No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Politics, policy, and pedagogy: Preparing I-O psychology students amid ongoing policy shifts
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 August 2025
Abstract
The policy shifts the United States is facing as of late are creating a changing landscape for workers and organizations. These policy shifts are also impacting how industrial-organizational (I-O) psychology professors engage with pedagogy and politics in the classroom and training. Our policy brief emphasizes using policy shifts to support skill building around critical thinking and evidence-based decision making, thereby promoting classroom and training environments that empower the next generation. In this article, we discuss these implications and recommendations for I-O professors (including instructors, faculty, and others responsible for teaching and training the next generation of workers and I-O professionals). We call on I-O professors to intentionally engage with policy shifts in the classroom, emphasize evidence-based practice and provide opportunities to develop these skills, and support I-O advocacy. We recognize that these efforts are not without challenge, and we provide recommendations to reduce the burden on I-O professors and students when critically engaging with this content. Finally, we highlight several sources, including Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology (SIOP), that provide information on navigating and understanding the ongoing policy shifts.
Information
- Type
- Focal Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology
References
Banks, G. C., Barnes, C. M., & Jiang, K. (2021). Changing the conversation on the science-practice gap: An adherence-based approach. Journal of Management, 47(6), 1347–1356. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206321993546
CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banks, G. C., Pollack, J. M., Bochantin, J. E., Kirkman, B. L., Whelpley, C. E., & O’Boyle, E. H. (2016). Management’s science-practice gap: A grand challenge for all stakeholders. Academy of Management Journal, 59(6), 2205–2231. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.0728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burris, E. R. (2012). The risks and rewards of speaking up: Managerial responses to employee voice. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 851–875, https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.5465/amj.2010.0562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castille, C. M., Kreamer, L. M., Albritton, B. H., Banks, G. C., & Rogelberg, S. G. (2022). The open science challenge: Adopt one practice that enacts widely shared values. Journal of Business and Psychology, 37(3), 459–467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-022-09806-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Federal Register (n.d.). Executive Orders. https://www.federalregister.gov/presidential-documents/executive-orders.Google Scholar
Garisto, D., Kozlov, M., & Tollefson, J. (2025). What Trump’s flurry of executive orders means for Science. Nature News. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-025-00197-x.Google Scholar
Grandey, A. A. (2000). Emotional regulation in the workplace: A new way to conceptualize emotional labor. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5(1), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.5.1.95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayes, S. C., Pistorello, J., & Levin, M. E. (2012). Acceptance and commitment therapy as a unified model of behavior change. The counseling psychologist, 40(7), 976–1002.10.1177/0011000012460836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
hooks, bell (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. Routledge.Google Scholar
Keener, S. K., Kepes, S., & Torka, A. K. (2023). The trustworthiness of the cumulative knowledge in industrial/organizational psychology: The current state of affairs and a path forward. Acta Psychologica, 239, 104005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.104005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, A. (2025). More than 1,000 international students have had visas or legal status revoked. AP News. https://apnews.com/article/f1-visa-international-college-student-trump-9d4d900d328a0c205503c1178e70f1d5,Google Scholar
Maitlis, S., & Christianson, M. (2014). Sensemaking in organizations: Taking stock and moving forward. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 57–125. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2014.873177
CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mervis, J. (2025). Trump orders cause chaos at science agencies. Science. https://www.science.org/content/article/trump-orders-cause-chaos-science-agencies.Google Scholar
Price, M. L., Megerian, C., & Weissert, W. (2025). Trump’s second week in office delivers jolts and chaotic orders with a mix of politics and tragedy. AP News. https://apnews.com/article/trump-tariffs-dei-federal-workers-plane-crash-733303f2c808834f4cc4b30dfaf308a7.Google Scholar
SHRM (n.d.). Executive order impact zone. Executive Order Impact Zone. https://www.shrm.org/advocacy/executive-order-impact-zone.Google Scholar
Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology (SIOP) ( n.d.). Updates on federal policy. https://www.siop.org/news-center/updates-on-federal-policy/,Google Scholar
Stancy, D., Casiano, L., Ward, P., & News, Fox (2025). Trump to sign executive order to abolish the Department of Education. Fox News. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-sign-executive-order-abolish-department-education.Google Scholar
USA Facts Team (2025). How many executive orders has each president signed? USA Facts. https://usafacts.org/articles/how-many-executive-orders-has-each-president-signed/.Google Scholar
Williams, J. C., Maechtlen, L. J., & Doklas, J. (2025). How to assess the new legal risks of your DEI Ppolicies. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from: https://hbr.org/2025/02/how-to-assess-the-new-legal-risks-of-your-dei-policies.Google Scholar