Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-hqlzj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-02T14:34:26.360Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Productivity-Concentration Relationship in The U.S. Meatpacking Industry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2016

Clement E. Ward
Clement E. Ward*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Oklahoma State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Previous research found a positive relationship between concentration and total factor productivity in food manufacturing. One industry (i.e., meatpacking plants [SIC 2011]) was selected for independent analysis due to a relatively sharp increase in concentration in recent years. The methodology chosen was similar to previous studies. Total factor productivity increased 2.4 percent per year, and labor productivity increased 3.3 percent per year for meatpacking plants over the 1958–82 period. Concentration in meatpacking did not positively or negatively affect total factor productivity or labor productivity over the 25-year study period.

Keywords

meatpackingproductivityconcentrationindustry structureeconomic performance

Information

Type
Notes
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , December 1987 , pp. 217 - 222
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aspelin, A., and Engelman, G.. Packer Feeding of Cattle—Its Volume and Significance. C&MS-USDA, MRR 776, 1966.Google Scholar
Ball, V. E., and Chambers, R. G.. “An Economic Analysis of Technology in the Meat Products Industry.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 64(1982):699–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cothern, J. H., Peard, M., and Weeks, J. L.. Economies of Scale in Beef Processing and Portion Control Operations: Northern California, 1976. Univ. of Cal. Leaflet 21027, 1978a.Google Scholar
Cothern, J. H., Peard, M., and Weeks, J. L.. Economies of Scale in Beef Slaughtering: Northern California, 1976. Univ. of Cal. Leaflet 21040, 1978b.Google Scholar
Gisser, M. “Welfare Implications of Oligopoly in U.S. Food Manufacturing.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 64(1982):616–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gisser, M. “Price Leadership and Dynamic Aspects of Oligopoly in U.S. Manufacturing.” J. Pol. Econ., 92(1984):1035–1048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayenga, M. L., Dieter, R. E., and Montoya, C.. “Price Impacts Associated with the Closing of Hog Slaughtering Plants.” No. Cent. J. Agr. Econ., 8(1986):237–242.Google Scholar
Hazledine, T., and Cahill, S.. “Welfare Implications of Oligopoly in U.S. Food Manufacturing: Comment.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 68(1986):165–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendrick, J. W. Interindustry Differences in Productivity Growth. Washington D.C. American Enterprise Institute, 1983.Google Scholar
Kendrick, J. W., and Grossman, E. S.. Productivity in the United States: Trends and Cycles. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Logan, S. H., and King, G. A.. Economies of Scale in Beef Slaughter Plants. Cal. Agri. Expt. Station, Giannini Found. Res. Rept. 260, 1962.Google Scholar
Love, H. G., and Shuffett, D. M.. “Short-Run Price Effects of a Structural Change in a Terminal Market for Hogs.” J. Farm Econ., 47(1965):803–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lustgarten, S. “Gains and Losses from Concentration: Comment.” J. Law and Econ., 22(1979):183–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfield, E. Microeconomics Theory and Applications. 2nd ed. New York; W. W. Norton & Co., 1975.Google Scholar
Menkhaus, D. J., Clair, J. S. St., and Ahmaddaud, Z.. “The Effects of Industry Structure on Price: A Case in the Beef Industry.” West. J. Agr. Econ., 6, 2(1981):147–153.Google Scholar
Multop, J. R., and Helmuth, J. W.. Relationship Between Structure and Performance in the Steer and Heifer Slaughtering Industry. U.S. House Committee on Small Business, Staff Report, September 1980.Google Scholar
Peltzman, S. “The Gains and Losses from Industrial Concentration.” J. Law and Econ., 20 (1977):229–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sersland, C. J. “Cost Analysis of the Steer and Heifer Processing Industry and Implications on Long-Run Industry Structure.” Unpublished dissertation, Oklahoma State University. 1985.Google Scholar
Solow, R. M. “Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function.” Rev. Econ. and Stat, 39(1957):312–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Prices: Annual Summary. Crop Reporting Board, Economics and Statistics Service, various years.Google Scholar
United States Department of Commerce. Census of Manufactures, Industry Series for Meat Products. Washington D.C., 1967, 1972, 1977, and 1982 (preliminary).Google Scholar
Ward, C. E. “Short-Period Pricing Models for Fed Cattle and Impacts of Wholesale Carcass Beef and Live Cattle Futures Market Prices.” So. J. Agr. Econ., 13(1981):125–132.Google Scholar
Ward, C. E. “Relationship Between Fed Cattle Market Shares and Prices Paid by Beefpackers in Localized Markets.” West. J. Agr. Econ., 7(1982):79–86.Google Scholar
Ward, C. E. “An Empirical Study of Price Discovery and Competition for Slaughter Lambs.” West J. Agr. Econ., 9(1984):135–144.Google Scholar