Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-hn9fh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-30T13:24:03.186Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Police and Minorities in England

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2025

Gary T. Marx  and
Mary Morton
Gary T. Marx
Affiliation:
Department of Urban Studies and Planning, M.IT. Cambridge, Mass Department of Sociology, University of California, Lajolla, California - U.S.A
Mary Morton
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, Queens University, Kingston, Ontario - Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Police anywhere are problematic as a public institution for a variety of reasons, such as their authoritarian and adversarial role, the fact that they can legally use force, the opportunities for corruption they are offered, lack of agreement over the morality they enforce, and the fact that they must act quickly in situations where only limited information is available.

The English police are of interest in this regard because they occupy a rather unique position in appearing to be more loved than hated, something that can hardly be said for police in most other countries. The degree of consensus and voluntary compliance with law, though easily exaggerated by the anglophilic American, seem more pronounced than in most other countries.

Information

Type
IV. — Micro-Criminology
Information
International Annals of Criminology , Volume 17 , Issue 1-2 , 1978 , pp. 167 - 188
Copyright
Copyright © 1978 International Society for Criminology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

References:

BANTON, (M.): The Policeman in the Community, Basic Books. New York. 1964. Police Community Relations, Collins, London, 1973.Google Scholar
BAYLEY, (D.H.) and MENDELSOHN, (H.): Minorities and the Police: Confrontation in America, Free Press, New York. 1968.Google Scholar
BERCAL, (T.F.): «Calls for Police Assistance: Consumer Demands for Governmental Service», in Hahn, Harlan (ed.) Police in Urban Society, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, California, pp. 267–278.Google Scholar
BLOCK, (R.L.): «Fear of Crime and Fear of the Police», Social Problems, Summer 1971, pp. 91–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BOURMA, (D.): «Youth Attitudes Toward the Police and Law Enforcement», in Curran, J. et al. (eds), Police and Law Enforcement, A.M.S. Press, New York. 1972, pp. 219–238.Google Scholar
COIN, (M.E.): Society and the Policeman's Role, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1973.Google Scholar
CUNNING, (E.) et al.: «Policeman as Philosopher, Guide and Friend», Social Problems, n° 12, Winter 1965, pp. 276–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HUMPHREY, : Police Power and Black People, Panther Books, London, 1972.Google Scholar
LAMBERT, (J.): Crime, Police, Race Relations, Oxford University Press, London.Google Scholar
PERRY, (D.C.): Police in the Metropolis, C. Merrill, Colombus, Ohio, 1975.Google Scholar
REISS, (A.J. jr.): «Public Perceptions and Recollections About Crime, Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice», Vol. 1, Field Surveys III, Studies in Crime and Law Enforcement in Major Metropolitan Areas, Presidents' Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice, Washington D.C., 1967.Google Scholar
SILVER, (A.): «The Demand for Order in Civil Society», in Bordua, D. (ed.), The Police, John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp. 1–24.Google Scholar