Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-c75p9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-30T15:27:02.895Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Assessing the Effectiveness of Ambulatory Cardiac Monitoring for Specific Clinical Indications: Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

Miriam E. Adams ,
Alexia Antczak-Bouckoms ,
Howard S. Frazier ,
Joseph Lau ,
Thomas C. Chalmers  and
Frederick Mosteller
Miriam E. Adams
Affiliation:
Harvard School of Public Health
Alexia Antczak-Bouckoms
Affiliation:
Harvard School of Public Health
Howard S. Frazier
Affiliation:
Harvard School of Public Health
Joseph Lau
Affiliation:
Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center
Thomas C. Chalmers
Affiliation:
Harvard School of Public Health
Frederick Mosteller
Affiliation:
Harvard School of Public Health
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This introduction and the three essays that follow it examine ambulatory cardiac monitoring for specific clinical indications. They also examine the ways in which evidence from the literature may be synthesized through the framework of decision analysis to guide its appropriate use and identify areas in which more research is needed. The essays discuss ambulatory cardiac monitoring for evaluation of syncope in the elderly; detection of silent ischemia after a myocardial infarction; and selection of antiarrhythmic drugs for malignant ventricular arrhythmias.

Information

Type
General Essays
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , Winter 1993 , pp. 97 - 101
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1.American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Assessment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Cardiovascular Procedures (Subcommittee on Ambulatory Electrocardiography). Guidelines for ambulatory electrocardiography. Circulation, 1989, 79, 206–15.Google Scholar
2.American College of Physicians. Ambulatory electrocardiographic (Holter) monitoring. Annals of Internal Medicine, 1990, 113, 77–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Cumbee, S. R., Pryor, R. E., & Linzer, M.Cardiac Loop ECG Recording: A new noninvasive diagnostic test in recurrent syncope. Southern Medical Journal, 1990, 83, 39–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Handelsman, H. Public Health Service Assessment: Real-time cardiac monitors, 1989. Health Technology Assessment Reports, No. 4. Washington, DC: National Center for Health Services Research and Health Care Technology Assessment, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service.Google Scholar
5.Holter, N. J.New method for heart studies. Science, 1961, 134, 1214–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Linzer, M., Pritchett, E. L. C., Pontinen, M., & McCarthy, E.Incremental diagnostic yield of Loop Electrocardiographic Recorders in unexplained syncope. American Journal of Cardiology, 1990, 66, 214–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed