Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-w5vf4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-04T17:32:51.440Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Technology Assessment in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

Elisabeth Burdick ,
Jennifer Falotico-Taylor  and
James M. Young
Elisabeth Burdick
Affiliation:
Harvard School of Public Health
Jennifer Falotico-Taylor
Affiliation:
Harvard School of Public Health
James M. Young
Affiliation:
Harvard School of Public Health
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The majority of the 26 technology assessment articles from the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) follow the original purpose of the registry and evaluate the therapeutic capabilities of coronary artery bypass graft surgery. However, these registry data have also been used to identify risk factors for cardiovascular disease, to test diagnostic technologies, and to evaluate technological processes. Consideration of quality of life issues and the availability of cost data provide valuable additions to the continued use of the CASS for technology assessment.

Information

Type
Special Section: The Contribution Of Medical Registries To Technology Assessment
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , Spring 1991 , pp. 171 - 181
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1.Almeida, D., Bradford, J. M., Wenger, N. K., et al. Return to work after coronary bypass surgery. Circulation, 1983, 68(Suppl. II), II205.Google ScholarPubMed
2.Andersen, R. P.Will the real CASS stand up? A review and perspective on the Coronary Artery Surgery Study. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1986, 91, 698–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Berger, R. L., Davis, K. B., Kaiser, G. C., et al. Preservation of the myocardium during coronary artery bypass grafting. Circulation, 1981, 64(Suppl. II), II61–II66.Google ScholarPubMed
4.Bourassa, M. G., Fisher, L. D., Campeau, L., et al. Long-term fate of bypass grafts: The Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) and Montreal Heart Institute experiences. Circulation, 1985, 72(Suppl. V), V71–V78.Google Scholar
5.CASS Principal Investigators and Their Associates. Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS): A randomized trial of coronary artery bypass surgery. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 1984, 3, 114–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.CASS Principal Investigators and Their Associates. Myocardial infarction and mortality in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) randomized trial. New England Journal of Medicine, 1984, 310, 750–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.CASS Principal Investigators and Their Associates. Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS): A randomized trial of coronary artery bypass surgery, survival data. Circulation, 1983, 68, 939–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.CASS Principal Investigators and Their Associates. Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS): A randomized trial of coronary artery bypass surgery. Quality of life in patients randomly assigned to treatment groups. Pathophysiology and Natural History, 1083, 68, 951–60.Google Scholar
9.Chaitman, B. R., Fisher, L. D., Bourassa, M. G., et al. Effect of coronary bypass surgery on survival patterns in subsets of patients with left main coronary artery disease. American Journal of Cardiology, 1981, 48, 765–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Davis, K. B., Fisher, L., Gillespie, M. J., & Pettinger, M.A test of the national death index using the coronary artery surgery study (CASS). Controlled Clinical Trials, 1985, 6, 179–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Davis, K., Kennedy, J. W., Kemp, H. G., et al. Complications of coronary arteriography from the collaborative study of coronary artery surgery (CASS). Circulation, 1979, 59, 1105–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Falotico-Taylor, J., McCIellan, M., & Mosteller, F.The use of quality-of-life measures in technology assessment. In Mosteller, F. & Falotico-Taylor, J. (eds.), Quality of life and technology assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1989, 7–44.Google Scholar
13.Faxon, D. P., Detre, K. M., McCabe, C. H., et al. Role of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in the treatment of unstable angina. American Journal of Cardiology, 1984, 53, 131C–35C.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Faxon, D. P., Ryan, T. J., Davis, K. B., et al. Prognostic significance of angiographically documented left ventricular aneurysm from the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS). American Journal of Cardiology, 1982, 50, 157–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Fisher, L. D., Kennedy, J. W., Chaitman, B. R., et al. Diagnostic quantifications of CASS (Coronary Artery Surgery Study) clinical and exercise test results in determining presence and extent of coronary artery disease, a multivariate approach. Circulation, 1981, 63, 987–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Foster, E. D., Fisher, L. D., Kaiser, G. C., et al. Comparison of operative mortality and morbidity for initial and repeat coronary artery bypass grafting: The coronary artery surgery study (CASS) registry experience. Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1984, 38, 563–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Gersh, B. J., Kronmal, R. A., Schaff, H. V., et al. Comparison of coronary artery bypass surgery and medical therapy in patients 65 years of age or older: A nonrandomized study from the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) Registry. New England Journal of Medicine, 1985, 313, 217–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Gunnar, R. M., & Loeb, H. S.Are the CASS statisticians answering a question no clinician is asking? American Heart Journal, 1986, 111, 1016–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Holmes, D. R., Vlietstra, R. E., Fisher, L. D., et al. Follow-up of patients from the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) potentially suitable for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. American Heart Journal, 1983, 106, 981–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.Kaiser, G. C., Davis, K. B., Fisher, L. D., et al. Survival following coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with severe angina pectoris (CASS): An observational study. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1985, 89, 513–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Kennedy, J. W., Killip, T., Fisher, L. D., et al. The clinical spectrum of coronary artery disease and its surgical and medical management, 1974–1979, the Coronary Artery Surgery Study. Circulation, 1982, 66, III16–III23.Google ScholarPubMed
22.Killip, T., Passamani, E., Davis, K., & CASS Principal Investigators. Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS): A randomized trial of coronary bypass surgery, eight years follow-up and survival in patients with reduced ejection fraction. Circulation, 1985, 72(Suppl. V), V102–V109.Google Scholar
23.Maynard, C., Fisher, L., Alderman, E. L., et al. Institutional differences in therapeutic decision making in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS). Medical Decision Making, 1986, 6, 127–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24.Myers, W. O., Gersh, B. J., Fisher, L. D., et al. Medical versus early surgical therapy in patients with triple-vessel disease and mild angina pectoris: A CASS registry study of survival. Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1987, 44, 471–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25.Myers, W. O., Gersh, B. J., Fisher, L. D., et al. Time to first new myocardial infarction in patients with mild angina and three-vessel disease comparing medicine and early surgery: A CASS registry study of survival. Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1987, 43, 599–612.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26.Myers, W. O., Davis, K., Foster, E. D., et al. Surgical survival in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) Registry. Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1985, 40, 245–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27.Passamani, E., Davis, K. B., Gillespie, M. J., et al. A randomized trial of coronary artery bypass surgery: Survival of patients with a low ejection fraction. New England Journal of Medicine, 1985, 312, 1665–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28.Ryan, T. J., Bailey, K. R., McCabe, C. H., et al. The effects of digitalis on survival in high-risk patients with coronary artery disease, the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS). Circulation, 1983, 67, 735–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29.Scheidt, S.Ischemic heart disease: A patient specific therapeutic approach with emphasis on quality of life considerations. American Heart Journal, 1987, 114, 251–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30.Weiner, D. A., Ryan, T. J., McCabe, C. H., et al. Value of exercise testing in determining the risk classification and the response to coronary artery bypass grafting in three-vessel coronary artery disease: A report from the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) Registry. American Journal of Cardiology, 1987, 60, 262–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31.Weiner, D. A., Ryan, T. J., McCabe, C. H., et al. Exercise stress testing: Correlations among history of angina, ST-segment response and prevalence of coronary artery disease in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS). New England Journal of Medicine, 1979, 301, 230–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32.Weinstein, G. S., & Levin, B. L.The Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS): A critical appraisal. Journal of Thoracic Surgery, 1985, 90, 541–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed