Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-pvkqz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-27T05:08:37.257Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pacifism and Care

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Victoria Davion
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I argue there is no pacifist commitment implied by the practice of mothering, contrary to what Ruddick suggests. Using violence in certain situations is consistent with the goals of this practice. Furthermore, I use Ruddick's valuable analysis of the care for particular individuals involved in this practice to show why pacifism may be incompatible with caring passionately for individuals. If giving up passionate attach-ments to individuals is necessary for pacifist commitment as Ghandi claims, then the price is too hith.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , Spring 1990 , pp. 90 - 100
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Ghandi, M.K. 1961. Non‐violent resistance. New York: Shocken Books.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In a different voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ruddick, Sara. 1984a. Maternal thinking. In Mothering. Trebilcot, Joyce, ed. New Jersey: Rowman and Allenheld.Google Scholar
Ruddick, Sara. 1984b. Preservative love and military destruction: Some reflections on mothering and peace. In Mothering. Trebilcot, Joyce, ed. New Jersey: Rowman and Allenheld.Google Scholar