Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-plnhv Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2025-08-23T19:50:13.373Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Phosphorus-Based Applications of Livestock Manure and the Law ofUnintended Consequences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2005

F. Bailey Norwood  and
Jan Chvosta
F. Bailey Norwood
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK
Jan Chvosta
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The application of manure phosphorus at rates above crop uptake has resultedin water pollution for some regions. In response, new manure managementstandards will require some farms to match manure phosphorus applicationrates with crop uptake. For some regions, this will lead to more crop acresand a shift toward crops with greater nutrient uptake, both of which willincrease nitrogen runoff. The greater nitrogen runoff could offset the lowerphosphorus runoff to result in greater water pollution. This demonstratesthe law of unintended consequences, which results when policy does notconsider how economic agents respond to incentives.

Keywords

best management practiceeutrophicationmanure managementnutrient runoffphosphorus standardspollution controlwater pollutionD6Q1Q2

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 37 , Issue 1 , April 2005 , pp. 79 - 90
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Barker, J.C. “Lagoon Design and Management For Livestock Waste Treatment and Storage.” North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service, Publication EBAE 103-83, March, 1996.Google Scholar
Bicudo, J.R., Safley, L.M. Jr., and Westerman, P.W.. “Nutrient Content and Sludge Volumes in Single-Cell Recycle Anaerobic Lagoons in North Carolina.” American Society of Agricultural Engineers 42,4(1999): 1087–93.10.13031/2013.13256Google Scholar
Carter-Young, H., Cates, S., Chvosta, J., Ji, Y., Wossink, A., and Zering, K.. “Evaluation of Swine Producers' Perceptions of Alternative Waste Management Systems: The Smithfield Foods-Premium Standard Farms Agreement with the North Carolina Attorney General.” Prepared for the Animal and Poultry Waste Management Center, North Carolina State University, May 2003.Google Scholar
Chastain, J.P., Camberato, J.J., Albrecht, J.E., and Adams, J. III. “Swine Manure Production and Nutrient Content. Chapter 3. Confined Animal Manure Managers Certification Program.” Clemson University, January 1999. Conservation for America's Future. National Crop Residue Management Survey. 2000. Internet site: http://www.ctic.purdue.edu/CTIC/CTIC.html (Accessed July 2002).Google Scholar
Department of Water Quality. “Online Database of North Carolina Hog Farms.” North Carolina Department of Natural and Environmental Resources, 2002a.Google Scholar
Department of Water Quality. “North Carolina Water Permits for Hog Facilities.” North Carolina Department of Natural and Environmental Resources, 2002b.Google Scholar
Department of Water Quality. “Water Quality in the Cape Fear River Basin.” North Carolina Department of Natural and Environmental Resources, July 2002c.Google Scholar
Department of Water Quality. Personal communication with water quality modelers. North Carolina Department of Natural and Environmental Resources, July 2002d.AMBIGUOUS (562035 citations)Google Scholar
Feinerman, E., Bosch, D.J., and Pease, J.W.. “Manure Applications and Nutrient Standards.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86,1 (February 2004): 14–25.10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00559.xGoogle Scholar
Frontline Farmers. Personal communication and results of a small email survey conducted in October 2002, Raleigh, N.C.Google Scholar
ProfessorGilliam, W., Department of Soil Science, North Carolina State University. Personal communication. October 2002.Google Scholar
Kansas State University. “Soil Test Interpretations and Fertilizer Recommendations.” Department of Agronomy, MF-2586. June 2003.Google Scholar
Kellogg, R.L., Lander, C.H., Moffitt, D.C., and Gollehon, N.. “Manure Nutrients Relative to the Capacity of Cropland and Pastureland to Assimilate Nutrients.” U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Economic Research Service publication npsOO-0597, December 2002.Google Scholar
McMahon, G., and Roessler, C.. “A Regression-Based Approach to Understand Baseline Total Nitrogen Loading For TMDL Planning.” Raleigh, NC: U.S. Geological Survey working paper, November 2002.Google Scholar
McNeil, J.R. An Environmental History of the Twentieth-Century World: Something New un der the Sun. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
National Agricultural Statistics Service. “Historical County Data Online Database.” Washington, D.C., November 9, 2002.Google Scholar
Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). Natural Resource Conservation Service Practice Standard. Waste Utilization (Acre) Code 633, July 1996.Google Scholar
Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). Nutrient Management Standards 590, 2002.Google Scholar
Norwood, F.B., and Chvosta, J.. “Are Phosphorus-Based Applications of Livestock Manure Environmentally Friendly?” Proceedings of the Second International Conference of Swine Housing. Research Triangle Park, NC. October 12-15, 2003.Google Scholar
Schwabe, A.K. “Source Heterogeneity, Resource Characteristics, and the Performance of Marketable Permits.” Ph.D. thesis. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University, 1996.Google Scholar
Schwabe, A.K. “Nonpoint Source Pollution, Uniform Control Strategies, and the Neuse River Basin.” Review of Agricultural Economics 23,2(Fall/Winter 2001):333–51.10.1111/1467-9353.00065Google Scholar
Shaffer, K. “Lesson 31: Manure Utilization Plans.” Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University, September 2000.Google Scholar
Sharpley, A.N., Weld, J.L., Beegle, d.B., Kleinman, P.J.A., Bgurek, W.J., Moore, P.A., and Mullins, G.. “Development of Phosphorus Indices for Nutrient Management Planning Strategies in the United States.” Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Service 58,3(2003): 137–52.Google Scholar
Smithfield Foods. Personal communication. July 2002.Google Scholar
University of North Carolina at Wilmington. “Environmental Assessment of the Lower Cape Fear River System: 2000-2001.” CMS Report 01-01. Wilmington, NC: Center for Marine Science, October 2001.Google Scholar
U.S. Geological Survey. “Water Quality in the Central Columbia Plateau, Washington and Idaho, 1992-95.” Glossary. Reston, VA, March 3, 1998.Google Scholar
U.S. Geological Survey. “Review of Phosphorus Control Measures in the United States and Their Effect on Water Quality.” Water-Resources Investigations Report 99-4007, Reston, VA, 1999.Google Scholar
U.S. Geological Survey. Historical Data on Stream Flows. Internet site: http://water.usgs.gov/nwc/ (Accessed November 2002).Google Scholar
Vesiland, P.A., Peirce, J.J., and Weiner, R.F.. Environmental Pollution and Control, 3rd ed. Butterworth-Heinemann, 1990.Google Scholar
Zublena. Soil Facts. Nutrient Removal by Crops in North Carolina. Internet site: http://www.soil.ncsu.edu/publications/Soilfacts/AG-439-16 (Accessed July 2002).Google Scholar