Alexandria, VA: ASHS Crop Production Series, 2001.Google Scholar
Manalo, A.B., Sciabarrasi, M.R., Haddad, N.A., and McWilliam-Jellie, G. Buying Products Directly From Farmers and Valuing Agriculture: Behavior and Attitudes of New Hampshire Food Shoppers. Durham, NH: University of New Hampshire Cooperative Extension, 2003. Internet site: http://extension.unh.edu/pubs/AgPubs/FCSR703.pdf (Accessed September 18 2006).Google Scholar
McFadden, D. “The Measurement of Urban Travel Demand.” Journal of Public Economics 3(1974): 303–328.Google Scholar
Menard, S. “Coefficients of Determination for Multiple Logistic Regression Analysis.” The American Statistician 54(2000): 17–24.Google Scholar
Ott, S.L., Hubbard, E.E., and Maligaya, A. Pick-Your-Own Blueberries: A Case Study of Consumer Characteristics and Attitudes. Athens, GA: The Georgia Agricultural Experiment Stations, College of Agriculture, The University of Georgia, Research Report 560, December 1988.Google Scholar
Pulsue, N.H. Jr. Consumers at Vermont Apple Pick-Your-Own and Roadside Stands. Burlington, VT: Vermont Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Vermont, Research Report 35, 1983.Google Scholar
Pulsue, N.H. Jr. Consumers at Pick-Your-Own Strawberry Markets in Vermont. Burlington, VT: Vermont Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Vermont, Research Report 39, 1984.Google Scholar
Safley, C.D., Wohlgenant, M.K., Carpio, C.E., Williams., R., and Dautlick, T. Factors Affecting Consumer Purchases of Direct Market Muscadine Grapes: 2001. Raleigh, NC: Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, North Carolina State University, ARE Report No. 30, 2001.Google Scholar
Safley, C.D., Wohlgenant, M.K., and Suter, R.E. Factors Affecting Consumer Purchases of Direct Market Strawberries: 1999. Raleigh, NC: Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, North Carolina State University, ARE Report No. 22, 1999.Google Scholar
Soofi, E.S. “A Generalizable Formulation of Conditional Logit with Diagnostics.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 87(1992): 812–816.Google Scholar
Soofi, E.S., Retzer, J.J., and Yasai-Ardekani, M. “A Framework for Measuring the Importance of Variables with Applications to Management Research and Decision Models.” Decision Sciences 31(2000):595–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, M.B. “On Least Square Estimation when the Dependent Variable is Grouped.” Review of Economic Studies 50(October 1983):737–753.Google Scholar
Toensmeyer, U.C., and Ladzinski, K. Consumer Attitudes Concerning Marketing of Fresh Fruits and Vegetables through Direct Markets, Delaware. Newark, DE: Department of Agricultural and Food Economics, University of Delaware, Bulletin 443, 1983.Google Scholar
Train, K.E. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2002 Census of Agriculture. Table 2: Market Value of Agricultural Products Sold Including Landlord's Share, Direct, and Organic: 2002 and 1997.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. Fruit and Tree Nuts Outlook, July 28, 2005. Internet site: http://www.ers.usda.gov/Briefing/FruitAndTreeNuts/fruitnutpdf/Strawberries.pdf (Accessed September 18, 2007).Google Scholar