Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-rz4zl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-05T15:17:00.782Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Improved mating performance of male Anastrepha ludens (Diptera: Tephritidae) irradiated at low doses for release in sterile insect technique programmes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 August 2014

Juan Rull ,
Jose Arredondo  and
Francisco Diaz-Fleischer
Juan Rull*
Affiliation:
Instituto de Ecología, A.C., Km 2.5 Carretera Antigua a Coatepec, C.P.91070Xalapa, Veracruz, México
Jose Arredondo
Affiliation:
Subdirección de Desarrollo de Métodos, Campaña Nacional contra Moscas de la Fruta, Calle Central Poniente #14, 30700Tapachula, México
Francisco Diaz-Fleischer
Affiliation:
INBIOTECA, Universidad Veracruzana, Apartado Postal 250, C.P.91090Xalapa, Veracruz, México
*
*E-mail: juan.rull@inecol.edu.mx
Get access

Abstract

In this study, laboratory and field cage experiments were conducted to assess the performance of sterile mass-reared Mexican fruit fly Anastrepha ludens (Loew) irradiated at various doses. In small laboratory cages, the radiation dose was found to have no effect on adult emergence, flying adults or survival at 25 days. In field cages, non-irradiated males and males irradiated at 20 and 40 Gy were found to exhibit greater mating propensity than males irradiated at 60 and 80 Gy. In large field cages in competition with wild males, cohorts of flies (male and female) irradiated at the low dose of 40 Gy and wild non-irradiated flies mated randomly, while flies irradiated at the high standard dose of 80 Gy mated assortatively. Irrespective of the radiation dose, laboratory flies courted and attempted copulation significantly earlier in the day than wild flies. In large field cages, cohorts of flies irradiated at low doses, e.g. 40 Gy, tended to induce greater sterility into a cohort of wild flies than those irradiated at 80 Gy, but the difference was not significant. Our results suggest that lowering the radiation dose currently applied to mass-reared flies in the Mexican fruit fly eradication campaign would substantially improve male mating performance. This could result in greater sterility induction without posing a risk in areas where target pest populations naturally prevail and are under suppression during the early stages of eradication programmes.

Keywords

Anastrepha ludensDipteraTephritidaesterile insect techniqueirradiationsterility induction

Information

Type
Research Papers
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 34 , Issue S1 , November 2014 , pp. S28 - S34
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Allinghi, A., Calcagno, C., Petit-Marty, N., Gómez Cendra, P., Segura, D., Vera, T., Cladera, J., Gramajo, C., Willink, E. and Vilardi, J. C. (2007) Compatibility and competitiveness of a laboratory strain of Anastrepha fraterculus (Diptera: Tephritidae) after irradiation treatment. Florida Entomologist 90, 27–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aluja, M., Piñero, J., Lopez, M., Ruiz, C., Zuñiga, A., Piedra, E., Diaz-Fleisher, F. and Sivinski, J. (2000) New host plant records in Mexico for Anastrepha spp., Toxotrypana curvicauda (Gerstacker), Rhagoletis zoqui (Bush), Rhagoletis spp. and Hexachaeta spp. (Diptera: Tephritidae). Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 102, 802–815.Google Scholar
Collins, S. R., Weldon, C. W., Banos, C. and Taylor, P. W. (2008) Effects of irradiation dose rate on quality and sterility of Queensland fruit flies, Bactrocera tryoni (Froggatt). Journal of Applied Entomology 5, 398–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutiérrez-Ruelas, J. M. and Santiago, G. (2008) Situación actual de la campaña nacional contra moscas de la fruta en México, pp. 11–13. In Proceedings of the 7th Meeting of the Working Group of Fruit Flies of the Western Hemisphere, 2–7 November 2008 (edited by Montoy, P. J.a, Diaz-Fleischer, F. and Flores, S.) (SAGARPA/DGSV) Meeting publication, Mazatlán, México.Google Scholar
Gutierrez-Samperio, J., Reyes, J. and Villaseñor, A. (1993) National plan against fruit flies in Mexico, pp. 419–423. In Fruit Flies. Biology and Management (edited by Aluja, M. and Liedo, P.). Springer, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamada, R. (1980) Studies on the dispersal behavior of melon flies, Dacus cucurbitae Coquillett (Diptera: Tephritidae), and the influence of gamma irradiation on dispersal. Applied Entomology and Zoology 15, 363–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendrichs, J., Robinson, A. S., Cayol, J. P. and Enkerlin, W. (2002) Medfly areawide sterile insect technique programmes for prevention, suppression or eradication: the importance of mating behaviour studies. Florida Entomologist 85, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klassen, W. and Creech, J. F. (1973) Population suppression with dominant and conditional lethal mutations. Some important considerations and approaches, pp. 65–79. In Computer Models and Application of the Sterile-Male Technique. Proceedings of a Panel Organized by the Joint FAO/IAEA Division of Atomic Energy in Food and Agriculture, 13–17 December 1971, IAEA, Vienna, Austria. STI/PUB/340. IAEA, Vienna.Google Scholar
Klassen, W. and Curtis, C. F. (2005) History of the sterile insect technique, pp. 3–36. In Sterile Insect Technique. Principles and Practice in Area-Wide Integrated Pest Management (edited by Dyck, V. A., Hendrichs, J. and Robinson, A. S.). Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lux, S. A., Vilardi, J. C., Liedo, P., Gaggl, K., Calcagno, G. E., Munyiri, F. N., Vera, M. T. and Manso, F. (2002) Effects of irradiation on the courtship behavior of medfly (Diptera: Tephritidae) mass reared for the sterile insect technique. Florida Entomologist 85, 102–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meza-Hernández, J. S. and Díaz-Fleischer, F. (2006) Comparison of sexual compatibility between laboratory and wild Mexican fruit flies under laboratory and field conditions. Journal of Economic Entomology 99, 1979–1986.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reyes, J., Santiago, G. and Hernández, P. (2000) The Mexican fruit fly eradication programme, pp. 377–380. In Area-Wide Control of Fruit Flies and Other Insect Pests (edited by Tan, K. H.). Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia, Pulau Pinang.Google Scholar
Robinson, A. S. (2002) Mutations and their use in insect control. Mutation Research 511, 113–132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rull, J., Brunel, O. and Mendez, M. A. (2004) Mass rearing history negatively affects mating success of male Anastrepha ludens (Diptera: Tephritidae) reared for the sterile insect technique programs. Journal of Economic Entomology 98, 1510–1516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rull, J., Diaz-Fleischer, F. and Arredondo, J. (2007) Irradiation of Anastrepha ludens (Diptera: Tephritidae) revisited: optimizing sterility induction. Journal of Economic Entomology 97, 1153–1159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toledo, J., Rull, J., Oropeza, A., Hernandez, E. and Liedo, P. (2004) Irradiation of Anastrepha obliqua (Diptera: Tephritidae) revisited: optimizing sterility induction. Journal of Economic Entomology 97, 383–389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Webb, J. C., Sivinski, J. and Smittle, B. J. (1987) Acoustical courtship signals and sexual success in irradiated Caribbean fruit flies (Anastrepha suspensa) (Diptera: Tephritidae). Florida Entomologist 70, 103–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar