Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-hn9fh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-25T21:43:05.234Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Repercussions of incivility and hostile expressions in academia: A legal perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 January 2020

Sharona Aharoni-Goldenberg ,
Aharon Tziner  and
Dana Barnett
Sharona Aharoni-Goldenberg
Affiliation:
Netanya Law School, Netanya Academic College
Aharon Tziner*
Affiliation:
School of Business Administration, Netanya Academic College, and Peres Academic Center;
Dana Barnett
Affiliation:
Israel Academia Monitor
*
*Corresponding author. Email: aetziner@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 12 , Issue 4 , December 2019 , pp. 385 - 390
Copyright
© Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Anderson, L. M., & Pearson, C. M. (1999). Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace. Academy of Management Review , 33, 55–75.Google Scholar
Connick v. Myers, 461 U.S. 138 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cortina, L. M., Cortina, M. G., & Cortina, M. J. (2019). Regulating rude: Tensions between free speech and civility in academic employment. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 12(4), 357–375.Google Scholar
Cortina, L. M., Kabat-Farr, D., Leskinen, E., Huerta, M., & Magley, V. (2013). Selective incivility as modern discrimination: Evidence of impact in organizations. Journal of Management , 39, 1579–1605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cortina, L. M., Magley, V. J., Williams, J. H., & Langhout, R. D. (2001). Incivility in the workplace: Incidence and impact. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology , 6, 64–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Demers v. Austin, 746 F.3d 402 (9th Cir. Wash. Jan. 29, 2014).Google Scholar
Garcetti v. Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410 (2006).Google Scholar
Gorum v. Sessoms, 561 F.3d 179 (3rd Cir. 2009).Google Scholar
Hoofnagle, C. (2001). Matters of public concern and the public university professor. Journal of College and University Law , 27, 669–707.Google Scholar
Jackson, J., & Stafford, M. (2009). Public health and fear of crime: A prospective cohort study. British Journal of Criminology , 49, 832–847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeffries v. Harleston, 52 F.3d 9 (1995).Google Scholar
Lee, M., Kim, H., Shin, D., & Lee, S. (2016). Reliability and validity of the workplace harassment questionnaire for Korean finance and service workers. Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 28, 45–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, J., & Lim, J. J. (2019). Workplace bullying and job attitudes: The moderating role of coping strategies. International Journal of Business and Information , 14, 1–24.Google Scholar
Lipinski, J., & Crothers, J. M. (Eds.). (2013). Bullying in the workplace: Causes, symptoms, and remedies. New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackey, J. D., Bishoff, J. D., Daniels, S. R., Hochwarter, W. A., & Ferris, G. R. (2019). Incivility’s relationship with workplace outcomes: Enactment as a boundary condition in two samples. Journal of Business Ethics , 155, 513–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin v. Parrish, 805 F.2d 583 (1986)Google Scholar
Pickering v. Board of Education of Township H.S. Dist. 205, Will County, 391 U.S. 563 (1968).Google Scholar
Rankin v. McPherson, 483 U.S. 378 (1987).Google Scholar
Sweezy v. New Hampshire, 354 U.S. 234 (1957).Google Scholar
Waters v. Churchill, 511 U.S. 611 (1994).Google Scholar