Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-r5d9c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-25T16:47:55.415Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Implications of Integrated Commodity Programs and Crop Insurance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2015

Keith H. Coble  and
Barry J. Barnett
Keith H. Coble
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS
Barry J. Barnett
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Moving from price-triggered to area revenue–triggered programs was perhaps the most common theme among 2007 farm bill proposals. Area revenue–triggered commodity programs may make farm-level revenue insurance products seem redundant, raising questions about why the federal government should continue both programs. Area revenue–triggered programs would remove much of the systemic risk faced by producers. As a result, private sector insurers may be able to insure the residual risk without federal involvement. This paper examines the effects of moving to area revenue–triggered commodity programs with a focus on public policy issues that would likely arise.

Keywords

commodity programsrevenue insurancesystemic riskD81G22Q18

Information

Type
Invited Paper Sessions
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 40 , Issue 2 , August 2008 , pp. 431 - 442
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Babcock, B.A., and Hart, C.E.. “How Much ‘Safety’ is Available under the U.S. Proposal to the WTO?” Center for Agricultural and Rural Development Briefing Paper 05-BP 48, Ames, IA, November 2005.Google Scholar
Babcock, B.A., and Paulson, N.D.. “Crop Insurance: Inside or Outside the Farm Bill?” Iowa Ag Review 13,1(Winter 2007).Google Scholar
Coble, K.H., and Barnett, B.J.. “The Impact of Alternative Farm Bill Designs on the Aggregate Distribution of Farm Program Payments.” Presentation at Domestic and Trade Impacts of U.S. Farm Policy: Future Directions and Challenges, Washington, DC, November 15-16, 2007.Google Scholar
Coble, K.H., and Dismukes, R.. “Distributional and Risk Reduction Effects of Commodity Revenue Program Design.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Allied Social Science Association, New Orleans, LA, January 4—6, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coble, K.H., Dismukes, R., and Glauber, J.W.. “Private Crop Insurers and the Reinsurance Fund Allocation Decision.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 89(August 2007):582–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glauber, J.W., and Collins, K.J.. “Crop Insurance, Disaster Assistance, and the Role of the Federal Government in Providing Catastrophic Risk Protection.” Agricultural Finance Review 62(Fall 2002):81–101.Google Scholar
Ker, A.P., and Ergun, A.T.. “On the Revelation of Private Information in the U.S. Crop Insurance Program.” Journal of Risk and Insurance 74(December 2007):761–76.Google Scholar
Kramer, R.A. “Federal Crop Insurance, 1938–1982.” Agricultural History 57(April 1983):181–200.Google Scholar
Mason, C., Hayes, D.J., and Lence, S.H.. “Systemic Risk in U.S. Crop Reinsurance Programs.” Agricultural Finance Review 63(Spring 2003):23–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miranda, M.J. “Area Yield Crop Insurance Reconsidered” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73(November 1991):233–42.Google Scholar
Miranda, M.J., and Glauber, J.W.. “Providing Crop Disaster Assistance through a Modified Deficiency Payment Program.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73(November 1991):1233–1243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miranda, M.J., and Glauber, J.W.. “Systemic Risk, Reinsurance, and the Failure of Crop Insurance Markets.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 79(February 1997):206–15.Google Scholar
Offutt, S.E., and Lins, D.A.. “Income Insurance for U.S. Commodity Producers: Program Issues and Design Alternatives.” North Central Journal of Agricultural Economics 7(January 1985):61–69.Google Scholar
Vedenov, D.V., Epperson, J.E., and Barnett, B.J.. “Designing Catastrophe Bonds to Securitize Systemic Risks in Agriculture: The Case of Georgia Cotton.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 31(2006):318–38.Google Scholar
Vedenov, D.V., Miranda, M.J., Dismukes, R., and Glauber, J.W.. “Economic Analysis of the Standard Reinsurance Agreement.” Agricultural Finance Review 64(2004):119–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vedenov, D.V., Miranda, M.J., Dismukes, R., and Glauber, J.W.. “Portfolio Allocation and Alternative Structures of the Standard Reinsurance Agreement.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 31(2006):57–73.Google Scholar