Hostname: page-component-6bb9c88b65-6vlrh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-25T01:46:50.105Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Bargaining Theory of Conflict with Evolutionary Preferences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2017

Andrew T. Little  and
Thomas Zeitzoff
Get access

Abstract

Bargaining models play a central role in international relations, particularly in the study of conflict. A common criticism of this approach is that it fails to account for nonmaterial (e.g., psychological) factors that may influence the bargaining process. We augment a standard bargaining model by allowing actors’ preferences over conflict to diverge from the “fitness” payoffs (e.g., resources) typical of such models. Preferences are subject to evolutionary forces—those who attain high fitness reproduce more. We find that (1) there is a trade-off where being “irrationally” tough leads to better bargains but also more inefficient conflict; (2) actors develop behavioral biases consistent with empirical findings from psychology and behavioral economics; and (3) these behavioral biases inevitably lead to conflict. By bridging the strategic and psychological approaches to conflict, our models provide new insights into questions such as how changes in military and intelligence-gathering technology affect the likelihood and expected cost of war, and how to interpret the purported decline of violence over recent human history.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
International Organization , Volume 71 , Issue 3 , Summer 2017 , pp. 523 - 557
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Acharya, Avidit, Blackwell, Matthew, and Sen, Maya. 2016a. Explaining Preferences from Behavior: A Cognitive Dissonance Approach. Manuscript, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Acharya, Avidit, Blackwell, Matthew, and Sen, Maya. 2016b. The Political Legacy of American Slavery. Journal of Politics 78 (3):621–41.Google Scholar
Acharya, Avidit, and Grillo, Edoardo. 2015. War with Crazy Types. Political Science Research and Methods 3 (2):281–307.Google Scholar
Adler, Robert S., Rosen, Benson, and Silverstein, Elliot M.. 1998. Emotions in Negotiation: How to Manage Fear and Anger. Negotiation Journal 14 (2):161–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arena, Philip, and Wolford, Scott. 2012. Arms, Intelligence, and War. International Studies Quarterly 56 (2):351–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atran, Scott. 2006. The Moral Logic and Growth of Suicide Terrorism. Washington Quarterly 29 (2):127–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Axelrod, R., and Hamilton, William D. 1981. The Evolution of Cooperation. Science 211 (4489):1390–96.Google Scholar
Banks, Jeffrey S. 1990. Equilibrium Behavior in Crisis Bargaining Games. American Journal of Political Science 34 (3):599–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bar-Tal, Daniel. 2001. From Intractable Conflict Through Conflict Resolution to Reconciliation: Psychological Analysis. Political Psychology 21 (2):351–65.Google Scholar
Barkow, Jerome H., Cosmides, Leda, and Tooby, John. 1995. The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bauer, Michal, Blattman, Christopher, Chytilová, Julie, Henrich, Joseph, Miguel, Edward, and Mitts, Tamar. 2016. Can War Foster Cooperation? Journal of Economic Perspectives 30 (3):249–74.Google Scholar
Bester, Helmut, and Güth, Werner. 1998. Is Altruism Evolutionarily Stable? Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 34 (2):193–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boehmer, Charles, Gartzke, Erik, and Nordstrom, Timothy. 2004. Do Intergovernmental Organizations Promote Peace? World Politics 57 (1):1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowles, Samuel. 1998. Endogenous Preferences: The Cultural Consequences of Markets and Other Economic Institutions. Journal of Economic Literature 36 (1):75–111.Google Scholar
Braumoeller, Bear. 2013. Is War Disappearing? Paper presented at the 109th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, September, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce. 1981. The War Trap. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce. 1985. Toward a Scientific Understanding of International Conflict: A Personal View. International Studies Quarterly 29 (2):121–36.Google Scholar
Bueno De Mesquita, Bruce, Morrow, James D., Siverson, Randolph M., and Smith, Alastair. 1999. An Institutional Explanation of the Democratic Peace. American Political Science Review 93 (4):791–807.Google Scholar
Callen, Michael, Isaqzadeh, Mohammad, Long, James D., and Sprenger, Charles. 2014. Violence and Risk Preference: Experimental Evidence from Afghanistan. The American Economic Review 104 (1):123–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cederman, Lars-Erik. 1997. Emergent Actors in World Politics: How States and Nations Develop and Dissolve. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cheung-Blunden, Violet, and Blunden, Bill. 2008. Paving the Road to War with Group Membership, Appraisal Antecedents, and Anger. Aggressive Behavior 34 (2):175–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Colgan, Jeff, and Weeks, Jessica. 2014. Revolution, Personalist Dictatorships, and International Conflict. International Organization 69 (1):163–94.Google Scholar
Dafoe, Allan, and Caughey, Devin M.. 2016. Honor and War: Using Southern Presidents to Identify Reputational Effects in International Conflict. World Politics 68 (2):341–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawes, Christopher T., Fowler, James H., Johnson, Tim, McElreath, Richard, and Smirnov, Oleg. 2007. Egalitarian Motives in Humans. Nature 446 (7,137):794–96.Google Scholar
Dawkins, Richard. 2006. The Selfish Gene. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Debs, Alexandre, and Goemans, Hein E.. 2010. Regime Type, the Fate of Leaders, and War. American Political Science Review 104 (3):430–45.Google Scholar
Debs, Alexandre, and Weiss, Jessica Chen. 2014. Circumstances, Domestic Audiences, and Reputational Incentives in International Crisis Bargaining. Journal of Conflict Resolution 60 (3):403–33.Google Scholar
Dekel, Eddie, Ely, Jeffrey C., and Yilankaya, Okan. 2007. Evolution of Preferences. Review of Economic Studies 74 (3):685–704.Google Scholar
Delton, Andrew W., Krasnow, Max M., Cosmides, Leda, and Tooby, John. 2011. Evolution of Direct Reciprocity Under Uncertainty Can Explain Human Generosity in One-shot Encounters. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108 (32):13,335–40.Google Scholar
Downs, George W., and Rocke, David M.. 1994. Conflict, Agency, and Gambling for Resurrection: The Principal-Agent Problem Goes to War. American Journal of Political Science 38 (2):362–80.Google Scholar
Ekman, Paul. 1992. An Argument for Basic Emotions. Cognition and Emotion 6 (3–4):169–200.Google Scholar
Fazal, Tanisha M. 2014. Dead Wrong? Battle Deaths, Military Medicine, and Exaggerated Reports of War's Demise. International Security 39 (1):95–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearon, James, and Wendt, Alexander. 2002. Rationalism vs. Constructivism: A Skeptical View. In Handbook of International Relations, edited by Carlnaes, Walter, Risse, Thomas, and Simmons, Beth A., 52–72. London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
Fearon, James D. 1995. Rationalist Explanations for War. International Organization 49 (3):379–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehr, Ernst, and Gächter, Simon. 2002. Altruistic Punishment in Humans. Nature (415):137–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fey, Mark, and Ramsay, Kristopher W.. 2011. Uncertainty and Incentives in Crisis Bargaining: Game-Free Analysis of International Conflict. American Journal of Political Science 55 (1):149–69.Google Scholar
Frank, Robert H. 1988. Passions Within Reason: The Strategic Role of the Emotions. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
Getmansky, Anna, and Zeitzoff, Thomas. 2014. Terrorism and Voting: The Effect of Rocket Threat on Voting in Israeli Elections. American Political Science Review 108 (3):588–604.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Michael J., Pasquale, Benjamin J., and Samii, Cyrus. 2014. Civil War and Social Cohesion: Lab-in-the-field Evidence from Nepal. American Journal of Political Science 58 (3):604–19.Google Scholar
Ginges, Jeremy, and Atran, Scott. 2011. War as a Moral Imperative (not Just Practical Politics by Other Means). Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 278 (1720):2930–38.Google Scholar
Ginges, Jeremy, Atran, Scott, Medin, Douglas, and Shikaki, Khalil. 2007. Sacred Bounds on Rational Resolution of Violent Political Conflict. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104 (18):7357–60.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Joshua S. 2011. Winning the War on War: The Decline of Armed Conflict Worldwide. London, UK: Penguin.Google Scholar
Güth, Werner, Schmittberger, Rolf, and Schwarze, Bernd. 1982. An Experimental Analysis of Ultimatum Bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 3 (4):367–88.Google Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., LeVeck, Brad L., Victor, David G., and Fowler, James H.. 2014. Decision Maker Preferences for International Legal Cooperation. International Organization 68 (4):845–76.Google Scholar
Hatemi, Peter K., and McDermott, Rose, eds. 2011. Man Is by Nature a Political Animal: Evolution, Biology, and Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Heifetz, Aviad, and Segev, Ella. 2004. The Evolutionary Role of Toughness in Bargaining. Games and Economic Behavior 49 (1):117–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henrich, Joseph, Boyd, Robert, Bowles, Samuel, Camerer, Colin, Fehr, Ernst, Gintis, Herbert, and Mcelreath, Richard. 2001. In Search of Homo Economicus: Behavioral Experiments in Fifteen Small-Scale Societies. The American Economic Review 91 (2):73–8.Google Scholar
Henrich, Joseph, Boyd, Robert, Bowles, Samuel, et al. 2005. “Economic Man” in Cross-Cultural Perspective: Behavioral Experiments in Fifteen Small-scale Societies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (6):795–815.Google Scholar
Hersh, Eitan D. 2013. Long-term Effect of September 11 on the Political Behavior of Victims’ Families and Neighbors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110 (52):20,959–63.Google Scholar
Hirsch-Hoefler, Sivan, Canetti, Daphna, Rapaport, Carmit, and Hobfoll, E. Stevan. 2016. Conflict Will Harden your Heart: Exposure to Violence, Psychological Distress, and Peace Barriers in Israel and Palestine. British Journal of Political Science 46 (4):845–859.Google Scholar
Horowitz, Donald L. 2003. The Deadly Ethnic Riot. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Horowitz, Michael C., and Stam, Allan C.. 2014. How Prior Military Experience Influences the Future Militarized Behavior of Leaders. International Organization 68 (3):527–59.Google Scholar
Huck, Steffen, and Oechssler, Jörg. 1999. The Indirect Evolutionary Approach to Explaining Fair Allocations. Games and Economic Behavior 28 (1):13–24.Google Scholar
Johnson, Dominic D.P., and Fowler, James H.. 2011. The Evolution of Overconfidence. Nature 477 (7,364):317–20.Google Scholar
Johnson, Dominic D.P., Weidmann, Nils B., and Cederman, Lars-Erik. 2011. Fortune Favours the Bold: an Agent-based Model Reveals Adaptive Advantages of Overconfidence in War. PloS one 6 (6):e20,851.Google Scholar
Jones, Benjamin F., and Olken, Benjamin A.. 2005. Do Leaders Matter? National Leadership and Growth Since World War II. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 120 (3):835–64.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, and Tversky, Amos. 1979. Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk. Econometrica 47 (2):263–91.Google Scholar
Kalyvas, Stathis. 2015. Is ISIS a Revolutionary Group and If Yes, What Are the Implications? Perspectives on Terrorism 9 (4). <http://www.terrorismanalysts.com/pt/index.php/pot/article/view/442/873>Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J. 1996. The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 2005. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kertzer, Joshua D. 2016. Resolve in International Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Krieger, D. 2011. The Challenge of Abolishing Nuclear Weapons. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Kydd, Andrew H. 2016. Comparing Conventional and Nuclear Worlds. Manuscript, University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Laurent, and Feldman, Marcus W.. 2008. War and the Evolution of Belligerence and Bravery. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 275 (1653):2877–85.Google Scholar
Lerner, Jennifer S., Gonzalez, Roxana M., Small, Deborah A., and Fischhoff, Baruch. 2003. Effects of Fear and Anger on Perceived Risks of Terrorism: A National Field Experiment. Psychological Science 14 (2):144–50.Google Scholar
Lerner, Jennifer S., and Keltner, Dacher. 2001. Fear, Anger, and Risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81 (1):146–59.Google Scholar
LeVeck, Brad L., Hughes, D. Alex, Fowler, James H., Hafner-Burton, Emilie, and Victor, David G.. 2014. The Role of Self-interest in Elite Bargaining. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111 (52):18,536–41.Google Scholar
Lopez, Anthony C. 2016. The Evolution of War: Theory and Controversy. International Theory 8 (1):83–139.Google Scholar
McDermott, Rose, Tingley, Dustin, Cowden, Jonathan, Frazzetto, Giovanni, and Johnson, Dominic D.P.. 2009. Monoamine Oxidase A Gene (MAOA) Predicts Behavioral Aggression Following Provocation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106 (7):2118–23.Google Scholar
McElreath, Richard. 2003. Reputation and the Evolution of Conflict. Journal of Theoretical Biology 220 (3):345–57.Google Scholar
Meirowitz, Adam, and Sartori, Anne E.. 2008. Strategic Uncertainty as a Cause of War. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 3 (4):327–52.Google Scholar
Minozzi, William. 2013. Endogenous Beliefs in Models of Politics. American Journal of Political Science 57 (3):566–81.Google Scholar
Nepstad, Sharon Erickson, and Bob, Clifford. 2006. When Do Leaders Matter? Hypotheses on Leadership Dynamics in Social Movements. Mobilization: An International Quarterly 11 (1):1–22.Google Scholar
Nisbett, Richard E., and Cohen, Dov. 1996. Culture of Honor: The Psychology of Violence in the South. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Petersen, Roger D. 2002. Understanding Ethnic Violence: Fear, Hatred, and Resentment in Twentieth-Century Eastern Europe. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pinker, Steven. 2011. The Better Angels of Our Nature: Why Violence Has Declined. London, UK: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Powell, Robert. 1999. In the Shadow of Power. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Powell, Robert. 2004. The Inefficient Use of Power: Conflict with Complete Information. American Political Science Review 98 (2):231–41.Google Scholar
Rand, David G., Tarnita, Corina E., Ohtsuki, Hisashi, and Nowak, Martin A.. 2013. Evolution of Fairness in the One-Shot Anonymous Ultimatum Game. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110 (7):2581–86.Google Scholar
Roth, Alvin E., Prasnikar, Vesna, Okuno-Fujiwara, Masahiro, and Zamir, Shmuel. 1991. Bargaining and Market Behavior in Jerusalem, Ljubljana, Pittsburgh, and Tokyo: An Experimental Study. The American Economic Review 81 (5):1068–95.Google Scholar
Ryan, Timothy J. 2017. No Compromise: Political Consequences of Moralized Attitudes. American Journal of Political Science 61 (2):409–23.Google Scholar
Sagan, Scott D., and Waltz, Kenneth N.. 1995. The Spread of Nuclear Weapons: A Debate. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
Scheff, Thomas J., and Retzinger, Suzanne M.. 2002. Emotions and Violence: Shame and Rage in Destructive Conflicts. Bloomington, IN: iUniverse.Google Scholar
Schelling, Thomas C. 1960. The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sell, Aaron, Tooby, John, and Cosmides, Leda. 2009. Formidability and the Logic of Human Anger. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106 (35):15,073–78.Google Scholar
Slantchev, Branislav L. 2003. The Power to Hurt: Costly Conflict with Completely Informed States. American Political Science Review 97 (1):123–33.Google Scholar
Slantchev, Branislav L., and Tarar, Ahmer. 2011. Mutual Optimism as a Rationalist Explanation of War. American Journal of Political Science 55 (1):135–48.Google Scholar
Smith, Alastair. 1996. Diversionary Foreign Policy in Democratic Systems. International Studies Quarterly 40 (1):133–53.Google Scholar
Smith, Alastair, and Stam, Allan C.. 2004. Bargaining and the Nature of War. Journal of Conflict Resolution 48 (6):783–813.Google Scholar
Stein, Rachel M. 2015. War and Revenge: Explaining Conflict Initiation by Democracies. American Political Science Review 109 (3):556–73.Google Scholar
Tajfel, Henri, and Turner, John. 1979. An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict. In The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, edited by Austin, W.G. and Worchel, S., chap. 3. Monterey, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Thayer, Bradley A. 2000. Bringing in Darwin: Evolutionary Theory, Realism, and International Politics. International Security 25 (2):124–51.Google Scholar
Tversky, Amos, and Kahneman, Daniel. 1986. Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions. Journal of Business 59 (4):251–78.Google Scholar
Voors, Maarten J., Nillesen, Eleonora E.M., Verwimp, Philip, Bulte, Erwin H., Lensink, Robert, and Van Soest, Daan P.. 2012. Violent Conflict and Behavior: a Field Experiment in Burundi. The American Economic Review 102 (2):941–64.Google Scholar
Wallace, Björn, Cesarini, David, Lichtenstein, Paul, and Johannesson, Magnus. 2007. Heritability of Ultimatum Game Responder Behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104 (40):15,631–34.Google Scholar
Wolpert, David, Jamison, Julian, Newth, David, and Harre, Michael. 2011. Strategic Choice of Preferences: The Persona Model. B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics 11 (1):1–37.Google Scholar
Young, H. Peyton. 1993. An Evolutionary Model of Bargaining. Journal of Economic Theory 49:145–68.Google Scholar
Zeitzoff, Thomas. 2014. Anger, Exposure to Violence, and Intragroup Conflict: A “Lab in the Field” Experiment in Southern Israel. Political Psychology 35 (3):309–35.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Little and Zeitzoff supplementary material

Little and Zeitzoff supplementary material

Download Little and Zeitzoff supplementary material(File)
File 784 KB