Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-65tv2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-06T21:55:11.882Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Critique of Institutional Care

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2025

P. Clairmonte*
Affiliation:
Behavioural Sciences Research Programme, Department of Psychiatry and Neurology, University of Ibadan

Extract

There is a widespread mythology in liberal circles in Britain and America that treatment oriented regimes are the key to the problem of the control of crime and delinquency. (Studies of treatment regimes, use the word treatment to contrast with discipline, custody, etc.: and it is in this sense that I shall use it). Studies of these regimes have done nothing to destroy this myth and are often taken to support it. These studies invariably show that staff and inmates under treatment regimes are more friendly to each other, talk freely to each other, indeed that the whole atmosphere of the institution is more relaxed and congenial. Because of this, it seems to be assumed without any empirical justification, that by some mystical process of spontaneous combustion, the inmates are more available to the influence of staff values. Unfortunately for therapeutic mystification however what the hard evidence suggests, as I shall show, is that inmates are merely temporarily making the most of more pleasant conditions. Their basic attitudes remain unaffected.

Information

Type
Premiere Partie: XXth International Course in Criminology
Copyright
Copyright © 1971 International Society for Criminology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bibliography

Street, Vinter and Perrow, (1966), Organization for Treatment.Google Scholar
Clemmer, (D.) (1940), The Prison Community.Google Scholar
Sykes, (G.-M.) (1958), The Society of Captives.Google Scholar
Mathiesen, (T.) (1965), The Defences of the Weak.Google Scholar
Mathiesen, (T.) (1966), The Sociology of Prisons: Problems for future Research in Brit., J. Sociology, 17, 360379.Google Scholar
Johson, (W.) et al (1962), The Sociology of Punishment and Correction.Google Scholar
Glaser, (1964), The effectiveness of a prison and parole system.Google Scholar
Irwin, and Gressey, (1964), Thieves, Convicts and the Inmate Culture, in Becker, (H.-S.) (ed) The Other Side, 225245.Google Scholar
Cressey (D.-R.), (ed) (1961), The Prison: Studies in Institutional Organisation and Change.Google Scholar
Spencer, (J.-C.) (1965), Problems in Transition : From Prison to Therapeutic Community in Halmos, (P.) (ed), Sociological.Google Scholar
Berk, (D.), Organisational Goals and Inmate Treatment.Google Scholar
Erikson, (K.-T.) (1964), Notes on the Sociology of Deviance in Becker, (H.) (ed), The Other Side, 921.Google Scholar
Polsky, , Cottage Six.Google Scholar
Berk, (D.), Organisational Goals and Inmate Treatment.Google Scholar
Erikson, (K.-T.) (1964), Notes on the Sociology of Deviance in Becker, (H.) (ed), The Other Side, 921.Google Scholar
Polsky, , Cottage Six.Google Scholar