Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-5kfdg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-29T18:29:46.034Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Victimisation, Médiation et Pratiques Orientées Vers la Réparation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2025

Tony Peters
Tony Peters*
Affiliation:
l’Université de Louvain (K.U.Leuven)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
International Annals of Criminology , Volume 38 , Issue 1-2 , 2000 , pp. 135 - 175
Copyright
Copyright © 2000 International Society for Criminology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

(*)

La version néerlandaise de ce texte est : PETERS, T., « Slachtofferschap, bemiddeling en herstelgerichte praktijken », in Krachten voor de toekomst, Lessen voor de eenentwintigste eeuw, B. Raeymaekers en A. Van de Putte (eds), UPL, Davidsfonds Leuven, 2000, pp. 332366.

References

Bibliographie

Aertsen, L, «Mediation bei schweren Straftaten - auf dem Weg zu einer neuen Rechtskultur ?», in Mediationsverfahren: Horizonte, Grenzen, Innensichten (Jahrbuch für Rechts- und Kriminalsoziologie), Pelikan, C. (ed.), Baden-Baden, Nomos Verl.-Ges., 1999, 115–138.Google Scholar
Aertsen, I. and Peters, T., «Mediation for Reparation: The Victim’s Perspective», European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, vol. 6/2, 1998, 106–124.Google Scholar
Amir, M., «Patterns of forcible rape», Chicago, III. University of Chicago Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Amir, M., «Victim Precipitated Forcible Rape», Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology and Police Science, 1967, 4, 493–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ash, M., «On Wittnesses: A Radical Critique of Criminal Court Procedures», Notre Dame Lawyer, 1972, 48, 386–425.Google Scholar
Bazemore, G. and Walgrave, L., «Restorative Juvenile Justice: In Search of Fundamentals and an Outline for Systemic Reform», in: Bazemore, G. and Walgrave, L. (eds.), Restorative Juvenile Justice: Repairing the Harm of Youth Crime, Monsey, Criminal Justice Press, 1999, 45–74.Google Scholar
Cast an, N. and Y., «Beroep op, behoefte aan en gevoel voor recht tege-nover de officiële rechtspleging gedurende de 18e eeuw in Frank- rijk», Tijdschrift voor Criminologie, 1978, 121–132.Google Scholar
Clark, L., and Lewis, D., «Rape: the Price of Coercive Sexuality», Toronto Women s Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Dignan, J. and Cavadino, M., «Towards a Framework for Conceptualising and Evaluating Models of Criminal Justice from a Victim’s Perspective», International Review of Victimology, 1996, Vol. 4, 153–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunkel, F., Krainz, K. en Wurger, M., «Victimization and Incidence of Delinquency, an International Comparison», in Kaiser, G., Kury, H., Albrecht, H.J., (eds.), Victims and Criminal Justice, Freiburg, 1991, 883–929.Google Scholar
Dünkel, F., «Täter-Opfer Ausgleich. German experiences with mediation in a European perspective», European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 1996, n 4.4., 44–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellenberger, H., «Relations Psychologiques entre le Criminel et sa Victime», Revue Internationale de Criminologie et de Police Technique, 2, 1954, 1 a.f.Google Scholar
Fattah, E., «Some Recent Theoretical Developments in Victimology», Victimology, 1979, 4, 2, 198–213.Google Scholar
Fattah, E., «Victims and Victimology: The Facts and the Rhetoric», International Review of Victimology, 1989, 1: 43–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fattah, E., «The United Nations Declaration of Basic Principles of Justice for Victims of Crime and Abuse of Power», in: Fattah, E. (ed.), Towards a Critical Victimology, London, MacMillan, 1992, 401–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fattah, E., «Restorative and Retributive Justice Models - A Comparison», in: Kühne, H. (ed.), Festschrift für Koichi Miyazawa, BadenBaden, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 1995, 305–315.Google Scholar
Fattah, E. and Peters, T., Support for Crime Victims in a Comparative Perspective. A Collection of Essays Dedicated to the Memory of Prof Frederic McClintock, Leuven, Leuven University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Gala way, B. and Hudson, (eds.), Perspectives on Crime Victims. St. Louis: C.V. Mosby, 1981.Google Scholar
Garafalo, J., «Victimization and the Fear of Crime», Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 1979, 16: 80–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia-Pablos, A., Manual de Criminologia, Espasa Calpe, Madrid, 1988.Google Scholar
Garcia-Pablos de Molina, A., «La Víctima del Delito», 22 p., a non-published note.Google Scholar
Geis, G., Crime Victims: practices and prospects, in Lurigio et.al. (eds.), 1990, 251–268.Google Scholar
Griffiths, C. and Belleau, C., «Restoration, Reconciliation and Healing: the Revitalization of Culture and Tradition in Addressing Crime and Victimization in Canadian Aboriginal Communities», in Fattah, E. and Peters, T., Support of Crime Victims in a Comparative Perspective, Leuven University Press, 1998, 169–188.Google Scholar
Hindelang, M., Gottfredson, M. R., and Garafalo, J., Victims of Personal Crime: An Empirical Foundation for a Theory of Personal Victimization, Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger, 1978.Google Scholar
Hough, M., Taking Account of Crime: Key Findings from the Second British Crime Survey, London: HMSO, 1985.Google Scholar
Johnson, J., a.o., «The Recidivist Victim: a Descriptive Study», Criminal Justice Monographs, Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, Texas, 1973.Google Scholar
Lind, B., «A Study of Injured Victims of Violence in Oslo», Norway (manuscript) 1970.Google Scholar
Lurigio, A.J. and Resick, P.A., «Healing the psychological wounds of criminal victimization: predicting posterime distress and recovery», in Lurigio, A.J., Skogan, W.G. and Davis, R.C. (eds.), Victims of crime: Problems, Policies and Programs, Newbury Park, C.A.: Sage, 1990.Google Scholar
Maguire, M., «The Impact of Burglary upon Victims», British Journal of Criminology, 1980, 20, 3: 261–75.Google Scholar
Maguire, Μ., Corbett, C., The Effects of Crime and the Work of Victim Support Schemes, Aldershot: Gower, 1987.Google Scholar
Marshall, T., Restorative Justice. An overview, London, Home Office, 1999.Google Scholar
Martin, D., «Le Mouvement d’Aide aux Victimes en Belgique Francophone: Tendances, Problèmes Actuels et Perspectives», Revue de Droit Pénal et de Criminologie, 1989, 787–807.Google Scholar
Mawby, R. L, and Gill, M.L., Crime Victims: Needs, Services and the Voluntary Sector, London: Tavistock, 1987.Google Scholar
Mawby, R.I., and Walklate, S., Critical Victimology, London: Sage, 1994.Google Scholar
Mayhew, P., and Aye Maung, N., Elliot, D., and Dowds, L., The 1988 British Crime Survey, London: HMSO, 1989.Google Scholar
Mayhew, P., and Aye Maung, N., «Surveying Crime: Findings from the 1992 British Crime Survey», HORS Research Findings No. 2, London: HMSO, 1992.Google Scholar
Mayhew, P., and Aye Maung, N., Mirrlees-Black, C., «Trends in Crime: Findings from the 1994 British Crime Survey», HORS Research Findings No. 14, London: HMSO, 1994.Google Scholar
Maxfield, M.G., Fear of Crime in England and Wales, HORS 78, London: HMSO, 1984.Google Scholar
McCold, P., «Restorative Justice - Variations on a Theme», in: Walgrave, L. (ed.), Restorative Justice for Juveniles. Potentialities, Risks and Problems, Leuven, Leuven University Press, 1998, 19–53.Google Scholar
Mendelsohn, B., «Une nouvelle branche de la science bio-psychosociale: la victimologie», in Revue Internationale de Criminologie et de Police Technique 1956, 11 (2), 95–109.Google Scholar
Mirrlees-Black, C., Mayhew, P. and Percy, A., The 1996 British Crime Survey. London, HMSO, 1996.Google Scholar
Peters, T., «Probleemoplossing en herstel als functies van de straf», Panopticon, 1996, 555–569.Google Scholar
Peters, T. en Goethals, J. (eds.), De achterkant van de criminaliteit. Over victimologie, slachtofferhulp en strafrechtsbedeling, Antwerpen: Kluwer Rechtswetenschappen België, 1993.Google Scholar
Phipps, A., Criminal victimisation, Crime Control and and Political Action, Middlesex Polytechnic (Ph.D. thesis), 1987, 604 p.Google Scholar
Reeves, H., «The victim support perspective», in: Wright, Μ. en Gala way, B. (eds.), Mediation and criminal justice: victims, offenders and community, London: Sage, 1989: 44–55.Google Scholar
Consortium, Restorative Justice, Standards for Restorative Justice, London, National Council for Social Concern, 1998.Google Scholar
Roberts, S., Order and Dispute. An Introduction to Legal Antropology, Middlesex, Penguin, 1979.Google Scholar
Rock, P., «Helping Victims of Crime. The Home Office and the Rise of Victim Support in England and Wales», Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1990, 442p.Google Scholar
Savitz, L., Lalli, M. and Rosen, , «City Life and Delinquency Victimization, Fear of Crime and Gang Membership», U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington D.C., 1977.Google Scholar
Singer, S., «Slachtoffers van ernstige Vermögensen geweldsmisdrij- ven», Deel 1, De materiek problematiek, Groningen, 1977.Google Scholar
Skogan, W.G., «The Fear of Crime and its Behavioural Implications», in Fattah, E., (ed.), From Crime Policy to Victim Policy, London: Macmillan, 1986.Google Scholar
Skogan, W.G., «The Impact of Victimization on Fear», Crime and Delinquency, 1986, 33: 135–54.Google Scholar
Smaele, S., «Homogeneous Victim-Offender Populations: A Review and some Research Implications.» The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 1981, 72 (2), 779–788.Google Scholar
Sparks, R., Genn, H.G. and Dodd, D.J., Surveying Victims: A study of the measurement of criminal victimization, London, John Wiley and Son, 1977.Google Scholar
Stańko, E.A., «Hidden Violence Against Women», in Maguire, M. and Pointing, J., (eds.), Victims of Crime: A New Deal?, Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, J.J.M., «L’évaluation de l’impact des régimes d’indemnisation et des programmes d’assistance aux victimes d’infraction», Annales de Droit de Liège, 1984, 211–216.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, J.J.M., «Strafrechtshervormingen ten behoeve van het slachtoffer in internationaal perspectief», Justitiële Verkenningen, 1988, 727.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, J.J.M., «Eigen schuld, dikke bult? Over de neiging om het slachtoffer verantwoordelijk te stellen voor zijn/haar lot», Soeten-horst-De Savonin Holman J., (red.) Slachtoffers van misdrijven. Ontwikkelingen in hulpverlening, recht en beleid, Gouda Quint, Arnhem, 1989, 11–24.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, J.J.M., Mayhew, P. and Killias, M., Experiences of Crime Across the World: Key Findings of the 1989 International Crime Survey, Arnhem, Kluwer, 1990.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, J J.Μ., «Victimologie», Tijdschrift voor Criminologie, 1992, 65–69.Google Scholar
Van Kerckvoorde, J., «Slachtofferenquêtes», Handboek Politiediensten, IX, E/3, 1986, 1–17.Google Scholar
Van Kerckvoorde, J., Een maat voor het kwaadl, Universitaire Pers Leuven, 1995.Google Scholar
Van Ness, D., «Legal Issues of Restorative Justice», in: Bazemore, G. and Walgrave, L. (eds.), Restorative Juvenile Justice: Repairing the Harm of Youth Crime, Monsey, Criminal Justice Press, 1999, 263284.Google Scholar
Verstraeten, R., «De burgerlijke partij in het gerechtelijk onderzoek. Het slachtoffer in het strafproces», Maklu Uitgevers, Antwerpen/Apeldoorn, 1990, 534.Google Scholar
Viano, E., «Victimology: A new focus of research and practice», Victim’s rights and legal reforms, Oñati Proceedings 9, Oñati, 1991.Google Scholar
Von Hentig, H., «Remarks on the interaction of Perpetrator and Victim», Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 1941, 31 (3), 303309.Google Scholar
Von Hentig, H., The Criminal and his Victim, New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1948.Google Scholar
Walgrave, L., «Restorative justice for juveniles: just a technique or a fully-fledged alternative ?», The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 1995, 228–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weitekamp, E., The paradigm of restorative justice: potentials, possibilities and pitfalls. Keynote lecture for the 9th International Symposium on Victimology (unpublished), Amsterdam, 1997.Google Scholar
Weiss, K., Borges, S., «Victimology and rape: the case of the legitimate victim», Issues in Criminology, 1973, 8, 71–115.Google Scholar
Wergens, A., Crime Victims in the European Union, Umeå, The Crime Victim Compensation and Support Authority, 1999.Google Scholar
Wolfgang, M., Patterns in Criminal Homicide, Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, 1958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, M., Justice for victims and offenders. A restorative response to crime (second edition), Winchester, Waterside Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Young, M., Restorative Community Justice: a call to action, Washington, National Organization for Victim Assistance, 1996.Google Scholar
Zauberman, and Robert, P., Du côté des victimes: un autre regard sur la délinquance, 1995, L’Harmattan Paris.Google Scholar
Zedner, L., «Reparation in Criminal Law», in Eser, A. and Walther, S., (eds.), Wiedergutmachung im Kriminalrecht: Internationale Perspektiven, 1996, 109–227, Freiburg: Max Planck Institute.Google Scholar
Zedner, L., «Victims», in The Oxford Handbook of Criminology, 2nd ed., 577–612.Google Scholar
Zehr, H., Changing Lenses: A new focus for criminal justice, Scottdale, Herald Press, 1990.Google Scholar