Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-lqqdg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-20T04:56:51.589Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Agreements and Disagreements between Theories of Rigid Earth Nutation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

J. Souchay
J. Souchay*
Affiliation:
Observatoire de Paris Paris, France

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The necessity to elaborate a theory of nutation and precession matching the accuracy of very modern techniques as Very Long Baseline Interferometry and Lunar Laser Ranging led recently to various works. We discuss here the good agreement between those related to the nutation when considering the Earth as a solid body. In comparison we show the uncertainty concerning the modelisation of the transfer function leading to theoretical determination of the nutation coefficients when including dominant geophysical characteristics.

Information

Type
Rotation of Solar System Objects
Information
International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 165: Dynamics and Astrometry of Natural and Artificial Celestial Bodies , 1997 , pp. 319 - 324
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1997

References

Bretagnon, P., Rocher, P., and Simon, J.L.: 1996, Astron. Astrophys., submitted.Google Scholar
Bretagnon, P. and Francou, G.: 1988, Astron. Astrophys. 202, 309.Google Scholar
Chapront-Touzé, M. and Chapront, J.: 1988, Astron. Astrophys. 190, 342.Google Scholar
Hartmann, T. and Wenzel, H.G.: 1995, Geophys. Res. Lett. 22, 3553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartmann, T., Williams, J.W. and Soffel, M.: 1996, Astron. J. 111, 1400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartmann, T. and Soffel, M.: 1996, Celest. Mech., in press.Google Scholar
Kinoshita, H.: 1972, Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn. 24, 423.Google Scholar
Kinoshita, H.: 1977, Celest. Mech. 26, 296.Google Scholar
Kinoshita, H. and Souchay, J.: 1990, Celest. Mech. 48, 187.Google Scholar
Lieske, J.H., Lederle, T., Fricke, W. and Morando, B.: 1977, Astron. Astrophys. 58, 1.Google Scholar
Souchay, J. and Kinoshita, H.: 1996, Astron. Astrophys. 190, 312, 1017.Google Scholar
Souchay, J. and Kinoshita, H.: 1996, Astron. Astrophys., in press.Google Scholar
Souchay, J., Feissel, M., Bizouard, C., Capitaine, N. and Bougeard, M.: 1995, Astron. Astrophys. 299, 277.Google Scholar
Souchay, J., Feissel, M. and Ma, C.: 1996, Astron. Astrophys., Suppl. Ser. 116, 473.Google Scholar
Roosbeek, F. and Dehant, V.: 1996, Celest. Mech., in press.Google Scholar
Seidelmann, P.K.: 1982, Celest. Mech. 27, 79.Google Scholar
Wahr, J.M.: 1979, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado.Google Scholar
Williams, J.G.: 1994, Astron. J. 108, 711.Google Scholar
Williams, J.G.: 1995, Astron. J. 110, 1420.Google Scholar
Woolard, E.W.: 1953, Astron. Papers for the American Ephemeris and Nautical Almanac XVI, U.S. Gov. Print. Office, Washington.Google Scholar