Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-fg9bn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-27T12:22:41.410Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mutational and Susceptibility Genetics Are Different Clinical Paradigms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2005

Allen D. Roses
Allen D. Roses
Affiliation:
Center for Human Genetics, Departments of Medicine, (Neurology) and Neurobiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

During the past 2 years there have been several consensus conferences on diagnostic testing for Alzheimer's disease (AD), specifically related to the use of new genetic tests (Farrer et al., 1995; Relkin et al., 1996). Unfortunately there is an appearance of controversy between some of the published opinions and the empirical data (Saunders et al., 1996; Slooter et al., 1996). The clinical paradigm for AD has changed from “ruling out” a small list of reversible and treatment causes of dementia to “ruling in” the diagnosis of AD using adjunctive genetic tests with a high positive predictive value for some patients (Roses & Saunders, in press).

Information

Type
Guest Editorials
Information
International Psychogeriatrics , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , March 1997 , pp. 7 - 10
Copyright
© 1997 International Psychogeriatric Association