Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-mnl9s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-03T00:16:10.097Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Economic Development and Crime: A Case of Burglary

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2025

Satyanshu K. Mukherjee*
Affiliation:
Australian Institute of Criminology

Abstract

Using longitudinal data, the paper examines the relationships between economic conditions and crime in Australia. The gross domestic product per capita and the unemployment rate have been used as the two indicators of the economy, and offences charged before magistrate's courts and burglaries reported to police, were used as indicators of crimes. The analysis, both of major categories of offences and burglary, show that different periods in the present century have had a varied impact on types of crimes. A major finding suggests that property crimes increase sharply in situations when the economy received a major set back like the great Depression, as well as when it is growing at a very fast rate. Also the study reveals that the increase in burglaries is closely linked with the growth in the economy and the production of, and accessibility to ever increasing consumer goods, have led to a shift in the targets of burglary, both in terms of the types of premises broken into and kinds of goods stolen. And finally, the burglary data for the present century do not show the existence of any cycles or regularities, nor does the present data show any lags.

Résumé

Résumé

A partir de données longitudinales cet article examine les relations de cause à effet entre condition économique et criminalité en Australie. Le pouvoir d'achat brut par habitant et le taux de chômage ont été utilisés comme indicateurs du niveau économique, le nombre de délits faisant l'objet d'une audience devant le tribunal ainsi que les cambriolages déclarés à la police ont quant à eux servis d'indicateurs de la criminalité. L'analyse, pour les catégories principales de délits et de cambriolages, montre que les différentes époques de notre siècle ont eu un impact variable selon les types de crime. L'un des principaux résultats de l'étude montre que les crimes contre la propriété augmentent brusquement aussi bien dans les périodes où le niveau économique est sévèrement touché, comme par exemple pendant la grande Dépression, que lorsque celui-ci connaît un accroissement rapide. L'étude révèle également que l'augmentation des cambriolages est étroitement liée à la croissance de l'économie et production et accessibilité de biens de consommation sans cesse plus nombreux, ont conduit à un changement dans les mobiles des cambriolages à la fois quant aux types de lieux fracturés et quant aux types de biens dérobés.

En conclusion, les statistiques sur les cambriolages pour le 20ème siècle ne révèlent aucun cycle ou période répétitive ni même aucun décalage.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1986 International Society for Criminology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

BRENNER, M. Harvey (1976), Estimating the Social Costs of National Economic Policy: Implications for Mental and Physical Health, and Criminal Aggression, study prepared for the use of the Joint Economic Committee, Congress of the United States, Paper N° 5, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
CLARKE, Ronald V. (1984), “Opportunity-based Criminal Rates”, British Journal of Criminology, 24: 7483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CLOWARD, Richard A. and Ohlin, LLOYD E., (1960), Delinquency and Opportunity. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
FLEISHER, Belton M. (1966), The Economics of Delinquency Chicago: Quadrangle Books.Google Scholar
FOX, James A. (1978), Forecasting Crime Data: An Econometric Analysis. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
MAGUIRE, Mike, (1982), Burglary in a Dwelling. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
MUKHERJEE, Satyanshu K. (1981), Crime Trends in Twentieth Century Australia. Sydney: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
MUKHERJEE, Satyanshu K., forthcoming (1985), Burglary in a City. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.Google Scholar
MUKHERJEE, Satyanshu K., Walker, John R. and Jacobsen, Evelyn N., Crime in the Colonies (Historical Statistics Monograph) Sydney: Australia 1788 — 1988: A Bicentennial History, University of New South Wales, forthcoming 1985).Google Scholar
SCARR, Harvey A. (1973), Patterns of Burglary. Washington, D.C: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
SELLIN, Thorsten, (1937), Research Memorandum on Crime in the Depression. New York: Social Science Research Council.Google Scholar
SPARKS, Richard F., Genn, Hazel G. and Dodd, David J., (1977), Surveying Victims: A Study of the Measurement of Criminal Victimization. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
THORNBERRY, Terence P. and Christenson, R.L., (1984), “Unemployment and Criminal Involvement: An Investigation of Reciprocal Causal Structures”, American Sociological Review, 49: 398411.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed