Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-mwwwr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-24T19:06:11.037Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Moral “I”: The Feminist Subject and the Grammar of Self-Reference

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Wendy Lee-Lampshire
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Much recent feminist theory tacitly subscribes to some version of what cognitive and evolutionary scientists are successfully undermining as untenably Cartesian, namely, the view that moral agency is achieved through the transcendence of physical causality guaranteed by self-consciousness. Appealing to Wittgenstein's insights concerning self-reference, I argue that abandoning Cartesian dualism implies abandoning neither subject nor moral agency but rather opens up nonandrocentric possibilities unavailable to the traditional model of mind.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , Winter 1992 , pp. 34 - 51
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Alcoff, Linda. 1988. Cultural feminism versus post‐structuralism: The identity crisis in feminist theory. Signs 13 (3): 405–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennett, Daniel C. 1984. Elbow room. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dennett, Daniel C. 1987. The intentional stance. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jaggar, Alison. 1983. Feminist politics and human nature. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allenheld.Google Scholar
Lee‐Lampshire, Wendy. N.d. Marx and the ideology of gender: A paradox of praxis and nature. Critical feminist essays in the history of Western philosophy, ed. Bar On, Bat‐Ami. Albany, NY: SUNY Press. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Nagel, Thomas. 1986. The view from nowhere. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1953. Philosophical investigations. Trans. Anscombe, G. E. M.New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1970. Zettel. Trans. Anscombe, G. E. M.Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1969. On certainty. Trans. Paul, Denis and Anscombe, G. E. M.New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1982. Last writings on the philosophy of psychology, Vol. 1. Trans. Luckhardt, C. G.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar