Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-5kfdg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-28T05:29:28.562Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Brazil's New Floating Exchange Rate Regime and Competitiveness in the World Poultry Market

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Ecio F. Costa
Ecio F. Costa*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602-7509
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In early 1999, Brazil devalued its currency, increasing its competitiveness in the poultry industry and capturing world market share. This paper discusses the devaluation and its effects on Brazil's trade, evaluates preliminary statistics on the impact of the devaluation on world poultry markets, and reports the results from a computable general equilibrium (CGE) simulation of the devaluation. The medium-run CGE results are compared to the short-run impacts reflected in the preliminary statistics.

Keywords

Brazilcurrency devaluationGTAPpoultryworld market share421

Information

Type
Invited Paper Sessions
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 33 , Issue 2 , August 2001 , pp. 367 - 375
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bean, Casey E. “Japan Semi-Annual Poultry Report 2000.” Attache Report, Foreign Agricultural Service, Washington, DC, 2000.Google Scholar
Foreign Agricultural Service. Total Broiler Meat Production Table. Commodity and Marketing Programs, 2000. http://www.fas.usda.gov/dlp/circular/2000/00-031p/poultry.html.Google Scholar
Foreign Agricultural Service. Total Broiler Meat Export Table. Commodity and Marketing Programs, 2000. http://www.fas.usda.gov/dlp/circular/2000/00-031p/poultry.html.Google Scholar
Good, Dale L. “Singapore Annual Poultry Report 1999.” Attache Report, Foreign Agricultural Service, Washington, DC, 1999.Google Scholar
Grennes, Thomas. International Economics. Engle-wood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1984.Google Scholar
Hertel, Thomas W.Global Trade Analysis: Modeling and Applications. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Hommez, Caroline. “EU Annual Poultry Report 2000.” Attache Report, Foreign Agricultural Service, Washington, DC, 2000.Google Scholar
Houck, James P.Elements of Agricultural Trade Policies. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press, Inc., 1986.Google Scholar
Instituto de Pesquisas Económicas e Aplicadas (IPEA). IPCA—Tendencia Prospectiva para 6 Meses (percent) Mensal, 2000. http://www.ipeadata.gov.br/ipeaweb.dll.Google Scholar
O'Connor, Leslie. “Brazil Annual Poultry Report 1999.” Attache Report, Foreign Agricultural Service, Washington, DC, 1999.Google Scholar
Shull, Philip A. “Argentina Annual Poultry Report 1999.” Attache Report, Foreign Agricultural Service, Washington, DC, 1999.Google Scholar
Verdonk, Ron. “United Arab Emirates Annual-Revised Poultry Report 1999.” Attache Report, Foreign Agricultural Service, Washington, DC, 1999.Google Scholar
Wetzel, Howard R. “Hong Kong Semi-Annual Poultry Report 2000.” Attache Report, Foreign Agricultural Service, Washington, DC, 2000.Google Scholar
Wiggin, Geoffrey. “Russian Federation Annual Poultry Report 1999.” Attache Report, Foreign Agricultural Service, Washington, DC, 1999.Google Scholar
Wilson, John H. “Saudi Annual Poultry Report 1999.” Attache Report, Foreign Agricultural Service, Washington, DC, 1999.Google Scholar