Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-mz6gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-30T11:55:59.720Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

UNDOING THE EFFECTS OF UNPROPITIOUS LUNAR OMENS: ADDITIONS TO K.6018+// (BM 46590, K.13919, AND 82-3-23, 108)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2025

Aino Hätinen*
Affiliation:
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munich, Munich, Germany
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article presents editions and hand-copies of the cuneiform tablet BM 46590 and the tablet fragments K.13919 and 82-3-23, 108. These new pieces either duplicate or expand the ritual for undoing the effects of unpropitious lunar omens known from K.6018+//, providing new information on Akkadian incantation-prayers to the moon god. Most importantly, the prayer “Sîn 5”, previously known only from a couple of fragmentary lines, can now be read almost in full.

إبطال تأثيرات العلامات القمرية غير المواتية: الإضافات إلى K.6018+// BM 46590)، K.13919، و82-3-23، 108)

بقلم: أينو هاتينين

تقدم هذه المقالة طبعات ونسخًا يدوية من اللوح المسماري BM 46590 وشظايا اللوح K.13919 و82-3-23، 108. هذه القطع الجديدة إما تكرر أو توسع الطقوس الخاصة بإلغاء آثار البشائر القمرية غير المواتية المعروفة من K.6018+//، مما يوفر معلومات جديدة عن صلوات التعويذة الأكادية لإله القمر. والأهم من ذلك، يمكن الآن قراءة الصلاة ”سين 5“، التي كانت معروفة سابقًا فقط من بضعة أسطر مجزأة، بالكامل تقريبًا.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - SA
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the same Creative Commons licence is used to distribute the re-used or adapted article and the original article is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained prior to any commercial use.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The British Institute for the Study of Iraq (Gertrude Bell Memorial)

Introduction

Signs manifesting in the moon’s appearance formed a significant part of Mesopotamian celestial divination: the rising of the moon, its appearance, and its contact with other celestial bodies were diligently observed and interpreted.Footnote 1 These observations – especially the reappearance of the moon at the beginning of the month and the simultaneous visibility of the moon and the sun during the full moon in the middle of the month – offered the basis for time-keeping in Mesopotamia.Footnote 2 At the same time, they were omens that could express the contentment or the discontentment of the moon god (or other gods).Footnote 3 The most dramatic omen was the lunar eclipse, and the evil it heralded could be staved off by different kinds of rituals, ranging from sacrificing a human substitute for the king to performing namburbi-rituals for undoing the evil of the eclipse or other apotropaic rituals that offered protection against the evil of the eclipse.Footnote 4 Other kinds of unpropitious lunar omens, including, for example, deviations from the ideal lunar phases, different kinds of light phenomena, and movements of planets in relation to the moon, also needed countermeasures.Footnote 5 An astrological report that deals with an observation of full moon on the 16th day (i.e., a deviation from the ideal scheme of full moon on the 15th) includes a closing passage underlining the importance of proper ritual actions: ana muḫḫi tāmarāti agannâti ša sî[n ša]rru lā išâṭ lū namburbû lū [mim]ma dullu ša ana muḫḫi qerbu šarru līpuš “The [ki]ng must not become negligent about these observations of the mo[on]; let the king perform either a namburbi or [so]me ritual which is pertinent to it.” (Hunger 1992: no. 320 r. 6–9). Thus, it seems that a universal namburbi, meant to undo the evil emanating from all possible omens, was a legitimate option in case of all unpropitious lunar observations.Footnote 6

A further ritual text, K.6018+//, is specifically dedicated to undoing the unpropitious effects of lunar observations, as indicated in the rubric it contains for some of the incantation-prayers to Sîn: ka.inim.ma šá igi.du 8.a d30 ḫul sig 5.ga.kam “The wording for making an unpropitious appearance of the moon good”.Footnote 7 The prescribed ritual actions mainly involve the fabrication and knotting of woollen bands and the fabrication of female and male puppets, which are then thrown into the river. Similar actions are well-known not only from namburbi-rituals but also from other procedures that aim at freeing the patient from contamination.Footnote 8 The incantation-prayers recited during the ritual actions thematise the transferral of the evil and sending it to Apsû (“Sîn 5” and “Sîn 6a-b”) as well as the confession of transgressions that may have led to divine disfavour (“Sîn 7”).

In the recent re-edition of K.6018+// (Hätinen 2021: 497–506), two main manuscripts of the text were identified: MS A = K.6018+ (Loretz and Mayer 1978: no. 59), a Neo-Assyrian tablet from Ashurbanipal’s Library, and MS B = CBS 1695 (Hätinen 2021: pls. 9–10), a Neo-Babylonian tablet of unknown provenance. Manuscripts of other texts (Diⓖiršadaba, anti-witchcraft rituals) that contain the prayers “Sîn 6a”Footnote 9 or “Sîn 6b”Footnote 10 were also included. That edition can now be augmented by a new manuscript, BM 46590, and two newly identified joins to K.6018+ (MS A), K.13919 and 82-3-23, 108.Footnote 11

BM 46590: A duplicate of K.6018+

BM 46590 (81-8-30, 56) is a Neo-Babylonian single-column tablet deriving from H. Rassam’s Babylonian excavations.Footnote 12 It is only partially preserved, but the main damage is found on the mostly uninscribed reverse; the tablet’s dimensions indicate that no lines are entirely missing. The text is divided into sections by single horizontal lines, with no colophon on the reverse.

Compared to K.6018+//, BM 46590, with its total of thirty-three lines, contains a compact version of the ritual meant to dispel the negative influence of unpropitious lunar observations. Importantly, it contains almost in full the prayer that was previously known only from the few fragmentary lines in K.6018, 1′–3′ (“Sîn 5” according to the numbering established by W. R. Mayer).Footnote 13 The incipit of this prayer can now be determined to be Sîn nannār šamê [u ? erṣeti ?] (“O Sîn, luminary of heaven [and? earth?]”), adding a further incipit with the epithet/appellation nannāru “luminary” to the Akkadian incantation-prayers to the moon god. This prayer does not have a rubric in BM 46590, but K.6018+ contains the designation “šu’ila-prayer to Sîn”.Footnote 14 The themes in the prayer include the transferral of harmful influence and the gaining of divine protection; these seem to be required so that the patient will retain his beneficial relationship to his peers (o. 7: “May I be pleasing to my brothers (and) my associates!”) and the divine and human authorities (o. 8: “May I be pleasing to god, king, courtier, and noble!”).

The prayer “Sîn 5” in BM 46590, 1–10 is followed by ritual instructions that are known from K.6018+//, 5′–7′ (see the edition of K.6018+ + K.13919 below). These actions begin with the arrangement of ritual offerings (juniper incense, beer) before Sîn after the moonrise. After this, the text instructs to spin white wool into yarn and to tie seven knots into the yarn. The white, knotted yarn is then placed on the patient’s neck. Whereas the further ritual instructions in K.6018+// include the fashioning of a female puppet from clay,Footnote 15 manipulation of multi-coloured yarn (knotted and covered with the left heel),Footnote 16 and manipulation of combed wool (placed on the patient’s neck),Footnote 17 the instructions in BM 46590 directly proceed to the section in which a male puppet is formed out of clay and then thrown into the river.Footnote 18 Before this last ritual action, the prayer “Sîn 6b” is included in the instructions in BM 46590, 16–24.Footnote 19

Edition of BM 46590

Fig. 1. Hand-copy of BM 46590, obverse

Fig. 2. Hand-copy of BM 46590, reverse

Transliteration

Fig. 3. Hand-copy of (K.6018+ +) K.13919

Fig. 4. Hand-copy of 82-3-23, 108

Two joins to K.6018+ (AOAT 34 no. 59): K.13919 and 82-3-23, 108

The fragments K.13919 and 82-3-23, 108 join the tablet K.6018+, published by O. Loretz and W. R. Mayer (1978: no. 59). K.13919 belongs to the obverse of the tablet, preserving the end of the rubric for the prayer “Sîn 5” (K.6018+, o. 4′), part of the ritual instruction in K 6018+, o. 5′–7′, and a part of the prayer “Sîn 6a” in K 6018+//, o. 8′–11′. 82-3-23, 108, which is an indirect join, forms a narrow part of the tablet’s left edge and preserves the beginnings of fifteen lines of text on its reverse. The content of 82-3-23, 108 is similar to BM 46590 (edited above), although šullim[anni] in 82-3-23, 108, r. 6′ does not have an equivalent in BM 46590.

The transliteration given here presents additions and improvements to the edition of K.6018+ in Hätinen 2021: 498–503. In the case of K.6018+, o. 1′–3′, these are based on BM 46590. The first line after the gap in the composite text (x+22′ in Hätinen 2021: 498) corresponds to 82-3-23, 108, r. 9′ here.

Copies: Figs. 34

Duplicates

K.6018+ + K.13919, o. 1′–11′ (= K.6018+//, 1′–11′)

Fig. 5. Sketch of the joining pieces K.6018+ + K.13919 (+) 82-3-23, 108, obverse

Fig. 6. Sketch of the joining pieces K.6018+ + K.13919 (+) 82-3-23, 108, reverse

Footnotes

1 The significance of lunar omens is exemplified by the fact that they are presented in the first twenty-two tablets of the omen collection Enūma Anu Enlil; see the overview in Koch Reference Koch2015: 163–171. In addition, the overview of text headings in H. Hunger’s edition of astrological reports (Hunger Reference Hunger1992: 369–373) shows that observations of the moon formed the better part of the corpus. For a further discussion on the significance of the moon and the moon god in the context of celestial divination, see Hätinen Reference Hätinen2021: 150–181.

2 See, for example, Steele Reference Steele, Radner and Robson2011 and Hätinen Reference Hätinen2021: 91–135. For the latest overview of the concept of time and the moon’s role as a time indicator, see Brandes Reference Brandes2023.

3 See Hätinen Reference Hätinen2021: 156–163.

4 See Hätinen Reference Hätinen2021: 175–181. For the substitute king ritual, see especially Parpola Reference Parpola1983: XXII–XXXII and Verderame Reference Verderame, Ambos and Verderame2013: 317–321. The single known namburbi-ritual explicitly meant for averting the evil of a lunar eclipse is edited in Maul Reference Maul1994: 458–460. For the so-called Eclipse Hemerology, a set of calendrical rituals against the evil of an eclipse, see Koch-Westenholz 2001: 75–77 and Livingstone Reference Livingstone2013: 195–198.

5 See Hätinen Reference Hätinen2021: 163–167 These omens can be characterized as “observations of the moon” (tāmarāti ša sîn), and they form the first fourteen tablets in the omens series Enūma Anu Enlil (Weidner Reference Weidner1941: 318).

6 See “Universalnamburbi 1”, for which some manuscripts include a section listing different celestial omina, including lunar observations (Maul Reference Maul1994: 469–470).

7 See the editions in Mayer Reference Mayer1976: 529–532 and Hätinen Reference Hätinen2021: 497–506. The prayer “Sîn 6a-b” has also been treated in the context of Diⓖiršadaba-prayers (Lambert Reference Lambert1974: 294–297; Jaques Reference Jaques2015: 231–238). See also the description of the ritual in Reiner Reference Reiner1995: 135–136, there understood to be a ritual “in order to turn the evil into good at the first visibility of the moon”.

8 See the discussion in Hätinen Reference Hätinen2021: 165. For the river’s role in the namburbi-rituals, see Maul Reference Maul1994: 85–89.

9 MS E: K.8183, 8′–12′ (Abusch and Schwemer Reference Abusch and Schwemer2016: pl. 68).

10 MS C (BAM 316, vi 14–23), MS D (LKA 25, 1.S ii 3′–10′) and MS F (Si. 849, r. 5′–11′; Geers Ac 38).

11 All of these pieces were identified in the context of the project Electronic Babylonian Literature (eBL) at LMU Munich and they are published here courtesy of the Trustees of the British Museum. I was able to collate the tablets and personally confirm the joins in March 2024. Before that, several colleagues had helped me in preparing the edition: A preliminary transliteration of BM 46590 was included in the notes that M. J. Geller generously gave for the use of the eBL project, and that tablet was photographed by Zs. J. Földi during his visit to the British Museum in November 2019. The fragment 82-3-23, 108 was brought to my attention by A. C. Heinrich and the plausible indirect join to K.6018+ was checked by K. Simkó at the British Museum. I thank all of them for their direct or indirect help. It was not possible to include these manuscripts in the edition of K.6018+// in Hätinen Reference Hätinen2021: 497–506, but some restorations that were confirmed by BM 46590 were indicated in that edition.

12 It belongs to the consignment 81-8-30 that includes tablets from Babylon, Borsippa (Ibrahim al-Khalil), and Dilbat (Dailem), the locations where Rassam was excavating at the time (Reade Reference Reade and Leichty1986: xxxi–xxxii).

13 Mayer Reference Mayer1976: 408; see also the overview of the Akkadian incantation-prayers to the moon god in Hätinen Reference Hätinen2021: 13–14.

14 K.6018+ +K.13919, 4′: [ka].inim.ma šu.íl.lád⸣30.[kam] (see the edition below).

15 K.6018+//, 14′–21′ (Hätinen Reference Hätinen2021: 498); this section is only partly preserved.

16 K.6018+//, x+24′–x+26′ (Hätinen Reference Hätinen2021: 499), corresponding to 82-3-23, 108, r. 11′–13′ in the edition below.

17 K.6018+//, x+34′–x+35′ (Hätinen Reference Hätinen2021: 499).

18 K.6018+//, x+45′–x+48′ (Hätinen Reference Hätinen2021: 500–501).

19 See Mayer Reference Mayer1976: 408 and Hätinen Reference Hätinen2021: 13 and 497.

References

Abusch, T. and Schwemer, D. 2016. Corpus of Mesopotamian Anti-Witchcraft Rituals Volume 2. Ancient Magic and Divination 8/2. Leiden and Boston: Brill.10.1163/9789004318557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandes, T. 2023. Das babylonisch-assyrische Konzept von Zeit im 2. und 1. Jahrtausend v. Chr. dubsar 26. Münster: Zaphon.Google Scholar
Hunger, H. 1992. Astrological Reports to Assyrian Kings. State Archives of Assyria 8. Helsinki: Helsinki University Press.Google Scholar
Hätinen, A. 2021. The Moon God Sîn in Neo-Assyrian and Neo-Babylonian Times. dubsar 20. Münster: Zaphon.10.2307/jj.18654660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hätinen, A. 2022. “Righteous Sufferer (Ludlul bēl nēmeqi). With contributions by Zs. J. Földi, A. C. Heinrich, E. Jiménez and T. D. N. Mitto. Translated by Benjamin R. Foster”. Electronic Babylonian Library. URL: https://doi.org/10.5282/ebl/l/2/2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaques, M. 2015. Mon dieu qu’ai-je fait? Les diⓖir-šà-dab(5)-ba et la piété privée en Mesopotamie. Orbis Biblicus et Orientalis 273. Fribourg and Göttingen: Academic Press and Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Koch, U. S. 2015. Mesopotamian Divination Texts: Conversing with the Gods. Sources from the First Millennium BCE. Guides to the Mesopotamian Textual Record 7. Münster: Ugarit-Verlag.Google Scholar
Koch-Westenholz, U. 2001. “Babylonian Views of Eclipses” in Gyselen, R., ed. Démons et merveilles d’Orient. Bures-sur-Yvette: Groupe pour l’Étude de la Civilisation du Moyen-Orient, pp. 7184.Google Scholar
Lambert, W. G. 1974. “Dingir.šà.dib.ba Incantations”. Journal of Near Eastern Studies 33: 267322.10.1086/372362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Livingstone, A. 2013. Hemerologies of Assyrian and Babylonian Scholars. Cornell University Studies in Assyriology and Sumerology 25. Bethesda, Maryland: CDL Press.Google Scholar
Loretz, O. and Mayer, W. R. 1978. Šu-ila-Gebete. Supplement zu L. W. King, Babylonian Magic and Sorcery. Alter Orient und Altes Testament 34. Kevelaer and Neukirchen-Vluyn: Butzon & Bercker and Neukirchener Verlag.Google Scholar
Maul, S. M. 1994. Zukunftsbewältigung. Eine Untersuchung altorientalischen Denkens anhand der babylonisch-assyrischen Löserituale (Namburbi). Baghdader Forschungen 18. Mainz: Verlag Philipp von Zabern.Google Scholar
Mayer, W. R. 1976. Untersuchungen zur Formensprache der babylonischen “Gebetsbeschwörungen”. Studia Pohl Series Maior 5. Rome: Biblical Institute Press.Google Scholar
Parpola, S. 1983. Letters from Assyrian Scholars to the Kings Esarhaddon and Assurbanipal. Part II: Commentary and Appendices. Alter Orient und Altes Testament 5/2. Kevelaer and Neukirchen-Vluyn: Butzon & Bercker and Neukirchener Verlag.Google Scholar
Reade, J. E. 1986. “Introduction. Rassam’s Babylonian Collection: The Excavations and the Archives” in Leichty, E., ed. Catalogue of the Babylonian Tablets in the British Museum Volume VI: Tablets from Sippar 1. London: British Museum Publications, pp. xiiixxxvi.Google Scholar
Reiner, E. 1958. Šurpu. A Collection of Sumerian and Akkadian Incantations. Archiv für Orientforschung Beiheft 11. Graz: Selbstverlag des Herausgebers.Google Scholar
Reiner, E. 1995. Astral Magic in Babylonia. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 85. Philadephia: The American Philosophical Society.Google Scholar
Steele, J. M. 2011. “Making Sense of Time: Observational and Theoretical Calendars” in Radner, K. and Robson, E., eds. The Oxford Handbook of Cuneiform Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 470485.Google Scholar
Veenhof, K. R. 2005. Letters in the Louvre. Altbabylonische Briefe in Umschrift und Übersetzung 14. Leiden and Boston: Brill.10.1163/9789047416876CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verderame, L. 2013. “Means of Substitution. The Use of Figurines, Animals, and Human Beings as Substitutes in Assyrian Rituals” in Ambos, C. and Verderame, L., eds. Approaching Rituals in Ancient Cultures. Questioni di rito: Rituali come fonte di conoscenza delle religioni e delle concezioni del mondo nelle culture antiche. Proceedings of the Conference, November 28–30, 2011, Roma. Pisa and Roma: Fabrizio Serra Editore, pp. 301323.Google Scholar
Weidner, E. F. 1941. “Die astrologische Serie Enûma Anu Enlil”. Archiv für Orientforschung 14: 172195.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Hand-copy of BM 46590, obverse

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Hand-copy of BM 46590, reverse

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Hand-copy of (K.6018+ +) K.13919

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Hand-copy of 82-3-23, 108

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Sketch of the joining pieces K.6018+ + K.13919 (+) 82-3-23, 108, obverse

Figure 5

Fig. 6. Sketch of the joining pieces K.6018+ + K.13919 (+) 82-3-23, 108, reverse