Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-fg9bn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-08T05:46:10.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The customary law of non-international armed conflict - Evidence from the United States Civil War

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 January 2010

Michael Harris Hoffman
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

James Surget made no impact on history. He did, however, make an impression on Washington Ford. The latter sued him in 1866 regarding the destruction of 200 bales of cotton.

In May 1862, Ford owned a plantation in Mississippi, a state then in rebellion against United States authority. The local commander of rebelling forces ordered his troops to burn all cotton along the Mississippi River that was vulnerable to capture by the United States army. Surget assisted in the destruction of Ford's cotton. Ford sued him to recover for its value.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
International Review of the Red Cross (1961 - 1997) , Volume 30 , Issue 277 , August 1990 , pp. 322 - 344
Copyright
Copyright © International Committee of the Red Cross 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

*

The opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and are not necessarily those of the American Red Cross.

References

Bibliography of Legal Authorities

(Georgia) Reports of Cases in Law and Equity Argued and Determined in The Supreme Court of Georgia, Charlottesville, Virginia: The Michie Company, Law Publishers Volumes 42, 44.Google Scholar
(Kentucky) Reports of Selected Civil and Criminal Cases Decided in The Court of Appeals of Kentucky, Cincinnati, Ohio: The W. H. Anderson Company, volumes 63, 64.Google Scholar
(New York) Barbour, Oliver L., Reports of Cases in Law and Equity Determined in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Albany, New York: W.C. Little Law Bookseller, Volume 45.Google Scholar
(North Carolina) Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of North Carolina, E. M. Uzzell and Co., Volume 71.Google Scholar
(Tennessee) Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in The Supreme Court of Tennessee, Louisville, Kentucky: Felter Law Book Company, Volumes 43, 45, 48.Google Scholar
(United States) Wallace, Henry E., Philadelphia Reports, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: J. B. Hunter, Volume 5.Google Scholar
(United States) Official Opinions of the Attorneys General of the United States, Washington, D.C.: W. H. & O. H. Morrison, Volumes 10, 11.Google Scholar
(United States) Cases Argued and Decided in The Supreme Court of the United States, New York: Lawyers Edition, The Lawyers Cooperative Publishing Company, Rochester, Volumes 17, 21, 23, 24, 33.Google Scholar