Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-ff9ft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-03T13:12:29.504Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Construction of ‘Tribe’ as a Socio-Political Unit in Global History

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 May 2024

Elisabeth Leake Open the ORCID record for Elisabeth Leake [Opens in a new window]
Elisabeth Leake*
Affiliation:
The Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA
*
Email: elisabeth.leake@tufts.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article explores the construction of ‘tribe’ as a socio-political unit of global history, revealing an evolution of ideas and practices, both of which actively sought to limit, by co-opting, the opportunities and agency of Indigenous groups. The category of ‘tribe’ was, and is, co-constitutive of Euro-American empire. Euro-American empires created two interlinked dynamics in the social history of the ‘tribe’. One was external, a process of categorization to facilitate and effect conquest and integration. The other was internal, a process of reimagining social relationships through which locals adapted to the threats and opportunities of empire. By mapping British approaches to ethnic Pashtuns and the state of Afghanistan onto imperial engagement with ‘tribal’ communities worldwide – and highlighting both similarities and differences with the North American examples more prominent in the existing literature – global patterns of ‘tribalism’, as defined by Euro-Americans, become apparent. The article illustrates some – but certainly not all – of the impacts of being labelled ‘tribal’ while demonstrating ways that areas and societies seemingly peripheral to each other became interconnected because of shared Euro-American terminology and practice.

Information

Type
Article
Information
The Historical Journal , Volume 67 , Special Issue 4: Global Social History: Class and Social Transformation in World History , September 2024 , pp. 826 - 849
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1 Ahmed, Akbar S., ‘An aspect of the colonial encounter in the North-West Frontier Province’, Asian Affairs, 9 (1978), pp. 319–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Yousaf, Farooq, ‘The “savage” Pathan (Pashtun) and the postcolonial burden’, Critical Studies on Security, 9 (2021), pp. 36–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 On the etymology of ‘tribe’, see ‘tribe, n.’, OED Online (2021); Pagden, Anthony, The fall of natural man: the American Indian and the origins of comparative ethnology (Cambridge, 1982)Google Scholar; Pagden, Anthony, Lords of all the world: ideologies of empire in Spain, Britain, and France, c. 1500 – c. 1850 (New Haven, CT, 1995)Google Scholar; Karen Ordahl Kupperman, ed., America in European consciousness, 1493–1750 (Chapel Hill, NC, 1995).

4 Sneath, David, ‘Tribe’, in The Cambridge encyclopedia of anthropology (Cambridge, 2016)Google Scholar.

5 Coates, Ken, A global history of Indigenous peoples: struggle and survival (New York, NY, 2004), ch. 2CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 Crews, Roberts D., Afghan modern: the history of a global nation (Cambridge, MA, 2015), p. 15Google Scholar; Thomas J. Barfield, ‘The shadow empires: imperial state formation along the Chinese–nomad frontier’, in Susan E. Alcock et al., eds., Empires: perspectives from archaeology and history (Cambridge, 2001). On the Mongols as an empire deriving from a tribal confederation, see Burbank, Jane and Cooper, Frederick, Empires in world history: power and the politics of difference (Princeton, NJ, 2010), pp. 9–10, ch. 4Google Scholar.

7 Van Der Steen, Eveline, Near Eastern tribal societies during the nineteenth century: economy, society and politics between tent and town (London, 2014), pp. 34–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 Karlsson, Bengt G. and Subba, Tanka B., Indigeneity in India (London, 2006), p. 4Google Scholar; Karlsson, Bengt G., ‘Anthropology and the “Indigenous slot”: claims to and debates about Indigenous peoples’ status in India’, Critique of Anthropology, 23 (2003), pp. 403–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar. On indigeneity and ‘retribalization’, see Rata, Elizabeth, ‘The transformation of indigeneity’, Review (Fernand Braudel Center), 25 (2002), pp. 173–95Google Scholar.

9 Richard Waller, ‘Ethnicity and identity’, in John Parker and Richard Reid, eds., The Oxford handbook of modern African history (Oxford, 2013); Lentz, Carola, ‘Colonial construction and African initiatives: the history of ethnicity in northwestern Ghana’, Ethnos, 65 (2000), pp. 112–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Wright, Donald R., ‘“What do you mean there were no tribes in Africa?”: thought on boundaries – and related matters – in precolonial Africa’, History in Africa, 26 (1999), pp. 409–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Berman, Bruce J., ‘Ethnicity, patronage and the African state: the politics of uncivil nationalism’, African Affairs, 97 (1998), pp. 305–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Allman, Jean Marie, ‘The youngmen and the porcupine: class, nationalism, and Asante’s struggle for self-determination’, Journal of African History, 31 (1990), pp. 263–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

10 Francesca Merlan, ‘Indigeneity: global and local’, Current Anthropology, l (2009), pp. 303–33; Shaw, Karena, ‘Indigeneity and the international’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 31 (2002), pp. 55–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Gilbert, Jérémie, ‘Indigenous rights in the making: the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples’, International Journal on Minority Group Rights, 14 (2007), pp. 207–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Engle, Karen, The elusive promise of Indigenous development: rights, culture, strategy (Durham, NC, 2010)Google Scholar. On recent attempts to develop a global Indigenous history, see Ann McGrath and Lynette Russell, eds., The Routledge companion to global Indigenous history (New York, NY, 2022).

11 See, for example, Bodley, John H., Cultural anthropology: tribes, states, and the global system (Mayfield, KY, 1994)Google Scholar; Southall, Aidan, ‘The segmentary state in Africa and Asia’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, 30 (1988), pp. 52–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Barth, Fredrik, Ethnic groups and boundaries: the social organization of culture difference (London, 1969)Google Scholar; Richard Tapper, ed., The conflict of tribe and state in Iran and Afghanistan (London, 1983); Tapper, Richard, ‘What is this thing called “ethnography”?’, Iranian Studies, 31 (1998), pp. 389–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

12 On the rather different relationship between tribal societies and Ottoman imperialism, see Kasaba, Reşat, A moveable empire: Ottoman nomads, migrants, and refugees (Seattle, WA, 2009)Google Scholar.

13 Morton H. Fried, ‘A continent found, a universe lost’, in Stanley Diamond, ed., Theory and practice (New York, NY, 1980). On the shift from ‘nation’ to ‘tribe’ as rhetorical imperialism, see Lyons, Scott Richard, ‘Rhetorical sovereignty: what do American Indians want from writing?’, College Composition and Communication, 51 (2000), pp. 447–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

14 Richter, Daniel K., The ordeal of the longhouse: the peoples of the Iroquois league in the era of European colonization (Chapel Hill, NC, 1992)Google Scholar; Herrmann, Rachel B., No useless mouth: waging war and fighting hunger in the American revolution (Ithaca, NY, 2019), pp. 24–5Google Scholar; Campisi, Jack, ‘The Iroquois and the Euro-American concept of tribe’, New York History, 78 (1997), pp. 455–72Google Scholar; Shoemaker, Nancy, ‘An alliance between men: gender metaphors in eighteenth-century American Indian diplomacy east of the Mississippi’, Ethnohistory, 46 (1999), pp. 239–63Google Scholar.

15 Richter, Ordeal of the longhouse, p. 64.

16 Fried, ‘A continent found’, p. 275.

17 Michael Witgen, ‘American Indians in world history’, in Frederick E. Hoxie, ed., The Oxford handbook of American Indian history (Oxford, 2016), p. 591; Witgen, Michael, ‘The rituals of possession: Native identity and the invention of empire in seventeenth-century western North America’, Ethnohistory, 54 (2007), pp. 639–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Merrell, James H., ‘The Indian’s new world: the Catawba experience’, William and Mary Quarterly, 41 (1984), pp. 537–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Richter, Daniel K., Facing east from Indian country: a Native history of early America (Cambridge, MA, 2001)Google Scholar; White, Richard, The middle ground: Indians, empires, and republics in the Great Lakes Region, 1650–1815 (New York, NY, 1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Herrmann, No useless mouth. More broadly, see Blackhawk, Ned, The rediscovery of America: Native peoples and the unmaking of U.S. history (New Haven, CT, 2023)Google Scholar; Hämäläinen, Pekka, Indigenous continent: the epic contest for North America (New York, NY, 2022)Google Scholar; Dodds-Pennock, Caroline, On savage shores: how Indigenous Americans discovered Europe (London, 2023)Google Scholar.

18 Bemessous, Saliha, ‘Assimilation and racialism in seventeenth and eighteenth-century French colonial policy’, American Historical Review, 110 (2005), pp. 322–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

19 J. A. Brandão and William A. Starna, ‘The treaties of 1701: a triumph of Iroquois diplomacy’, Ethnohistory, 43 (1996), pp. 209–44, at p. 232; Jon Parmenter and Mark Power Robison, ‘The perils and possibilities of wartime neutrality on the edges of empire: Iroquois and Acadians between the French and British in North America, 1744–1760’, Diplomatic History, 31 (2007), pp. 167–206; Jon Parmenter, ‘After the mourning wars: the Iroquois as allies in colonial North American campaigns, 1676–1769’, William and Mary Quarterly, 64 (2007), pp. 39–76.

20 Pekka Hämäläinen, The Comanche empire (New Haven, CT, 2008), p. 47; Herrmann, No useless mouth, p. 44.

21 Fried, ‘A continent found’, p. 276. On persistent terminological ambiguities, see Bell, Duncan, The idea of greater Britain: empire and the future of the world (Princeton, NJ, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

22 Witgen, ‘American Indians in world history’, p. 594.

23 Elizabeth Colson, ‘Political organization in tribal societies: a cross-cultural comparison’, American Indian Quarterly, 10 (1986), pp. 5–19, at p. 6. On tribal sovereignty, ‘tribe’, and ‘nation’, see Cobb, Amanda J., ‘Understanding tribal sovereignty: definitions, conceptualizations, and interpretations’, American Studies, 46 (2005), pp. 115–32Google Scholar.

24 Anghie, Anthony, ‘Finding peripheries: sovereignty and colonialism in nineteenth-century international law’, Harvard International Law Journal, 40 (1999), pp. 1–71Google Scholar.

25 Alyssa Mt. Pleasant, ‘Independence for whom? Expansion and conflict in the northeast and northwest’, in Andrew Shankman, ed., The world of the revolutionary American republic (New York, NY, 2014), p. 127; Christina Snyder, ‘Native nations in the age of revolution’, in ibid.

26 Pitts, Jennifer, A turn to empire: the rise of imperial liberalism in Britain and France (Princeton, NJ, 2005), pp. 127CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 209; Gong, Gerrit, The standard of ‘civilization’ in international society (Oxford, 1984)Google Scholar.

27 Park, Benjamin E., American nationalisms: imagining union in the age of revolutions, 1783–1833 (Cambridge, 2017)Google Scholar; Jürgen Osterhammel, The transformation of the world: a global history of the nineteenth century, trans. Patrick Camiller (Princeton, NJ, 2014), pp. 403–19.

28 Curthoys, Ann and Mitchell, Jessie, Taking liberty: Indigenous rights and settler self-government in colonial Australia, 1830–1890 (Cambridge, 2018), p. 55CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Attwood, Bain, Possessions: Batman’s treaty and the matter of history (Carlton, 2009)Google Scholar; Terence Ranger, ‘Missionaries, migrants and the Manyika: the invention of ethnicity in Zimbabwe’, in Leroy Vail, ed., The creation of tribalism in southern Africa (Berkeley, CA, 1989).

29 Curthoys and Mitchell, Taking liberty, p. 37.

30 Talal Asad, ‘Anthropology and the colonial encounter’, in Gerrit Huizer and Bruce Mannheim, eds., The politics of anthropology (New York, NY, 1979).

31 Bernard Cohn, ‘African models and Indian histories’, in An anthropologist among historians and other essays (Delhi, 1987), pp. 204–5.

32 Hopkins, Benjamin D., Ruling the savage periphery: frontier governance and the making of the modern state (Cambridge, MA, 2020)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Benton, Lauren, A search for sovereignty: law and geography in European empires, 1400–1900 (New York, NY, 2010)Google Scholar.

33 Ranger, Terence, ‘The invention of tradition in colonial Africa’, in Eric Hobsbawm and Terence Ranger, eds., The invention of tradition (Cambridge, 1983), p. 248Google Scholar; Southall, Aidan W., ‘The illusion of tribe’, Journal of Asian and African Studies, 5 (1970), pp. 28–50Google Scholar.

34 Ranger, ‘Invention of tradition’, p. 250; Iliffe, John, A modern history of Tanganyika (Cambridge, 1979), ch. 10CrossRefGoogle Scholar. On revisionist takes on the ‘invention of tradition’, see Spear, Thomas, ‘Neo-traditionalism and the limits of invention in British colonial Africa’, Journal of African History, 44 (2003), pp. 3–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Nugent, Paul, ‘Putting the history back into ethnicity: enslavement, religion, and cultural brokerage in the construction of Mandinka/Jola and Ewe/Agotime identities in west Africa, c. 1650–1930’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, 50 (2008), pp. 920–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

35 Nile Green, ed., Afghan history through Afghan eyes (London, 2015), p. 17; Crews, Afghan modern, ch. 1. On Afghanistan as ‘tribal’, see Nivi Manchanda, ‘The imperial sociology of the “tribe” in Afghanistan’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 46 (2018), pp. 165–89.

36 Nile Green, ‘Tribe, diaspora, and sainthood in Afghan history’, Journal of Asian Studies, 65 (2008), pp. 171–211, at pp. 185, 188.

37 Thomas Barfield, Afghanistan: a cultural and political history (Princeton, NJ, 2010), pp. 85–90.

38 Assertions of Turko-Persian imperial control, also assumed by the Durranis, prioritized direct, tighter control of major centres of power and key trade routes and far looser oversight over less economically significant or more governmentally challenging regions. Barfield has likened empires in Turko-Persia to Swiss cheese, where the holes were intentional, not defective. Barfield, Afghanistan, p. 68.

39 Barfield, Afghanistan, ch. 2; Crews, Afghan modern, ch. 2.

40 Pekka Hämäläinen, ‘What’s in a concept? The kinetic empire of the Comanches’, History and Theory, 52 (2013), pp. 81–90, at p. 85.

41 Hämäläinen, Comanche empire. On other Native American imperial formations, see Pekka Hämäläinen, Lakota America: a new history of Indigenous power (New Haven, CT, 2019); Kathleen DuVal, The Native ground: Indians and colonists in the heart of the continent (Philadelphia, PA, 2006); Willard H. Rollings, The Osage: an ethnohistorical study of hegemony on the prairie-plains (Columbia, MO, 1992).

42 Ghislaine Lydon, On trans-Saharan trails: Islamic law, trade networks, and cross-cultural exchange in nineteenth-century western Africa (Cambridge, 2009), pp. 161, 175, 181; A. Adu Boahen, ‘The caravan trade in the nineteenth century’, Journal of African History, 3 (1962), pp. 349–59. On other non-imperial Indigenous communities that relied on mobility and flexibility in their socio-economic arrangements, see Anatoly M. Khazanov, Nomads and the outside world (Madison, WI, 1994); Tracey Banivanua Mar, Decolonisation and the Pacific: Indigenous globalisation and the ends of empire (Cambridge, 2016), ch. 1.

43 Crews, Afghan modern, pp. 46, 48.

44 Hämäläinen, Comanche empire, p. 103. While ‘pueblos’ could have a variety of meanings, in this instance, the description framed Comanches as not only barbaric but also as exterminators of ostensibly non-barbarian, civilized peoples. Ophelia Marquez and Lillian Ramos Navarro Wold, eds., Compilation of colonial Spanish terms and document related phrases (2nd edn, Midway City, CA, 1998), p. 37.

45 Crews, Afghan modern, p. 58; B. D. Hopkins, The making of modern Afghanistan (Basingstoke, 2008), ch. 1.

46 Martin J. Bayly, Taming the imperial imagination: colonial knowledge, international relations, and the Anglo-Afghan encounter, 1808–1878 (Cambridge, 2016), pp. 82, 90, 190, 193; Martin J. Bayly, ‘The “re-turn” to empire in IR: colonial knowledge communities and the construction of the idea of the Afghan polity, 1809–1938’, Review of International Studies, 40 (2014), pp. 443–64. On the ways that British encounters with Pashtuns came to shape (and ‘Pashtunize’) British understandings of Afghan society and politics, and the Afghan state itself, see Hopkins, Making of modern Afghanistan.

47 Francesca Fuoli, ‘Incorporating north-western Afghanistan into the British empire: experiments in indirect rule through the making of an imperial frontier, 1884–87’, Afghanistan, 1 (2018), pp. 4–25; Bijan Omrani, ‘The Durand line: history and problems of the Afghan–Pakistan border’, Asian Affairs, 40 (2009), pp. 177–95.

48 Robert Nichols, Settling the frontier: land, law and society in the Peshawar valley, 1500–1900 (Karachi, 2001).

49 Lal Baha, N.-W.F.P. administration under British rule, 1901–1919 (Islamabad, 1978); Christian Tripodi, Edge of empire: the British political officer and tribal administration on the north-west frontier, 1877–1947 (Farnham, 2016). For a French colonial North African comparison, see Brock Cutler, ‘Believe in the border, or, how to make modernity in the nineteenth-century Maghrib’, Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient, 60 (2017), pp. 83–114.

50 Ned Blackhawk, Violence over the land: Indians and empires in the early American West (Cambridge, MA, 2006); Cole Harris, Making Native space: colonialism, resistance, and reserves in British Columbia (Vancouver, 2002).

51 Robert Fletcher, British imperialism and ‘the tribal question’ (Oxford, 2015), p. 35. The late Ottoman empire also saw this shift in tribal governance, attempting to ‘civilize’ ‘tribal’ societies through the rule of law, limiting nomadism, and cultivating local leaders to co-operate with Ottoman imperial aims. Selim Deringil, ‘“They live in a state of nomadism and savagery”: the late Ottoman empire and the post-colonial debate’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, 45 (2003), pp. 311–42; Reşat Kasaba, ‘Nomads and tribes in the Ottoman empire’, in Christine Woodhead, ed., The Ottoman world (Abingdon, 2011).

52 Hopkins, Ruling the savage periphery, p. 38; Benjamin Hopkins and Magnus Marsden, Fragments of the Afghan frontier (London, 2012), pp. 69–72; Beattie, Hugh, ‘Negotiations with the tribes of Waziristan 1849–1914: the British experience’, Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, 39 (2011), pp. 571–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

53 Colson, ‘Political organization in tribal societies’, p. 16.

54 Curthoys and Mitchell, Taking liberty, p. 37. On further examples of gift-giving, see Bennett, Alison, ‘British material diplomacy in precolonial Uganda: the gift exchanges of John Hanning Speke, 1860–1863’, Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 16 (2021), pp. 166–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

55 Ambler, Charles H., ‘The renovation of custom in colonial Kenya: the 1932 generation succession ceremonies in Embu’, Journal of African History, 30 (1989), pp. 139–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hodgson, Dorothy L., ‘Pastoralism, patriarchy and history: changing gender relations among Maasai in Tanganyika, 1890–1940’, Journal of African History, 40 (1999), pp. 41–65CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

56 Lentz, ‘Colonial construction and African initiatives’, p. 116.

57 John Lonsdale, ‘States and social processes in Africa: a historiographical survey’, African Studies Review, 24 (1981), pp. 139–225; Derek R. Peterson, Ethnic patriotism and the east African revival: a history of dissent, c. 1935–1972 (Cambridge, 2012); Steven Feierman, Peasant intellectuals anthropology and history in Tanzania (Madison, WI, 1990); Kate Crehan, ‘“Tribes” and the people who read books: managing history in colonial Zambia’, Journal of Southern African Studies, 23 (1997), pp. 203–18.

58 Hopkins, Ruling the savage periphery. Histories of indirect rule are well documented. See Michael H. Fisher, ‘Indirect rule in the British empire: the foundations of the residency system in India (1764–1858)’, Modern Asian Studies, 18 (1984), pp. 393–428; Ekeh, Peter P., ‘Social anthropology and two contrasting uses of tribalism in Africa’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, 32 (1990), pp. 660–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Vikram Visana, ‘Beyond citizen and subject: new perspectives on political thought, “tribe”, and “indirect rule” in Africa’, History Compass, 17 (2019), e12525.

59 Ghislaine Lydon, ‘On trans-Saharan trails: trade networks and cross-cultural exchange in western Africa, 1840s–1930s’ (Doctoral thesis, Michigan State University, 2000), ch. 7.

60 Benjamin D. Hopkins, ‘The Frontier Crimes Regulation and frontier governmentality’, Journal of Asian Studies, 74 (2015), pp. 369–89. Hopkins has traced the Frontier Crimes Regulation’s duplication in north-eastern India, Kenya, Basra, and Palestine, as well as the expansion of a corresponding ‘frontier governmentality’ that justified violence and extralegal measures towards ‘tribal’ populations in Natal, Nigeria, Argentina, and the United States. Hopkins, Ruling the savage periphery. On ‘lawfare’, see Comaroff, John L. and Comaroff, Jean, Law and disorder in the postcolony (Chicago, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

61 Leroy Vail and Landeg White, ‘Tribalism in the political history of Malawi’, in Vail, ed., Creation of tribalism, pp. 158–9.

62 Pierre-Yves Le Mur, ‘Locality, mobility and governmentality in colonial/postcolonial New Caledonia: the case of the Kouare tribe (xûâ Xârâgwii), Thio (Cöö)’, Oceania, 83 (2013), pp. 130–46. French colonial officials likewise used the term indigène to draw links between their encounters with North American Indigenous societies and colonial subject populations in North Africa. Brower, Benjamin Claude, A desert named peace: the violence of France’s empire in the Algerian Sahara, 1844–1902 (New York, NY, 2011), pp. 19–20Google Scholar.

63 Krakoff, Sarah, ‘Inextricably political: race, membership, and tribal sovereignty’, Washington Law Review, 87 (2012), pp. 1041–132Google Scholar, at p. 1064; Cobb, ‘Understanding tribal sovereignty’.

64 Nigam, Sanjay, ‘Disciplining and policing the “criminals by birth”, part 1: the making of a colonial stereotype: the criminal tribes and castes’, Indian Economic & Social History Review, 27 (1990), pp. 131–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at p. 135; Anastasia Piliavsky, ‘The “criminal tribe” in India before the British’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, 57 (2015), pp. 323–54; Jessica Hinchy, ‘Gender, family, and the policing of the “criminal tribes” in nineteenth-century north India’, Modern Asian Studies, 54 (2020), pp. 1669–711. While there was some blurring of ‘criminal tribes’ and ‘criminal castes’, colonial officials chose to emphasize their ‘tribal’ nature. Members of criminal tribes have subsequently used this legal category to make demands against the colonial and post-colonial state and to ensure special rights under the Indian constitution. Sarah Gandee and William Gould, ‘Introduction: margins and the state: caste, “tribe” and criminality in South Asia’, Studies in History, 36 (2020), 7–19; Sarah Gandee, ‘The “criminal tribe” and independence: partition, decolonisation, and the state in India’s Punjab, 1910s–1980s’ (Ph.D. thesis, Leeds, 2018).

65 Colson, ‘Political organization in tribal societies’, p. 14; Alesbury, Andrew, ‘A society in motion: the Tuareg from the pre-colonial era to today’, Nomadic Peoples, 17 (2013), pp. 106–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Blackhawk, Violence over the land, p. 7; Moreman, T. R., ‘The arms trade and the North-West Frontier Pathan tribes, 1890–1914’, Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, 22 (1994), pp. 187–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Imy, Kate, ‘Kidnapping and a “confirmed sodomite”: an intimate enemy on the Northwest Frontier of India, 1915–1925’, Twentieth Century British History, 28 (2017), pp. 29–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

66 Warren, Alan, ‘“Bullocks treading down wasps”? The British Indian army in Waziristan in the 1930s’, South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies, 20 (1997), pp. 35–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For a French Algerian comparison, see Brower, Desert named peace.

67 Tapper, Nancy, ‘The advent of Pashtun “maldars” in north-western Afghanistan’, Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, 36 (1973), pp. 55–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bhattacharya, Neeladri, ‘Pastoralists in a colonial world’, South Asian Chronicle, 9 (2019), pp. 17–50Google Scholar.

68 Crews, Afghan modern, p. 97.

69 Ibid., ch. 4; Green, ed., Afghan history through Afghan eyes; Hanifi, Shah Mahmoud, Connecting histories in Afghanistan: market relations and state formation on a colonial frontier (Stanford, CA, 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Ahmed, Faiz, Afghanistan rising: Islamic law and statecraft between the Ottoman and British empires (Cambridge, MA, 2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

70 Witgen, ‘American Indians in world history’, p. 604; Saunt, Claudio, A new order of things: property, power, and the transformation of the Creek Indians, 1733–1816 (New York, NY, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hahn, Steven, The invention of the Creek nation, 1670–1763 (Omaha, NB, 2004)Google Scholar; Theda Perdue, ‘The conflict within: the Cherokee power structure and removal’, Georgia Historical Quarterly, 73 (1989), pp. 467–91; McLoughlin, William G., Cherokee renascence in the new republic (Princeton, NJ, 1986)Google Scholar.

71 Both the ‘violent geography’ and the economic costs of military and political campaigns in the region mitigated against extensive colonial controls. Bayly, Taming the imperial imagination.

72 Scholarship on North America is particularly revealing on the complex relationships between gender, ‘tribe’, and empire. See Perdue, Theda, Cherokee women: gender and culture change, 1700–1835 (Omaha, NB, 1998)Google Scholar; Nancy Shoemaker, ed., Negotiators of change: historical perspectives on Native American women (New York, NY, 1995); Saunt, New order of things, ch. 6.

73 Crews, Afghan modern, pp. 82–4; Hanifi, Connecting histories. On more recent trends, see Magnus Marsden, ‘From Kabul to Kiev: Afghan trading networks across the former Soviet Union’, Modern Asian Studies, 49 (2015), pp. 1010–48; Lydon, ‘On trans-Saharan trails’, ch. 8; Sakatni, Mehdi, ‘From camel to truck? Automobiles and the pastoralist nomadism of Syrian tribes during the French mandate’, Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East, 39 (2019), pp. 159–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar. On other ‘tribal’ peoples as global actors, see Reid, Joshua L., The sea is my country: the maritime world of the Makahs (New Haven, CT, 2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Shoemaker, Nancy, Native American whalemen and the world: Indigenous encounters and the contingency of race (Chapel Hill, NC, 2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Russell, Lynette, Roving mariners: Australian Aboriginal whalers and sealers in the southern oceans, 1780–1870 (Albany, NY, 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Weaver, Jace, The red Atlantic: American indigenes and the making of the modern world, 1000–1927 (Chapel Hill, NC, 2014)Google Scholar. On the idea of ‘Indigenous Atlantics’, see Pennock, Caroline Dodds, ‘Aztecs abroad? Uncovering the early Indigenous Atlantic’, American Historical Review, 125 (2020), pp. 787–814CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

74 Hauner, Milan, India in Axis strategy: Germany, Japan, and Indian nationalists in the Second World War (London, 1981)Google Scholar; Leake, Elisabeth, The defiant border: the Afghan–Pakistan borderlands in the era of decolonization, 1936–1965 (New York, NY, 2017), ch. 1Google Scholar. On other instances of intersections between ‘tribal’ and religious mobilization, see Julia Clancy-Smith, ‘Saints, mahdis, and arms: religion and resistance in nineteenth-century North Africa’, in Edmund Burke and Ira Lapidus, eds., Islam, politics and social movements (Berkeley, CA, 1988); Wyrtzen, Jonathan, ‘Colonial state-building and the negotiation of Arab and Berber identity in protectorate Morocco’, International Journal of Middle East Studies, 43 (2011), pp. 227–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Thomas, John, Evangelising the nation: religion and the formation of Naga political identity (Delhi, 2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

75 Green, Nile, ‘The trans-border traffic of Afghan modernism: Afghanistan and the Indian “Urdusphere”’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, 53 (2011), pp. 479–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Sana Haroon, ‘Competing views of Pashtun tribalism, Islam, and society in the Indo-Afghan borderlands’, in Nile Green, ed., Afghanistan’s Islam: from conversion to the Taliban (Berkeley, CA, 2016); Amin Tarzi, ‘Islam, shari‘a, and state building under ‘Abd al-Rahman Khan’, in Green, ed., Afghanistan’s Islam.

76 Leake, Defiant border, ch. 2.

77 The earl of Listowel to Rear-Admiral Viscount Mountbatten of Burma, 5 July 1947, in N. Mansergh and P. Moon, eds., The transfer of power, XI (London, 1982), no. 539.

78 Government of India, External Affairs Department, ‘The tribes of the North-West and North-East Frontiers in a future constitution’, 1946, in ibid., VIII (London, 1977), no. 15.

79 Hoxie, Frederick E., ‘Ethnohistory for a tribal world’, Ethnohistory, 44 (1997), pp. 595–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

80 Sanders, Douglas, ‘Indigenous peoples: issues of definition’, International Journal of Cultural Property, 8 (1999), pp. 4–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

81 Lutz, Ellen and Ledema, Nicole, ‘Addressing Indigenous rights at the United Nations’, Cultural Survival, 28 (2004)Google Scholar; Crossen, Jonathan, ‘Another wave of anti-colonialism: the origins of Indigenous internationalism’, Canadian Journal of History, 52 (2017), pp. 533–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Zanthaki, Alexandra, Indigenous rights and the United Nations standards: self-determination, culture and land (Cambridge, 2010)Google Scholar.

82 Leake, Defiant border.

83 Johnson, Miranda, ‘Indigenizing self-determination at the United Nations: reparative progress in the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples’, Journal of the History of International Law, 23 (2020), pp. 206–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at p. 217.

84 Engle, Karen, ‘On fragile architecture: the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples in the context of human rights’, European Journal of International Law, 22 (2011), pp. 141–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Wiessner, Siegfried, ‘Indigenous sovereignty: a reassessment in light of the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples’, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 41 (2008), pp. 1141–76Google Scholar.

85 Leake, Defiant border; Siddique, Abubakar, The Pashtun question: the unresolved key to the future of Pakistan and Afghanistan (London, 2014)Google Scholar; Manchanda, Nivi, Imagining Afghanistan: the history and politics of imperial knowledge (Cambridge, 2020)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.